SVM, ANN, and PSF modelling approaches for prediction of iron dust minimum ignition temperature (MIT) based on the synergistic effect of dispersion pressure and concentration

Abstract Data-driven models for predicting fire and explosion-related properties have been improved greatly in recent years using machine-learning algorithms. However, choosing the best machine learning approach is still a challenging task. Therefore, in this study, the predictability comparisons have been made with the different machine learning methods used to model the MIT for iron dust. The MIT of iron dust was determined using the Godbert-Greenwald furnace for seventy unique combinations of dispersion pressures and dust concentrations. The data has been divided into 'Training Set' and 'Testing Set'. The implementation and efficacy of machine learning and statistical approaches have been demonstrated through real-time experimental results. The support vector machines (SVM) regression models were trained with various kernel functions to enhance the performance of the resultant model. The cubic kernel function was found suitable for training SVMs. Besides, a feed-forward artificial neural network with the backpropagation algorithm and a polynomial surface fit model have also been developed to predict the MIT. For statistical phenomena, such as MIT, predictive modelling based on real-time experimental data is critical. If an accurate estimate of the combustible dust's minimum ignition temperature is confirmed, it is possible to ensure that the temperatures of the surrounding hot surfaces do not rise to that level, preventing an explosion. An overall comparison of predictive models has been given with unseen test data set. All the trained models yielded comparable results with unseen test data set. However, the SVM model with Bayesian optimizer approach can effectively assess the risk of ignition based on dust MIT under the influence of dispersion pressure and dust cloud concentration among all the approaches adopted in this study.

[1]  P. Keshavarz,et al.  Modeling surface tension of pure refrigerants using feed-forward back-propagation neural networks , 2017 .

[2]  Cheng Fan,et al.  Effects of different factors on the minimum ignition temperature of the mixed dust cloud of coal and oil shale , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[3]  F. Heymes,et al.  Forecasting powder dispersion in a complex environment using Artificial Neural Networks , 2017 .

[4]  Hamid R. Safavi,et al.  Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater: Application of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Genetic Algorithms , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[5]  Stephane Bernard,et al.  Statistical method for the determination of the ignition energy of dust cloud-experimental validation , 2010 .

[6]  Angela S. Blair,et al.  Dust explosion incidents and regulations in the United States , 2007 .

[7]  Juan A. Lazzús,et al.  Autoignition Temperature Prediction Using an Artificial Neural Network with Particle Swarm Optimization , 2011 .

[8]  Ludivine Pidol,et al.  Flash Point and Cetane Number Predictions for Fuel Compounds Using Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) Methods , 2011 .

[9]  F. Gharagheizi A new group contribution-based model for estimation of lower flammability limit of pure compounds. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  T. M. Bafitlhile,et al.  Applicability of ε-Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network for Flood Forecasting in Humid, Semi-Humid and Semi-Arid Basins in China , 2019, Water.

[11]  Ming Yang,et al.  Dynamic failure analysis of process systems using neural networks , 2017 .

[12]  F. Gharagheizi,et al.  Computation of Upper Flash Point of Chemical Compounds Using a Chemical Structure-Based Model , 2012 .

[13]  Enrico Danzi,et al.  Explosibility of metallic waste dusts , 2017 .

[14]  L. Pang,et al.  Risk assessment method of polyethylene dust explosion based on explosion parameters , 2021 .

[15]  H. Acquah Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship , 2010 .

[16]  Noor Quddus,et al.  Developing Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Models To Predict the Upper Flammability Limit Using Machine Learning , 2019, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[17]  Amal I. Saba,et al.  Forecasting the prevalence of COVID-19 outbreak in Egypt using nonlinear autoregressive artificial neural networks , 2020, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[18]  M. Keshavarz,et al.  The simplest method for reliable prediction of autoignition temperature of organic hydroxyl compounds to assess their process safety in industrial applications , 2021 .

[19]  Qingsheng Wang,et al.  Prediction of Minimum Ignition Energy from Molecular Structure Using Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) Models , 2017 .

[20]  Yong Pan,et al.  Prediction of the Auto-Ignition Temperatures of Binary Miscible Liquid Mixtures from Molecular Structures , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[21]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Application of inherent safety principles to dust explosion prevention and mitigation , 2009 .

[22]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Review and analysis of supervised machine learning algorithms for hazardous events in drilling operations , 2021 .

[23]  Abbas Rohani,et al.  Assessment of energy consumption and modeling of output energy for wheat production by neural network (MLP and RBF) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) models , 2018 .

[24]  Qiu-hong Wang,et al.  Ignition and explosion characteristics of micron-scale aluminum–silicon alloy powder , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[25]  Salem Alkhalaf,et al.  Nature-inspired algorithms for feed-forward neural network classifiers: A survey of one decade of research , 2020 .

[26]  M. Shiflett,et al.  Metal Dust Explosion Hazards: A Technical Review , 2018, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[27]  Mohammad Amin Sobati,et al.  New structure-based models for the prediction of flash point of multi-component organic mixtures , 2019, Thermochimica Acta.

[28]  Mehdi Bagheri,et al.  BPSO-MLR and ANFIS based modeling of lower flammability limit , 2012 .

[29]  A novel model for predicting lower flammability limits using Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship approach , 2017 .

[30]  R. Eckhoff Origin and development of the Godbert-Greenwald furnace for measuring minimum ignition temperatures of dust clouds , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[31]  Jiangshi Zhang,et al.  Factors influencing and a statistical method for describing dust explosion parameters: A review , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[32]  Nilesh Ade,et al.  Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) prediction models for ignition sensitive fuels using machine learning methods , 2021, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[33]  Harold U. Escobar-Hernandez,et al.  Review of recent developments of quantitative structure-property relationship models on fire and explosion-related properties , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[34]  R. Ghasemiasl,et al.  A Neural Network QSPR Model for Accurate Prediction of Flash Point of Pure Hydrocarbons , 2018, Molecular informatics.

[35]  J. Degrève,et al.  A model for the minimum ignition energy of dust clouds , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[36]  Amin Alibakshi,et al.  Strategies to develop robust neural network models: Prediction of flash point as a case study. , 2018, Analytica chimica acta.

[37]  A. Bokhari,et al.  Optimization on cleaner intensification of ozone production using Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology: Parametric and comparative study , 2020 .

[38]  H. Gavin The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems , 2019 .

[39]  S. A. Taqvi,et al.  Modelling of the minimum ignition temperature (MIT) of corn dust using statistical analysis and artificial neural networks based on the synergistic effect of concentration and dispersion pressure , 2021 .

[40]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[41]  Gwo-Fong Lin,et al.  An Hourly Streamflow Forecasting Model Coupled with an Enforced Learning Strategy , 2015 .

[42]  Juan A. Lazzús,et al.  Prediction of flammability limit temperatures from molecular structures using a neural network–particle swarm algorithm , 2011 .

[43]  Zhenyi Liu,et al.  Research Progress on Flash Point Prediction , 2010 .

[44]  D. P. Mishra,et al.  Experimental investigation on effects of particle size, dust concentration and dust-dispersion-air pressure on minimum ignition temperature and combustion process of coal dust clouds in a G-G furnace , 2018, Fuel.

[45]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future , 2015 .

[46]  Farhad Gharagheizi,et al.  An accurate model for prediction of autoignition temperature of pure compounds. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[47]  M. Bagheri,et al.  QSPR estimation of the auto-ignition temperature for pure hydrocarbons , 2016 .

[48]  M. Mittal Explosion characteristics of micron- and nano-size magnesium powders , 2014 .

[49]  Qiu-hong Wang,et al.  Minimum ignition temperatures and explosion characteristics of micron-sized aluminium powder , 2020 .

[50]  Chad V. Mashuga,et al.  Effect of particle morphology on dust minimum ignition energy , 2019, Powder Technology.

[51]  Faxin Wang,et al.  Comparative Analysis of ANN and SVM Models Combined with Wavelet Preprocess for Groundwater Depth Prediction , 2017 .

[52]  J. Pandelaki,et al.  Cerebral infarction classification using multiple support vector machine with information gain feature selection , 2020 .