Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion

The magnitude by which a defibrillation shock extends the refractory period immediately postshock (refractory period extension, RPE) does not explain why biphasic shocks defibrillate with greater efficacy than monophasic shocks. It may be that spatial heterogeneity of RPE is a more important regulator of defibrillation efficacy. We measured RPE in 15 pentobarbital-anesthetized swine using 400-V biphasic and monophasic shocks of equal pulse duration at three discrete myocardial sites. Spatial heterogeneity of RPE was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the three recording sites. Monophasic shocks produced greater magnitude of RPE than biphasic shocks at all sites tested (82 +/- 6 to 99 +/- 13 and 64 +/- 6 to 68 +/- 5 ms, respectively; P < 0.05). However, RPE dispersion was significantly less with biphasic shocks versus monophasic shocks (29 +/- 4 and 48 +/- 7 ms, respectively; P < 0.05). This suggests that one potential mechanism by which biphasic shocks defibrillate with greater efficacy is limiting postshock spatial heterogeneity of refractoriness. Thus these data support our hypothesis that RPE heterogeneity is a more likely predictor of defibrillation efficacy than magnitude of RPE.

[1]  J.L. Jones,et al.  Refractory period prolongation by biphasic defibrillator waveforms is associated with enhanced sodium current in a computer model of the ventricular action potential , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J E Brewer,et al.  Charge-burping theory correctly predicts optimal ratios of phase duration for biphasic defibrillation waveforms. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  J. Spear,et al.  Patterns of Ventricular Activity During Catheter Defibrillation , 1974, Circulation.

[4]  M W Kroll,et al.  A Minimal Model of the Single Capacitor Biphasic Defibrillation Waveform , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  P. Wolf,et al.  Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. , 1989, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  N Engl,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  P. Chen,et al.  Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation. A different point of view. , 1991, Circulation.

[8]  P D Wolf,et al.  Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. , 1986, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  P. D. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defibrillation. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  P. Wolf,et al.  Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs. , 1993, Circulation research.

[11]  J. Jones,et al.  Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts. , 1991, Circulation research.

[12]  M R Franz,et al.  Electrocardiographic indexes of dispersion of ventricular repolarization: an isolated heart validation study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S M Dillon,et al.  Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period. , 1991, Circulation research.

[14]  P. Kowey,et al.  Effect of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression on ventricular electrophysiology and vulnerability to inducible arrhythmia in the feline heart. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  O. Tovar,et al.  Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation. , 1997, American Journal of Physiology.

[16]  W. M. Smith,et al.  Effect of field stimulation on cellular repolarization in rabbit myocardium. Implications for reentry induction. , 1992, Circulation research.

[17]  R Plonsey,et al.  Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. , 1990, Circulation.

[18]  P. Kowey,et al.  Electrophysiological Effects of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Effect of Calcium and Potassium Channel Blockade , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  P D Wolf,et al.  The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. , 1986, Circulation.

[20]  P D Wolf,et al.  Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs. , 1993, Circulation research.

[21]  P D Wolf,et al.  Response of Relatively Refractory Canine Myocardium to Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks , 1991, Circulation.

[22]  S. Dillon.  Synchronized Repolarization After Defibrillation Shocks: A Possible Component of the Defibrillation Process Demonstrated by Optical Recordings in Rabbit Heart , 1992, Circulation.

[23]  M. Schlepper,et al.  Effect of Biphasic Waveform Pulse on Endocardial Defibrillation Efficacy in Humans , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[24]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Characterization of Refractory Period Extension by Transcardiac Shock , 1991, Circulation.

[25]  O. Tovar,et al.  The mechanism of defibrillation and cardioversion , 1996 .

[26]  M. Ujhelyi,et al.  Lidocaine Does Not Affect Myocardial Electrical Heterogeneity: Implications for Low Proarrhythmic Actions , 1997, Pharmacotherapy.

[27]  P D Wolf,et al.  Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs. , 1991, Circulation research.

[28]  L Tung,et al.  Modeling the Interaction Between Propagating Cardiac Waves and Monophasic and Biphasic Field Stimuli: , 1996, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[29]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  D P Zipes,et al.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  M. Gabel,et al.  Differential effects of lidocaine on defibrillation threshold with monophasic versus biphasic shock waveforms. , 1996, Circulation.

[32]  S M Dillon,et al.  Shock-induced depolarization of refractory myocardium prevents wave-front propagation in defibrillation. , 1996, Circulation research.

[33]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Refractory Period Extension During Ventricular Pacing at Fibrillatory Pacing Rates , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[34]  P D Wolf,et al.  Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[35]  P D Wolf,et al.  Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs. , 1990, Circulation research.

[36]  O. Tovar,et al.  Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities. , 1995, Circulation research.

[37]  P D Wolf,et al.  Cardiac Potential and Potential Gradient Fields Generated by Single, Combined, and Sequential Shocks During Ventricular Defibrillation , 1992, Circulation.

[38]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation. , 1996, Circulation.

[39]  P R Reid,et al.  Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks. , 1990, Circulation.

[40]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of Biphasic Waveforms for Human Nonthoracotomy Defibrillation , 1993, Circulation.

[41]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy. , 1996, Circulation.

[42]  R. Damle,et al.  Effect of increased drive-train stimulus intensity on dispersion of ventricular refractoriness. , 1995, Circulation.