Perceived texture segregation in chromatic element-arrangement patterns: High intensity interference

An element-arrangement pattern is composed of two types of elements that differ in the ways in which they are arranged in different regions of the pattern. We report experiments on the perceived segregation of chromatic element-arrangement patterns composed of equal-size red and blue squares as the luminances of the surround, the interspaces and the background (surround plus interspaces) are varied. Perceived segregation was markedly reduced by increasing the luminance of the interspaces. Perceived segregation was approximately constant for constant ratios of interspace luminance to square luminance and increased with the contrast ratio of the squares. Unlike achromatic element-arrangement patterns composed of squares differing in lightness [Beck et al (1991). Vision Research, 32, 719-743] perceived segregation did not decrease when the luminance of the interspaces was below that of the squares. Similar results were obtained for red and yellow, red and green, green and yellow, green and blue, and blue and yellow squares. Perceived segregation based on edge alignment was not interfered with by high intensity interspaces. Stereoscopic cues that caused the squares composing the element-arrangement pattern to be seen in front of the interspaces did not greatly improve perceived segregation. One explanation of the results is in terms of inhibitory interactions among achromatic and chromatic cortical cells tuned to spatial frequency and orientation. Alternately, the results may be explained in terms of how the luminance of the interspaces affects the grouping of the squares for encoding surface representations. Neither explanation accounts fully for the data and both mechanisms may be involved.

[1]  N Graham,et al.  Lightness differences and the perceived segregation of regions and populations , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  S. Grossberg Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: I. Monocular theory , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Ben Kröse,et al.  Features and spatial filters , 1988, Nature.

[4]  K Prazdny,et al.  Illusory contours are not caused by simultaneous brightness contrast , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural networks for vision and image processing , 1992 .

[6]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  C. R. Michael Color-sensitive complex cells in monkey striate cortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Human and Machine Vision , 1983 .

[11]  Jamie Goode,et al.  Ciba Foundation Symposium 184 - Higher-Order Processing in the Visual System , 1994 .

[12]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[14]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .

[15]  J. Bergen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Visual Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[16]  J Gordon,et al.  Nonlinearity in the perception of form , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S Grossberg,et al.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Norma Graham,et al.  Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Beck Interference in the perceived segregation of equal-luminance element-arrangement texture patterns , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  R M Boynton,et al.  Vision: The Additivity Law Made To Work for Heterochromatic Photometry with Bipartite Fields , 1968, Science.

[22]  C. R. Michael,et al.  Columnar organization of color cells in monkey's striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Ts'o,et al.  The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[26]  C. R. Michael Color vision mechanisms in monkey striate cortex: simple cells with dual opponent-color receptive fields. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J. Beck,et al.  Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J. Beck,et al.  Line segregation. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[29]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational models of visual processing , 1991 .

[30]  S Grossberg,et al.  3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex , 2010, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  A Theory of Textural Segmentation , 1983 .

[32]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  H C Nothdurft,et al.  Texton segregation by associated differences in global and local luminance distribution , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[34]  R. Schülke [Anatomy and physiology]. , 1968, Zahntechnik; Zeitschrift fur Theorie und Praxis der wissenschaftlichen Zahntechnik.

[35]  J. Beck Visual Processing in Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[36]  P. Gouras,et al.  Responses of cells in foveal visual cortex of the monkey to pure color contrast. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  C. R. Michael Color-sensitive hypercomplex cells in monkey striate cortex. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering , 1994, Vision Research.

[40]  C. R. Michael Laminar segregation of color cells in the monkey's striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[41]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.