Deficits in phonology and past tense morphology

Neuropsychological dissociations between regular and irregular past tense verb processing have been explained in two ways: (a) separate mechanisms of a rule-governed process for regular verbs and a lexical-associative process for irregular verbs; (b) a single system drawing on phonological and semantic knowledge. The latter account invokes phonological impairment as the basis of poorer performance for regular than irregular past tense forms, due to greater phonological complexity of the regular past. In 10 nonfluent aphasic patients, the apparent disadvantage for the production of regular past tense forms disappeared when phonological complexity was controlled. In a same-different judgment task on spoken words, all patients were impaired at judging regular stem and past-tense verbs like man/manned to be different, but equally poor at phonologically matched non-morphological discriminations like men/mend. These results indicate a central phonological deficit that is not limited to speech output nor to morphological processing; under such a deficit, distinctions lacking phonological salience, as typified by regular past tense English verbs, become especially vulnerable.

[1]  D. Swinney,et al.  Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[2]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  The Processing of Regular and Irregular Verbs , 2005 .

[3]  R. Pastore.  The Psychophysics of Speech Perception , 2005 .

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Michael Wilson.  MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[6]  Laura Lakusta,et al.  Past tense formation in Williams syndrome , 2001 .

[7]  D. Howard,et al.  Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  M T Ullman,et al.  The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[9]  J. Hodges,et al.  Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Michael T. Ullman,et al.  Inflectional morphology in a family with inherited specific language impairment , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  M. Ullman.  Acceptability Ratings of Regular and Irregular Past-tense Forms: Evidence for a Dual-system Model of Language from Word Frequency and Phonological Neighbourhood Effects , 1999 .

[15]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome , 1998, Cognition.

[16]  H. Brownell,et al.  Speed of Lexical Activation in Nonfluent Broca's Aphasia and Fluent Wernicke's Aphasia , 1997, Brain and Language.

[17]  M. Penke,et al.  How the brain processes complex words: an event-related potential study of German verb inflections. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[19]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  P. Hagoort.  Semantic Priming in Broca's Aphasics at a Short SOA: No Support for an Automatic Access Deficit , 1997, Brain and Language.

[21]  Virginia A. Marchman,et al.  Children's Productivity in the English Past Tense: The Role of Frequency, Phonology, and Neighborhood Structure , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Induction of First-Order Decision Lists: Results on Learning the Past Tense of English Verbs , 1995, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[25]  D. Plaut.  Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  L. K. Tyler,et al.  Automatic Access of Lexical Information in Broca′s Aphasics: Against the Automaticity Hypothesis , 1995, Brain and Language.

[27]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[28]  K. Patterson.  Phonological ALEXIA or PHONOLOGICAL alexia , 1995 .

[29]  Edgar Zurif,et al.  Slowed lexical access in nonfluent aphasia: A case study , 1992, Brain and Language.

[30]  M. Gopnik,et al.  Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder , 1991, Cognition.

[31]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[32]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated , 1990 .

[33]  Morris Halle,et al.  The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[34]  A. Benton.  The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders , 1973, Neurology.