Effect of Wearable Digital Intervention for Improving Socialization in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Autism behavioral therapy is effective but expensive and difficult to access. While mobile technology–based therapy can alleviate wait-lists and scale for increasing demand, few clinical trials exist to support its use for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) care. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Superpower Glass, an artificial intelligence–driven wearable behavioral intervention for improving social outcomes of children with ASD. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized clinical trial in which participants received the Superpower Glass intervention plus standard of care applied behavioral analysis therapy and control participants received only applied behavioral analysis therapy. Assessments were completed at the Stanford University Medical School, and enrolled participants used the Superpower Glass intervention in their homes. Children aged 6 to 12 years with a formal ASD diagnosis who were currently receiving applied behavioral analysis therapy were included. Families were recruited between June 2016 and December 2017. The first participant was enrolled on November 1, 2016, and the last appointment was completed on April 11, 2018. Data analysis was conducted between April and October 2018. Interventions The Superpower Glass intervention, deployed via Google Glass (worn by the child) and a smartphone app, promotes facial engagement and emotion recognition by detecting facial expressions and providing reinforcing social cues. Families were asked to conduct 20-minute sessions at home 4 times per week for 6 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Four socialization measures were assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis with a Bonferroni test correction. Results Overall, 71 children (63 boys [89%]; mean [SD] age, 8.38 [2.46] years) diagnosed with ASD were enrolled (40 [56.3%] were randomized to treatment, and 31 (43.7%) were randomized to control). Children receiving the intervention showed significant improvements on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviors Scale socialization subscale compared with treatment as usual controls (mean [SD] treatment impact, 4.58 [1.62]; P = .005). Positive mean treatment effects were also found for the other 3 primary measures but not to a significance threshold of P = .0125. Conclusions and Relevance The observed 4.58-point average gain on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviors Scale socialization subscale is comparable with gains observed with standard of care therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial to demonstrate efficacy of a wearable digital intervention to improve social behavior of children with ASD. The intervention reinforces facial engagement and emotion recognition, suggesting either or both could be a mechanism of action driving the observed improvement. This study underscores the potential of digital home therapy to augment the standard of care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569176

[1]  Georgina Peacock,et al.  Whittling Down the Wait Time: Exploring Models to Minimize the Delay from Initial Concern to Diagnosis and Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder. , 2016, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[2]  C. McDougle,et al.  Effects of risperidone and parent training on adaptive functioning in children with pervasive developmental disorders and serious behavioral problems. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[3]  S. Bölte,et al.  The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) as a screener for autism spectrum disorders: additional evidence and cross-cultural validity. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[4]  M. Knapp,et al.  Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. , 2014, JAMA pediatrics.

[5]  Connie Kasari,et al.  Measuring social communication behaviors as a treatment endpoint in individuals with autism spectrum disorder , 2015, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[6]  D. Almirall,et al.  Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[7]  C. Lord,et al.  Brief Observation of Social Communication Change , 2016 .

[8]  Peter Washington,et al.  SuperpowerGlass , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[9]  Peter Washington,et al.  Feasibility Testing of a Wearable Behavioral Aid for Social Learning in Children with Autism , 2018, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[10]  Angel Fettig,et al.  Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review , 2015, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[11]  G. Dawson Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[12]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  Teaching Individuals With Developmental Delays: Basic Intervention Techniques , 2002 .

[13]  D. Skuse,et al.  Avoidance of emotionally arousing stimuli predicts social–perceptual impairment in Asperger's syndrome , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Ofer Golan,et al.  Basic and complex emotion recognition in children with autism: cross-cultural findings , 2016, Molecular Autism.

[15]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  The Extended Cohn-Kanade Dataset (CK+): A complete dataset for action unit and emotion-specified expression , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops.

[16]  O. Grynszpan,et al.  Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis , 2014, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[17]  Amy L. Donaldson,et al.  Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention for Toddlers With Autism: The Early Start Denver Model , 2010, Pediatrics.

[18]  Z. Warren,et al.  Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. , 2014, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[19]  Peter Washington,et al.  Exploratory study examining the at-home feasibility of a wearable tool for social-affective learning in children with autism , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[20]  Aubyn C. Stahmer,et al.  Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions: Empirically Validated Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2015, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[21]  Connie Kasari,et al.  Assessing Change in Early Intervention Programs for Children with Autism , 2002, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[22]  L. Lecavalier,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and the Social Communication Questionnaire in preschoolers suspected of having pervasive developmental disorders , 2008, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[23]  Alex Martin,et al.  Facial Emotion Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Studies , 2010, Neuropsychology Review.

[24]  T. Achenbach,et al.  The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. , 2000, Pediatrics in review.

[25]  C. Freitag,et al.  Using the brief observation of social communication change (BOSCC) to measure autism‐specific development , 2016, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[26]  E. Strauss,et al.  NEPSY-II: A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, Second Edition , 2009 .

[27]  Gale H. Roid,et al.  Essentials of Stanford-Binet intelligence scales (SB5) assessment , 2004 .