Using Repertory Grids to Conduct Cross-Cultural Information Systems Research

As more business is being conducted internationally and corporations establishthemselves globally, the impact of cross-cultural aspects becomes an important research issue. The need to conduct cross-cultural research is perhaps even more important in the relatively newly emerging and quickly changing information systems (IS)field. This article presents issues relating to qualitative research, emic versus etic approaches, and describes a structured, yet flexible, qualitative research interviewing technique, which decreases the potential for bias on the part of the researcher. The grounded theory technique presented in this article is based on Kelly's Repertory Grid (RepGrid), which concentrates on "laddering," or the further elaboration of elicited constructs, to obtain detailed researchparticipant comments about an aspect within the domain of discourse. The technique provides structure to a "one-to-one "interview. But, at the same time, RepGrids allow sufficient flexibility for the research participants to be able to express their own interpretation about a particular topic. This article includes a brief outline of a series of research projects that employed the RepGrid technique to examine similarities and differences in the way in which "excellent" systems analysts are viewed in two different cultures. Also included is a discussion of the technique's applicability for qualitative researchin general and cross-cultural studies specifically. The article concludes by suggesting ways in which the RepGrid technique addresses some of the major methodological issues in cross-cultural research.

[1]  G. Walsham,et al.  Managing IT for Business Innovation: Issues of Culture, Learning, and Leadership in a Jamaican Insurance Company , 1995 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  THE POVERTY OF SCIENTISM IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[3]  M. Gordon Hunter,et al.  A strategy for identifying 'excellent' systems analysts , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  R. Hirschheim INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[5]  M. Gordon Hunter,et al.  A cross‐cultural comparison of ‘excellent’ systems analysts , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies , 1987, CACM.

[7]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[8]  Margaret Tan,et al.  Turnover and remuneration of information technology professionals in Singapore , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Mildred L. G. Shaw,et al.  On Becoming a Personal Scientist: Interactive Computer Elicitation of Personal Models of the World , 1980 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  H. Triandis The analysis of subjective culture , 1973 .

[12]  HunterM. Gordon Excellent systems analysts , 1994 .

[13]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[14]  Francis Harvey,et al.  National cultural differences in theory and practice: Evaluating Hofstede's national cultural framework , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Colin Eden,et al.  Using Repertory Grids for Problem Construction , 1984 .

[16]  P. Ein-Dor,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on IS: Implications for International Information Systems , 1993 .

[17]  Kuo-shu Yang,et al.  Will societal modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? , 1988 .

[18]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[19]  Soon Ang,et al.  Information systems employment structures in the USA and Singapore: a cross-cultural comparison , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  L. A. Pervin Personality: Theory and Research , 1984 .

[21]  D. Straub,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of Arab Culture and Information Technology Transfer , 1998 .

[22]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Knowledge bases: Integration, verification, and partitioning , 1989 .

[23]  Keith Swigger,et al.  Validation of the Repertory Grid for Use in Modeling Knowledge , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  A. Stewart,et al.  Business applications of repertory grid , 1981 .

[25]  C. Peter Herman,et al.  Personality: Theory and Research (5th ed.). , 1990 .

[26]  G. Hofstede The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories , 1983 .

[27]  Frank Land,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies , 2002 .

[28]  Katherine H. P. Bridges Convergence and divergence , 1987 .

[29]  Gary John Phythian,et al.  Developing an expert support system for tender enquiry evaluation: A case study , 1992 .

[30]  Kenneth L. Pike,et al.  Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd rev. ed. , 1967 .

[31]  F. Tan,et al.  A research manifesto for global information management , 1999 .

[32]  Keith Swigger,et al.  Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge , 1992 .

[33]  William Washabaugh,et al.  Emics and Etics: The Insider-Outsider Debate . Edited by Thomas Headlund, Kenneth Pike, and Marvin Harris. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Press, 1990. 226 pp. , 1991, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[34]  D. Bannister,et al.  The evaluation of personal constructs , 1968 .

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[36]  Diane Lending,et al.  Update on MIS research: a profile of leading journals and U.S. universities , 1992, DATB.

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Simcha Ronen,et al.  Comparative and multinational management , 1986 .

[39]  Louis C. K. Ma,et al.  Critical issues of IS management in Hong Kong: a cultural comparison , 1993 .

[40]  R. Corsini,et al.  Personality Theories: Research and Assessment , 1983 .