Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ana Tomicic | Anamaria Malesevic | Anto Cartolovni | Anto Čartolovni | A. Tomičić | Anamaria Malesevic
[1] Bjørn Hofmann,et al. Ethical Challenges with Welfare Technology: A Review of the Literature , 2012, Science and Engineering Ethics.
[2] Paul Glasziou,et al. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[3] Atsushi Araki,et al. Reviewing the definition of “elderly” , 2006 .
[4] Nicole C. Krämer,et al. Similarities and differences between genders in the usage of computer with different levels of technological complexity , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[5] Natasha D. Schüll. Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care , 2016, BioSocieties.
[6] C. Pagliari,et al. Digital Participatory Surveillance and the Zika Crisis: Opportunities and Caveats , 2016, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.
[7] Jiwon Oh,et al. Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews , 2013, Clinical epidemiology.
[8] Ronald Glasberg,et al. Outside the Lines: Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. , 1997 .
[9] Anders Albrechtslund,et al. Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance , 2008, First Monday.
[10] Deborah Lupton,et al. Self-tracking, health and medicine , 2017 .
[11] J. McGowan,et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[12] Rüdiger Pryss,et al. Mobile Crowdsensing in Healthcare Scenarios: Taxonomy, Conceptual Pillars, Smart Mobile Crowdsensing Services , 2019, Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics.
[13] M. Hotopf,et al. Digital phenotyping, behavioral sensing, or personal sensing: names and transparency in the digital age , 2020, npj Digital Medicine.
[14] Kostas Dimopoulos,et al. Constructing social representations of science and technology: the role of metaphors in the press and the popular scientific magazines , 2004 .
[15] Btihaj Ajana. Communal self-tracking: Data philanthropy, solidarity and privacy , 2018 .
[16] Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al. Passive data collection and use in healthcare: A systematic review of ethical issues , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[17] James Tung,et al. User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.
[18] Tamar Sharon. Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare , 2017 .
[19] Isaac Cooper,et al. Ethical Issues in Biometrics , 2019, Science Insights.
[20] B. Turner,et al. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory , 1997 .
[21] John Torous,et al. New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research , 2016, JMIR mental health.
[22] S. Rauch,et al. Harnessing Smartphone-Based Digital Phenotyping to Enhance Behavioral and Mental Health , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.
[23] Guido Möllering,et al. The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension , 2001 .
[24] Deborah Lupton. The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance , 2016 .
[25] Muntazir Mehdi,et al. Smart mobile crowdsensing for tinnitus research: student research abstract , 2019, SAC.
[26] J. Law. Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .
[27] Hossam M. Hammady,et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews , 2016, Systematic Reviews.
[28] M. Kruk,et al. Assessing health system performance in developing countries: a review of the literature. , 2008, Health policy.