The spatial representation of power in children

Previous evidence demonstrates that power is mentally represented as vertical space by adults. However, little is known about how power is mentally represented in children. The current research examines such representations. The influence of vertical information (motor cues) was tested in both an explicit power evaluation task (judge whether labels refer to powerless or powerful groups) and an incidental task (judge whether labels refer to people or animals). The results showed that when power was explicitly evaluated, vertical motor responses interfered with responding in children and adults, i.e., they responded to words representing powerful groups faster with the up than the down cursor key (and vice versa for powerless groups). However, this interference effect disappeared in the incidental task in children. The findings suggest that children have developed a spatial representation of power before they have been taught power–space associations formally, but that they do not judge power spontaneously.

[1]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  The Power in Your Hand: Gender Differences in Bodily Feedback From Making a Fist , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Barry Schwartz,et al.  Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. , 1982 .

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Cognitive and Neural Contributions to Understanding the Conceptual System , 2022 .

[7]  G. Lakoff.  Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[8]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[9]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Control over the AssoCiAtion of Power And size , 2009 .

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  Big and Mighty: Preverbal Infants Mentally Represent Social Dominance , 2011, Science.

[11]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Mia Setic,et al.  The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification , 2007 .

[13]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[14]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[15]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Neural Substrates of Social Status Inference: Roles of Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Thomas W. Schubert.  Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Conceptual metaphorical mapping in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2013, eLife.

[19]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Why the Sunny Side Is Up , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[22]  L. Squire.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[23]  F. Strack,et al.  Approach and avoidance: the influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  High in the Hierarchy: How Vertical Location and Judgments of Leaders' Power are Interrelated , 2007 .

[26]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life , 2013 .

[29]  David Kirsh,et al.  When is Information Explicitly Represented , 1990 .

[30]  Eliot R. Smith.  Model of social inference processes , 1984 .

[31]  F. Pulvermüller.  Brain reflections of words and their meaning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Gibbs.  The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[33]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures , 1996, Nature.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[35]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Lei Zhu,et al.  The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  Old cortex, new contexts: re-purposing spatial perception for social cognition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  Z. Dienes,et al.  A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  Inge Boot.  Representation of Categories Metaphorical Use of the Container Schema , 2011 .

[43]  André Berchtold,et al.  How Preschoolers Use Cues of Dominance to Make Sense of Their Social Environment , 2015 .

[44]  Lotte Ansgaard Thomsen,et al.  Core Cognition of Social Relations , 2013 .

[45]  Brian P. Meier,et al.  Downright Sexy: Verticality, Implicit Power, and Perceived Physical Attractiveness , 2009 .

[46]  Kristin Shutts,et al.  Children use nonverbal cues to make inferences about social power. , 2015, Child development.

[47]  Hans Ijzerman,et al.  The Thermometer of Social Relations , 2009, Psychological science.

[48]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[49]  Liu Jian.  Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor Domains of Spatial Dimensionality Words "high/low" in Children's Literary Language , 2007 .

[50]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Embodiment of Social Status: Verticality Effects in Multilevel Rank-Orders , 2013 .

[51]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. , 2014 .

[52]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[53]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Is power–space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.