Monitoring Daily QA 3 constancy for routine quality assurance on linear accelerators.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Daily QA 3 (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, USA) device as a safe quality assurance device for control of machine specific parameters, such as linear accelerator output, beam quality and beam flatness and symmetry. Measurements were performed using three Varian 2300iX linear accelerators. The suitability of Daily QA 3 as a device for quality control of linear accelerator parameters was investigated for both 6 and 10MV photons and 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18MeV electrons. Measurements of machine specific using the Daily QA 3 device were compared to corresponding measurements using a simpler constancy meter, Farmer chamber and plane parallel ionisation chamber in a water tank. The Daily QA 3 device showed a linear dose response making it a suitable device for detection of output variations during routine measurements. It was noted that over estimations of variations compared with Farmer chamber readings were seen if the Daily QA 3 wasn't calibrated for output and sensitivity on a regular eight to ten monthly basis. Temperature-pressure correction factors calculated by Daily QA 3 also contributed towards larger short term variations seen in output measurements. Energy, symmetry and flatness variations detected by Daily QA 3 were consistent with measurements performed in water tank using a parallel plate chamber. It was concluded that the Daily QA 3 device is suitable for routine daily and fortnightly quality assurance of linear accelerator beam parameters however a regular eight-ten monthly dose and detector array calibration will improve error detection capabilities of the device.

[1]  Hannu Järvinen,et al.  The influence of output measurement time interval and tolerance on treatment dose deviation in photon external beam radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  Michael Baumann,et al.  TCP and NTCP: a basic introduction. , 2005, Rays.

[4]  A Wambersie,et al.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy? , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  M W D Grattan,et al.  Analysis of output trends from Varian 2100C/D and 600C/D accelerators , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Garry M McDermott,et al.  Monitoring linear accelerator output constancy using the PTW Linacheck. , 2011, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  Maria Sjölin,et al.  Incorrect dosimetric leaf separation in IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: Clinical impact and correlation with pretreatment quality assurance. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  Rebecca Murry.  A review of the QA history for five Varian linear accelerators , 2014 .

[10]  A. Dutreix.  When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy? , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Retrospective analysis of linear accelerator output constancy checks using process control techniques , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  B. Gino Fallone,et al.  A TCP‐NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  Mika Kapanen,et al.  Analysis of quality control data of eight modern radiotherapy linear accelerators: the short- and long-term behaviours of the outputs and the reproducibility of quality control measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Björn Poppe,et al.  High resolution ion chamber array delivery quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: Commissioning and validation. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.