Can Data Generated by Connected Vehicles Enhance Safety?: Proactive Approach to Intersection Safety Management

Traditionally, evaluation of intersection safety has been largely reactive and based on historical crash frequency data. However, the emerging data from connected and autonomous vehicles can complement historical data and help in proactively identifying intersections with high levels of variability in instantaneous driving behaviors before the occurrence of crashes. On the basis of data from the Safety Pilot Model Deployment in Ann Arbor, Michigan, this study developed a unique database that integrated intersection crash and inventory data with more than 65 million real-world basic safety messages logged by 3,000 connected vehicles; this database provided a more complete picture of operations and safety performance at intersections. As a proactive safety measure and a leading indicator of safety, location-based volatility was introduced; this quantified variability in instantaneous driving decisions at intersections. Location-based volatility represented the driving performance of connected-vehicle drivers traveling through a specific intersection. As such, with the use of the coefficient of variation as a standardized measure of relative dispersion, location-based volatility was calculated for 116 intersections in Ann Arbor. Rigorous fixed- and random-parameter Poisson regression models were estimated to quantify relationships between intersection-specific volatilities and crash frequencies. Although exposure-related factors were controlled for, the results provided evidence of a statistically significant (at the 5% level) positive association between intersection-specific volatility and crash frequencies for signalized intersections. The implications of these findings for proactive intersection safety management are discussed.

[1]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Disaggregate Safety Performance Models for Signalized Intersections on Ontario Provincial Roads , 1998 .

[2]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large-Scale Traffic Incidents , 2017 .

[3]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling Traffic Incident Duration Using Quantile Regression , 2016 .

[4]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  What Is the Level of Volatility in Instantaneous Driving Decisions , 2015 .

[5]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Delivering improved alerts, warnings, and control assistance using basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles ☆ , 2016 .

[6]  Osama A. Osman,et al.  A network level connectivity robustness measure for connected vehicle environments , 2015 .

[7]  Simon Washington,et al.  A simultaneous equations model of crash frequency by collision type for rural intersections , 2009 .

[8]  Lars Åberg,et al.  Speed choice in relation to speed limit and influences from other drivers , 2000 .

[9]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[10]  Saeed Rahimpour Golroudbary,et al.  Traffic simulation of two adjacent unsignalized T-junctions during rush hours using Arena software , 2014, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[11]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[12]  Jiaqi Ma,et al.  Speed Harmonization Algorithm Using Connected Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[13]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring the overall and specific crash severity levels at signalized intersections. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Asad J Khattak,et al.  An accident waiting to happen: a spatial approach to proactive pedestrian planning. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[16]  Amir Ghiasi,et al.  Exact Method for a Simplified Trajectory Smoothing Problem with Connected Automated Vehicles , 2017 .

[17]  Saiedeh Razavi,et al.  Impact of Connected Vehicle on Work Zone Network Safety through Dynamic Route Guidance , 2016 .

[18]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Analyzing angle crashes at unsignalized intersections using machine learning techniques. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  Examining the influence of aggressive driving behavior on driver injury severity in traffic crashes. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  OVERVIEW OF PLATOONING SYSTEMS , 2012 .

[21]  Behram Wali,et al.  Effectiveness of enforcement levels of speed limit and drink driving laws and associated factors – Exploratory empirical analysis using a bivariate ordered probit model , 2017 .

[22]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Lili Du,et al.  Information Dissemination Delay in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Networks in a Traffic Stream , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.