Finding Our Way

The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~ 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.

[1]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere , 2006 .

[2]  W. R. Fraser,et al.  Long–term effects of flipper bands on penguins , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Managing wildlife: A spatial information system for GPS collars data , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Wildlife tracking data management: a new vision , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Budden,et al.  Big data and the future of ecology , 2013 .

[6]  S. Tilak,et al.  The Movebank data model for animal tracking , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Stuart Egginton,et al.  Recording long-term heart rate in Paranotothenia angustata using an electronic datalogger , 2005 .

[8]  Roland Kays,et al.  Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior , 2013, Animal Biotelemetry.

[9]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Predicted habitat shifts of Pacific top predators in a changing climate , 2013 .

[10]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Jacqueline L. Frair,et al.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Hawthorne L. Beyer,et al.  The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection , 2014 .

[13]  B. Godley,et al.  Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data , 2005 .

[14]  Stanley M Tomkiewicz,et al.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  William K. Michener,et al.  Meta-information concepts for ecological data management , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[16]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Carly Strasser,et al.  Ecological data in the Information Age , 2012 .

[18]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  The effectiveness of Bayesian state‐space models for estimating behavioural states from movement paths , 2013 .

[19]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Functional responses, Seasonal variation and thresholds in behavioural responses of moose to road density , 2013 .

[21]  Florence Debarre,et al.  The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age , 2013, Current Biology.

[22]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[24]  Jeffrey D. Brawn,et al.  Meta‐analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology , 2010 .

[25]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[26]  Toby A. Patterson,et al.  Developing Integrated Database Systems for the Management of Electronic Tagging Data , 2009 .

[27]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[28]  Peter J. Moore,et al.  Southern royal albatrosses (Diomedea epomophora) injured by bands , 2003 .

[29]  K. M. Schaefer,et al.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean , 2011, Nature.