Continuous Activity Planning for Continuous Traffic Simulation

This paper introduces a microscopic traffic simulation that continuously simulates activity-based agent behavior. Rather than using iterative optimization, which builds on stochastic user equilibria, the simulation uses a continuous planning approach. This approach's behavioral model uses the concept of needs to model human demands. Several intuitive parameters control demand and facilitate calibration of various behaviors. These behaviors originate from a planning heuristic making just-in-time decisions about upcoming activities that an agent should execute. The planning heuristic bases its decisions on agents' current need levels and their short-term development. The model is illustrated through simulation runs, and directions for future research are suggested.

[1]  J. Ben Atkinson,et al.  A Greedy Look-ahead Heuristic for Combinatorial Optimization: An Application to Vehicle Scheduling with Time Windows , 1994 .

[2]  K. Nagel,et al.  Agent-based traffic assignment: going from trips to behavioral travelers , 2009 .

[3]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Generating comprehensive all-day schedules: Ex- panding activity-based travel demand modelling , 2009 .

[4]  David Charypar,et al.  Q-Learning for Flexible Learning of Daily Activity Plans , 2005 .

[5]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[6]  Tobias Kuhnimhof,et al.  Multiday Multiagent Model of Travel Behavior with Activity Scheduling , 2009 .

[7]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks and their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results , 2005 .

[8]  R. Schlich Verhaltenshomogene Gruppen in Längsschnitterhebungen , 2004 .

[9]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Eliciting the Needs that Underlie Activity–Travel Patterns and Their Covariance Structure , 2010 .

[10]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Pushing the limits: A concept of a parallel microsimulation framework , 2010 .

[11]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Travel as a function of (life) projects , 2009 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[13]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Urban rhythms: modelling the rhythms of individual travel behaviour , 2006 .

[14]  George Ioannou,et al.  A greedy look-ahead heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Microsimulation Model , 2008 .

[16]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[17]  K. Axhausen Can we ever obtain the data we would like to have , 1998 .

[18]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[19]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  New Theory of Dynamic Activity Generation , 2006 .

[20]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  New approaches to generating comprehensive all-day activity-travel schedules , 2009 .

[21]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Modelling Short- and Long-Run Household Decision-Making , 2005 .

[22]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life , 2000 .

[23]  C H Chang-Hyeon Joh,et al.  Measuring and predicting adaptation in multidimensional activity-travel patterns , 2004 .

[24]  T. Arentze,et al.  A need-based model of multi-day, multi-person activity generation , 2009 .