How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity

This article analyses the impact of skill portfolios and labour mobility on plant performance by means of a unique database that connects attributes of individuals to features of plants for the whole Swedish economy. We found that a portfolio of related competences at the plant level increases significantly productivity growth of plants, in contrast to plant portfolios consisting of either similar or unrelated competences. Based on the analysis of 101,093 job moves, we found that inflows of skills that are related to the existing knowledge base of the plant had a positive effect on plant performance, while the inflow of new employees with skills that are already present in the plant had a negative impact. Our analyses also show that geographical proximity influences the effect of different skill inflows. Inflows of unrelated skills only contribute positively to plant performance when these are recruited in the same region. Labour mobility across regions only has a positive effect on productivity growth of plants when this concerns new employees with related skills.

[1]  Rakesh Basant,et al.  Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: An Analytical Review of Literature , 2002 .

[2]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[3]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[4]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  DO FIRMS CHANGE CAPABILITIES BY HIRING NEW PEOPLE? A STUDY OF THE ADOPTION OF SCIENCE-BASED DRUG DISCOVERY , 2004 .

[5]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques , 2006 .

[6]  D. Rigby,et al.  Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities , 2002 .

[7]  Philip McCann,et al.  Human capital flows and regional knowledge assets: a simultaneous equation approach , 2006 .

[8]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Gone but not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships , 2006 .

[9]  Bo Wictorin Är kluster lönsamma? : En undersökning av platsens betydelse för företags produktivitet , 2007 .

[10]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[11]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of the U.S. Automobile Industry and Detroit as its Capital , 2001 .

[12]  Jesper B. Sørensen Executive Migration and Interorganizational Competition , 1999 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  B. Lundvall Elgar Companion To Neo-Schumpeterian Economics , 2007 .

[15]  Julia Lane,et al.  Productivity Differences across Employers: The Roles of Employer Size, Age, and Human Capital , 1999 .

[16]  P. Aghion,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice in 'Stig Systems' , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[18]  C. Lawson,et al.  Towards a competence theory of the region , 1999 .

[19]  Ian Richard Gordon,et al.  Duration Dependence in Migration Behaviour: Cumulative Inertia versus Stochastic Change , 1995, Environment & planning A.

[20]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[21]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Entropy statistics and information theory , 2007 .

[22]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[23]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[24]  Jinyoun Kim,et al.  Labor Mobility of Scientists, Technological Diffusion, and the Firm's Patenting Decision , 2001 .

[25]  Dominic Power,et al.  Working through Knowledge Pools: Labour Market Dynamics, the Transference of Knowledge and Ideas, and Industrial Clusters , 2004 .

[26]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Localized mobility clusters: impacts of labour market externalities on firm performance , 2008 .

[27]  P. Combes,et al.  Labor Pooling, Labor Poaching and Spatial Clustering , 2001 .

[28]  Klaus Schömann,et al.  Mobility in Europe , 2006 .

[29]  S. Iammarino,et al.  The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers , 2006 .

[30]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[31]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order , 1999 .

[32]  P. Hallen,et al.  Mobility in Europe. Analysis of the 2005 Eurobarometer survey on geographical and labour market mobility , 2006 .

[33]  Gernot Grabher Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context , 2002 .

[34]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms? , 2001 .

[35]  D. Mackinnon Economic geographies: circuits, flows and spaces , 2006 .

[36]  Frank Neffke,et al.  Revealed Relatedness: Mapping Industry Space , 2008 .

[37]  G. Becker,et al.  Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Education, migration, and job satisfaction: The regional returns of human capital in the EU. Bruges European Economic Research (BEER) Papers 1/November 2004 , 2004 .

[39]  A. Saxenian The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy , 1994 .

[40]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[41]  P. A. Fischer,et al.  Why do People Stay? The Insider Advantages Approach: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Labour Markets , 1998 .

[42]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[43]  J. Christensen Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[44]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[45]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Agglomeration Mobility: Effects of Localisation, Urbanisation, and Scale on Job Changes , 2008 .

[46]  B. Nooteboom Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[47]  P. Aghion,et al.  Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘Stig Systems’: Many Obstacles, But Some Ways Forward , 2007 .

[48]  W. Boeker Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[49]  P. McCann,et al.  Innovation, knowledge spillovers and local labour markets , 2005 .

[50]  D. Rigby,et al.  Technological evolution as creative destruction of process heterogeneity: evidence from US plant-level data , 2005 .

[51]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[52]  Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti,et al.  Structural Change and Economic Growth , 1983 .

[53]  Nick Henry,et al.  Paul Krugman's geographical economics, industrial clustering and the British motor sport industry. , 1999 .

[54]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[55]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 04 The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry , 2005 .

[56]  David P. Cooper,et al.  Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility ☆ , 2001 .