Complexity analysis of source activity underlying the neuromagnetic somatosensory steady-state response

Using the notion of complexity and synchrony, this study presents a data-driven pipeline of nonlinear analysis of neuromagnetic sources reconstructed from human magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected in reaction to vibrostimulation of the right index finger. The dynamics of MEG source activity was reconstructed with synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) beam-forming technique. Considering brain as a complex system, we applied complexity-based tools to identify brain areas with dynamic patterns that remain regular across repeated stimulus presentations, and to characterize their synchronized behavior. Volumetric maps of brain activation were calculated using sample entropy as a measure of signal complexity. The complexity analysis identified activity in the primary somatosensory (SI) area contralateral to stimuli and bilaterally in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as regions with decreased complexity, consistently expressed in a group of subjects. Seeding an activated source with low complexity in the SI area, cross-sample entropy was used to generate synchrony maps. Cross-sample entropy analysis confirmed the synchronized dynamics of neuromagnetic activity between areas SI and PPC, robustly expressed across subjects. Our results extend the understanding of synchronization between co-activated brain regions, focusing on temporal coordination between events in terms of synchronized multidimensional signal patterns.

[1]  Sachiko Koyama,et al.  Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Following Somatosensory Stimulation in Man: Magnetoencephalographic Study Using Spatio-Temporal Source Analysis , 2004, Brain Topography.

[2]  W. Singer,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization , 2007, Science.

[3]  J. Bruhn,et al.  Electroencephalogram Approximate Entropy Correctly Classifies the Occurrence of Burst Suppression Pattern as Increasing Anesthetic Drug Effect , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[4]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[5]  Timothy Bardouille,et al.  MEG imaging of sensorimotor areas using inter-trial coherence in vibrotactile steady-state responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[8]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  S. Pincus.  Approximate entropy (ApEn) as a complexity measure. , 1995, Chaos.

[11]  S Makeig,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Escudero,et al.  Analysis of MEG Background Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Nonlinear Methods and ANFIS , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal , 1983 .

[14]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[15]  N Radhakrishnan,et al.  Estimating regularity in epileptic seizure time-series data. A complexity-measure approach. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[16]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[17]  Fred Tam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[19]  J. Hyvärinen.  Posterior parietal lobe of the primate brain. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[20]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[21]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[22]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Analysis of regularity in the EEG background activity of Alzheimer's disease patients with Approximate Entropy , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[24]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Thomas S. Deisboeck,et al.  Complex systems science in biomedicine , 2006 .

[26]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram recordings in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Sustained Activation of the Human SII Cortices by Stimulus Trains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  A Z Snyder,et al.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Handbook of Brain Connectivity , 2007 .

[31]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Increased Brain Signal Variability Accompanies Lower Behavioral Variability in Development , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..