Design for manual packaging

Packaging costs (direct labor and material) account for a substantial portion of a product's manufactured cost and so it is desirable to minimize these costs. And since major productivity gains have already been realised in manufacturing operations, the last frontier for productivity improvements appears to be in logistics. A formal methodology is therefore proposed to assess the efficiency of manual insertion and packing operations such as folding, insertion, labeling, sealing and scanning. Through this methodology, inefficient packaging operations can be identified and improved upon. This paper also discusses how standard manual handling and insertion times can be computed from raw data collected from industry. These standard manual handling and insertion times form the basis for the computation of the manual packaging efficiency expressed as a packaging index. The closer the index is to 1, the more efficient are the packaging operations. Tables of standard times for labelling, scanning barcodes, sealing with adhesive tape, and insertion into Zip‐Lock™ bags and cardboard boxes with two, three and four flaps are presented. A simple five‐step procedure records the ideal and actual packaging times in a worksheet, from which the packaging efficiency may be computed. The methodology was applied to the packaging of mobile phones, hard disk drives, a desk‐jet printer, a notebook computer, a video cassette recorder and a microwave oven. The packaging efficiencies of the three popular mobile phone models were computed to be 81.5 percent, 76 percent and 74.4 percent. By adopting the best packaging features of two competitor models, it was found that the packaging efficiency of one model of mobile phone could be improved by 13.7 percent. Arising from the research, the authors postulated a general manual packaging line consisting of all conceivable manual packaging operations. This generic manual packaging line is significant in a specific line for a specific product may be quickly configured from it. Finally, arising from the experience of the authors in this research, guidelines for the design of efficient packaging lines are proposed.

[1]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Sun-Woh Lye,et al.  A neural predictive model for characterising impact cushioning curves , 1997 .

[3]  K. Lee.  Polymers for Photonics Applications II , 2002 .

[4]  S.-W. Lye,et al.  The distributive area ratio in determination of protective packaging design configuration , 1997 .

[5]  S. W. Lye,et al.  Automated CAD protective packaging design , 1993, Engineering with Computers.

[6]  David Eckroth,et al.  The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology , 1986 .

[7]  Aaron L. Brody,et al.  The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology , 1997 .

[8]  Geoffrey M. Levy.  Packaging in the Environment , 1995 .

[9]  S. B. Tor,et al.  A parametric study of the shock characteristics of expandable polystyrene foam protective packaging , 1998 .

[10]  Ralph Mosser Barnes,et al.  Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of Work , 1968 .

[11]  Hallie Forcinio,et al.  Handbook of package engineering , 1971 .

[12]  Diana Twede,et al.  THE PROCESS OF LOGISTICAL PACKAGING INNOVATION. , 1992 .

[13]  S. G. Lee,et al.  An investigation into the rapid prototyping of moulds for expanded polystyrene foam , 1996 .

[14]  S. G. Lee,et al.  Adhesives for bead fusion of recycled expandable polystyrene , 2002 .

[15]  S. W. Lye,et al.  An integrated framework for protective packaging design and manufacture , 1994 .

[16]  S. W. Lye,et al.  Associativity modelling of a mould assembly for expandable polystyrene foam , 1996 .

[17]  Frank A. Paine.  The Packaging User’s Handbook , 1990 .

[18]  S.S.G. Lee,et al.  Redesigning protective packaging buffers from the failure modes derived from crack characteristics , 1999 .

[19]  Geoffrey M. Levy.  Packaging, Policy and the Environment , 1999 .