Direct Determination of Rheological Characteristics of Debris Flow

(4) 0 dy where t = shear stress; t0 = Bingham yield stress; m = dynamic viscosity; and du/dy = shear rate. Then, adding coarse particles successively, the concentration of coarse particles was 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, and 0.35, respectively, and the average diameter was 0.55, 1.01, 1.18, and 1.63 mm, respectively. The sedimentations were observed at the range of shear rate 20‐56 s 21 . The larger the effective concentration of slurry, the larger the shear rate of sedimentation. The larger the diameter of coarse particles, the smaller the shear rate of sedimentation. The model of O’Brien and Julien as described by Julien and Lan (1991) was fitted to the rheological curves of nonsedimentation: 2 du du t = t 1 h 1 z (5) y SD dy dy

[1]  P. Julien,et al.  Rheology of Hyperconcentrations , 1991 .

[2]  G. Parker Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers , 1990 .

[3]  D. Cherkauer,et al.  Minimization of power expenditure in a riffle‐pool alluvial channel , 1973 .

[4]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[5]  P. Julien,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow Simulation , 1993 .

[6]  C. Yang Unit Stream Power Equation for Gravel , 1984 .

[7]  K. Whipple,et al.  The influence of debris-flow rheology on fan morphology, Owens Valley, California , 1992 .

[8]  H. Fernholz Boundary Layer Theory , 2001 .

[9]  Jon J. Major,et al.  Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine‐grained slurries , 1992 .

[10]  Charles C. S. Song,et al.  Theory of Minimum Rate of Energy Dissipation , 1979 .

[11]  G. Griffiths Extremal Hypotheses for River Regime: An Illusion of Progress , 1984 .

[12]  Chris Phillips,et al.  Determining rheological parameters of debris flow material , 1991 .

[13]  Howard H. Chang River Morphology and Thresholds , 1985 .

[14]  Prabhata K. Swamee,et al.  Design of a Submarine Oil Pipeline , 1993 .

[15]  R. Bagnold Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  A. Lamberti Dynamic and Variational Approaches to the River Regime Relation , 1992 .

[17]  M. H. Diskin THE LIMITS OF APPLICABILITY OF THE HAZEN-WILLIAMS FORMULA , 1960 .

[18]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  Physical Processes in Geology , 1972 .

[19]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows , 1996 .

[20]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Determination of yield stress fluid behaviour from inclined plane test , 1995 .

[21]  R. Janda,et al.  Perturbation and melting of snow and ice by the 13 November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia, and consequent mobilization, flow and deposition of lahars , 1990 .

[22]  R. P. Chhabra,et al.  Creeping sphere motion in Herschel-Bulkley fluids: flow field and drag , 1995 .

[23]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  On the behavior of fine mud suspensions , 1994 .

[24]  John F. Kennedy,et al.  Reflections on Rivers, Research, and Rouse , 1983 .

[25]  P. Coussot,et al.  A large‐scale field coaxial cylinder rheometer for the study of the rheology of natural coarse suspensions , 1995 .

[26]  P. Coussot,et al.  The effects of an addition of force-free particles on the rheological properties of fine suspensions , 1995 .

[27]  Coussot Structural Similarity and Transition from Newtonian to Non-Newtonian Behavior for Clay-Water Suspensions. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[28]  M. Arattano,et al.  Modelling debris flows as kinematic waves , 1994 .