Empirical analysis of risk-taking behavior in IT platform migration decisions

Information technology (IT) platform migration incurs a great deal of risk because of the massive rewriting of legacy systems and a wide range of new technology adoptions. Therefore IT platform decisions need to be made in a mindful manner because of the high degree of investment risk. However, more aggressive migrations, compared to the global trend, to an open system have been observed in Korean organizations. This phenomenon defies the common understanding of IT investment risk and encourages the investigation of the elusive characteristics underlying IT investment decisions. The effect of IT decision-makers' perceptions and risk propensity on their IT platform migration decisions is examined in the context of risky decisions. In addition to risk perception, decision-makers' risk propensity also has a significant effect on IT investment decisions. By observing the monarchical IT governance and IT-biased careers of decision-makers, some implications of large-scale IT investment decisions are derived.

[1]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[3]  J. March,et al.  Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking , 1987 .

[4]  Kenneth R. MacCrimmon,et al.  Characteristics of risk taking executives , 1990 .

[5]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[6]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[8]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[9]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[10]  D. Fink,et al.  Guidelines for the Successful Adoption of Information Technology in Small and Medium Enterprises , 1998 .

[11]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Michael A. Kole.  Going outside for MIS implementation , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[13]  John C. Anderson,et al.  Assessing Project Implementation Risk: A Methodological Approach , 1979 .

[14]  M. Parker,et al.  Information Economics: Linking Business Performance to Information Technology , 1988 .

[15]  W. Wayt Gibbs,et al.  Software's Chronic Crisis , 1994 .

[16]  J. Thong,et al.  CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .

[17]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  M. Zviran,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction in an outsourcing environment , 1997 .

[19]  Ben Wilson,et al.  Testing Techniques for the Cross-platform Migration of Very Large Interactive Applications , 2007, 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'07).

[20]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Shung-Ming Tang.  An impact factor model of Intranet adoption: an exploratory and empirical research , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[22]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity , 1995 .

[23]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Optimism, Vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview , 1994 .

[24]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Technology Evaluation: Is It Different? , 1992 .

[25]  Fenio Annansingh,et al.  Risk management practices in IS outsourcing: an investigation into commercial banks in Nigeria , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs , 2006 .

[27]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[28]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[29]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[30]  Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al.  Postmortem: Never Leave a Project without It , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[31]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[32]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[33]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[34]  Paul Ati ' Ewell.  TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[35]  Gary Klein,et al.  Risks to different aspects of system success , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[36]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other , 2006 .

[37]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Cs Yap,et al.  Information systems success factors in small business , 1992 .

[39]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[40]  W. Ouchi.  The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control. , 1977 .

[41]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[42]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[43]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[44]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research , 2006 .

[45]  Steve Smithson,et al.  Information systems evaluation as an organizational institution – experience from a case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  Rmh Rob Deitz,et al.  Planning and justifying investments in information technology : a framework with case study illustrations , 1995 .

[47]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Y K ChauPatrick,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of open systems , 1997 .

[49]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Risk assessment and information systems , 1993, ECIS.

[50]  Amy Frederick,et al.  A Review of: English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom (2nd ed.) By Barbara Birch (2007). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 2010 .

[51]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e‐business adoption , 2005 .

[52]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[54]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[55]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior☆ , 1993 .

[56]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[57]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  T. Moynihan,et al.  How Experienced Project Managers Assess Risk , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[59]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Global Technology, Local Adoption: A Cross-Country Investigation of Internet Adoption by Companies in the United States and China , 2004, Electron. Mark..

[60]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[61]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[62]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Propensity to adopt technological innovations: the impact of personal characteristics and organizational context , 1999 .

[63]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  The influence of organization structure and organizational learning factors on the extent of EDI implementation in U.S. firms , 1998 .

[64]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research , 1989 .

[65]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[66]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decisions: A Survey and Evaluation , 1977 .

[67]  James A. Hall,et al.  Financial Performance, CEO Compensation, and Large-Scale Information Technology Outsourcing Decisions , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[69]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[71]  Godwin J. Udo,et al.  Effectiveness of Information System Downsizing , 1994 .