Studying the Flow Dynamics of a Karst Aquifer System with an Equivalent Porous Medium Model

The modeling of groundwater flow in karst aquifers is a challenge due to the extreme heterogeneity of its hydraulic parameters and the duality in their discharge behavior, that is, rapid response of highly conductive karst conduits and delayed drainage of the low‐permeability fractured matrix after recharge events. There are a number of different modeling approaches for the simulation of the karst groundwater dynamics, applicable to different aquifer as well as modeling problem types, ranging from continuum models to double continuum models to discrete and hybrid models. This study presents the application of an equivalent porous model approach (EPM, single continuum model) to construct a steady‐state numerical flow model for an important karst aquifer, that is, the Western Mountain Aquifer Basin (WMAB), shared by Israel and the West‐Bank, using MODFLOW2000. The WMAB was used as a catchment since it is a well‐constrained catchment with well‐defined recharge and discharge components and therefore allows a control on the modeling approach, a very rare opportunity for karst aquifer modeling. The model demonstrates the applicability of equivalent porous medium models for the simulation of karst systems, despite their large contrast in hydraulic conductivities. As long as the simulated saturated volume is large enough to average out the local influence of karst conduits and as long as transport velocities are not an issue, EPM models excellently simulate the observed head distribution. The model serves as a starting basis that will be used as a reference for developing a long‐term dynamic model for the WMAB, starting from the pre‐development period (i.e., 1940s) up to date.

[1]  M. Abusaada Flow Dynamics and Management Options in Stressed Carbonate Aquifer System, The Western Aquifer Basin, Palestine , 2011 .

[2]  H. Gvirtzman,et al.  Effects of Karst and geological structure on groundwater flow: The case of Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer, Israel , 2010 .

[3]  H. Gvirtzman,et al.  Estimating Ground Water Recharge using Flow Models of Perched Karstic Aquifers , 2007, Ground water.

[4]  M. Sauter,et al.  Modellierung der Hydraulik von Karstgrundwasserleitern – Eine Übersicht , 2006 .

[5]  Georg Teutsch,et al.  Modelling karst groundwater hydraulics An overview , 2006 .

[6]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  The salt-water body in the Northern part of Yarkon-Taninim aquifer: Field data analysis, conceptual model and prediction , 2006 .

[7]  Michael E. Barrett,et al.  Can we simulate regional groundwater flow in a karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA , 2003 .

[8]  J. Guttman,et al.  Salinity sources of Kefar Uriya wells in the Judea Group aquifer of Israel. Part 1—conceptual hydrogeological model , 2003 .

[9]  D. Zeitoun,et al.  The Yarkon-Taninim groundwater basin, Israel hydrogeology: case study and critical review , 1994 .

[10]  E. Rosenthal,et al.  The fault pattern in the northern Negev and southern Coastal Plain of Israel and its hydrogeological implications for groundwater flow in the Judea Group aquifer , 1994 .

[11]  Z. Lewy Periodicity of Cretaceous epeirogenic pulses and the disappearance of the carbonate platform facies in Late Cretaceous times (Israel) , 1991 .