Investigating the Functional Role of Callosal Connections with Dynamic Causal Models

The anatomy of the corpus callosum has been described in considerable detail. Tracing studies in animals and human postmortem experiments are currently complemented by diffusion‐weighted imaging, which enables noninvasive investigations of callosal connectivity to be conducted. In contrast to the wealth of anatomical data, little is known about the principles by which interhemispheric integration is mediated by callosal connections. Most importantly, we lack insights into the mechanisms that determine the functional role of callosal connections in a context‐dependent fashion. These mechanisms can now be disclosed by models of effective connectivity that explain neuroimaging data from paradigms that manipulate interhemispheric interactions. In this article, we demonstrate that dynamic causal modeling (DCM), in conjunction with Bayesian model selection (BMS), is a powerful approach to disentangling the various factors that determine the functional role of callosal connections. We first review the theoretical foundations of DCM and BMS before demonstrating the application of these techniques to empirical data from a single subject.

[1]  K. Rockland,et al.  Laminar origins and terminations of cortical connections of the occipital lobe in the rhesus monkey , 1979, Brain Research.

[2]  J. Lanciego,et al.  Current concepts in neuroanatomical tracing , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  M. Segraves,et al.  The afferent and efferent callosal connections of retinotopically defined areas in cat cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  PHRENOLOGY : What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us About Distributed Circuitry ? , 2005 .

[5]  René Westerhausen,et al.  Effects of handedness and gender on macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and its subregions: a combined high-resolution and diffusion-tensor MRI study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  W. D. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Banich The Missing Link: The Role of Interhemispheric Interaction in Attentional Processing , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Focal white matter density changes in schizophrenia: reduced inter-hemispheric connectivity , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Interhemispheric integration: I. Symmetry and convergence of the corticocortical connections of the left and the right principal sulcus (PS) and the left and the right supplementary motor area (SMA) in the rhesus monkey. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  A M Galaburda,et al.  Neuronal asymmetries in primary visual cortex of dyslexic and nondyslexic brains , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[15]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Mapping of Histologically Identified Long Fiber Tracts in Human Cerebral Hemispheres to the MRI Volume of a Reference Brain: Position and Spatial Variability of the Optic Radiation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  W. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Geoffrey J M Parker,et al.  A framework for a streamline‐based probabilistic index of connectivity (PICo) using a structural interpretation of MRI diffusion measurements , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  Network participation indices: characterizing component roles for information processing in neural networks , 2003, Neural Networks.

[19]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  T. Baldeweg,et al.  Mismatch negativity potentials and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[21]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Processes and Lateralized Task Control in the Human Brain , 2003, Science.

[25]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Interhemispheric integration: II. Symmetry and convergence of the corticostriatal projections of the left and the right principal sulcus (PS) and the left and the right supplementary motor area (SMA) of the rhesus monkey. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  M. Young,et al.  Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral localization, then and now , 2003, NeuroImage.

[31]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[32]  I. Gottesman,et al.  The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[33]  I. J. Myung,et al.  When a good fit can be bad , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  S. Arridge,et al.  Detection and modeling of non‐Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Klaas Enno Stephan,et al.  On the role of general system theory for functional neuroimaging , 2004, Journal of anatomy.

[36]  Sabine Weiss,et al.  Cerebral information transfer during word processing: Where and when does it occur and how fast is it? , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[37]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Insights into the functional specificity of the human corpus callosum. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic models of neuronal dynamics , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Interhemispheric transmission of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[43]  W. Singer,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetries of the modular structure in human temporal cortex. , 2000, Science.

[44]  B. O'Brien,et al.  Organization of callosal linkages in visual area V2 of macaque monkey , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[46]  R. Guillery,et al.  On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing "drivers" from "modulators". , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J Bullier,et al.  Organization of the callosal connections of visual areas v1 and v2 in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.