Concept characteristics and variation in lexical diversity in two Dutch dialect areas

Abstract Lexical diversity, the amount of lexical variation shown by a particular concept, varies between concepts. For the concept drunk, for instance, nearly 3000 English expressions exist, including blitzed, intoxicated, and hammered. For the concept sober, however, a significantly smaller number of lexical items is available, like sober or abstinent. While earlier variation studies have revealed that meaning-related concept characteristics correlate with the amount of lexical variation, these studies were limited in scope, being restricted to one semantic field and to one dialect area, that of the Limburgish dialects of Dutch. In this paper, we investigate whether the impact of concept characteristics, viz. vagueness, lack of salience and proneness to affect, is manifest in a similar way in other dialects and other semantic fields. In particular, by extending the scope of the earlier studies to other carefully selected semantic fields, we investigate the generalizability of the impact of concept characteristics to the lexicon as a whole. The quantitative approach that we employ to measure concept characteristics and lexical diversity methodologically advances the study of linguistic variation. Theoretically, this paper contributes to the further development of Cognitive Sociolinguistics by showcasing how meaning can be a source of lexical diversity.

[1]  Agustín Vicente,et al.  Polysemy , 2020, Linguistics.

[2]  Samantha F. McCormick,et al.  Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[3]  H. Schmid Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously , 2016 .

[4]  W. Heeringa,et al.  The relationship between first language acquisition and dialect variation: Linking resources from distinct disciplines in a CLARIN-NL project , 2016 .

[5]  Natalia Levshina,et al.  How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis , 2015 .

[6]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Martijn Wieling,et al.  Analyzing the BBC Voices data: Contemporary English dialect areas and their characteristic lexical variants , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[9]  A. Majid,et al.  Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language , 2014, Cognition.

[10]  Simon Pickl,et al.  Lexical meaning and spatial distribution. Evidence from geostatistical dialectometry , 2013, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[11]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Cognitive Sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch , 2012 .

[13]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[14]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation , 2011, Language Variation and Change.

[15]  Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk,et al.  Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial Categories , 2010 .

[16]  A. Lillo Dickson, Paul. Drunk: The Definitive Drinker’s Dictionary. , 2010 .

[17]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Measuring and parameterizing lexical convergence and divergence between European and Brazilian Portuguese , 2010 .

[18]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Toward a social cognitive linguistics , 2009 .

[19]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[20]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  The Role of Concept Characteristics in Lexical Dialectometry , 2008, Int. J. Humanit. Arts Comput..

[21]  Peter Harder,et al.  The Status of Linguistic Facts: Rethinking the Relation between Cognition, Social Institution and Utterance from a Functional Point of View , 2003 .

[22]  L. Milroy Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change - Working with contemporary speech communities , 2002 .

[23]  C. Sinha,et al.  Language, culture, and the embodiment of spatial cognition , 2001 .

[24]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context , 1994 .

[25]  R. Langacker Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites , 1987 .

[26]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[27]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .

[28]  M. Swadesh Towards Greater Accuracy in Lexicostatistic Dating , 1955, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[29]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  1. Botany meets lexicology: The relationship between experiential salience and lexical diversity , 2019, Dimensions of Diffusion and Diversity.

[30]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[31]  D. Geeraerts Entrenchment as onomasiological salience , 2016 .

[32]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Wat dragen we vandaag: een hemd met blazer of een shirt met jasje? , 2015 .

[33]  F. Vallée-Tourangeau,et al.  How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects. , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Kris Heylen,et al.  Degrees of semantic control in measuring aggregated lexical distances , 2013 .

[35]  P. Trudgill Social Structure, Language Contact and Language Change , 2011 .

[36]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  A statistical method for the identification and aggregation of regional linguistic variation , 2011 .

[37]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Heterodox concept features and onomasiological heterogeneity in dialects , 2010 .

[38]  Gregory R. Guy Sociolinguistics and formal linguistics , 2010 .

[39]  Uri Tadmor,et al.  Loanwords in the world's languages : findings and results , 2009 .

[40]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Usage-based dialectology: Emotion concepts in the Southern Csango dialect , 2008 .

[41]  K. Burridge,et al.  Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language , 2006 .

[42]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  Lectal variation and empirical data in cognitive linguistics , 2005 .

[43]  A. Swanenberg Kolbloemen, bloedpaters en manebladen versus zoetelief en luitentuit. Bronnen van lexicale variatie in de Brabantse flora en fauna , 2004 .

[44]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Profile-Based Linguistic Uniformity as a Generic Method for Comparing Language Varieties , 2003, Comput. Humanit..

[45]  A. Swanenberg Lexicale variatie cognitief-semantisch benaderd: over het benoemen van vogels in Zuid-Nederlandse dialecten , 2000 .

[46]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Convergentie en divergentie in de Nederlandse woordenschat: een onderzoek naar kleding- en voetbaltermen , 1999 .

[47]  D. Geeraerts Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries , 1993 .

[48]  René Dirven,et al.  Cognitive linguistics research , 1990 .

[49]  Critical Enquiry.,et al.  Euphemism, dysphemism, and cross-varietal synonymy. , 1988 .

[50]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[51]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[52]  E. E. Gickling,et al.  The Function of Imagery in Word Recognition Development. , 1978 .

[53]  A. Gorman Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.