Phylogenetically‐conserved candidate genes unify biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships and eco‐evolutionary dynamics across biological scales

The intra‐ and interspecific facets of biodiversity have traditionally been analysed separately, limiting our understanding of how evolution has shaped biodiversity, how biodiversity (as a whole) alters ecological dynamics and hence eco‐evolutionary feedbacks at the community scale. Here, we propose using candidate genes phylogenetically‐conserved across species and sustaining functional traits as an inclusive biodiversity unit transcending the intra‐ and interspecific boundaries. This framework merges knowledge from functional genomics and functional ecology, and we first provide guidelines and a concrete example for identifying phylogenetically‐conserved candidate genes (PCCGs) within communities and for measuring biodiversity from PCCGs. We then explain how biodiversity measured at PCCGs can be linked to ecosystem functions, which unifies recent observations that both intra‐ and interspecific biodiversity are important for ecosystem functions. We then highlight the eco‐evolutionary processes shaping PCCG diversity patterns and argue that their respective role can be inferred from concepts derived from population genetics. Finally, we explain how PCCGs may shift the field of eco‐evolutionary dynamics from a focal‐species approach to a more realistic focal‐community approach. This framework provides a novel perspective to investigate the global ecosystem consequences of diversity loss across biological scales, and how these ecological changes further alter biodiversity evolution.

[1]  Matthew A. Barbour,et al.  A keystone gene underlies the persistence of an experimental food web , 2022, Science.

[2]  J. P. Spence,et al.  Monitoring rapid evolution of plant populations at scale with Pool-Sequencing , 2022, bioRxiv.

[3]  M. McPeek,et al.  Integrating fundamental processes to understand eco‐evolutionary community dynamics and patterns , 2021, Functional Ecology.

[4]  Hugo Flávio,et al.  Fishing for DNA? Designing baits for population genetics in target enrichment experiments: Guidelines, considerations and the new tool supeRbaits , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.

[5]  A. Estoup,et al.  f-statistics estimation and admixture graph construction with Pool-Seq or allele count data using the R package poolfstat , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  B. Vanschoenwinkel,et al.  We should not necessarily expect positive relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in observational field data. , 2021, Ecology letters.

[7]  O. Honnay,et al.  Life history, climate and biogeography interactively affect worldwide genetic diversity of plant and animal populations , 2021, Nature Communications.

[8]  A. Wysocka,et al.  Continental-scale patterns of hyper-cryptic diversity within the freshwater model taxon Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea, Amphipoda) , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Montoya,et al.  Intraspecific diversity loss in a predator species alters prey community structure and ecosystem functions , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Linking microbial communities to ecosystem functions: what we can learn from genotype–phenotype mapping in organisms , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[11]  S. Manel,et al.  Global determinants of freshwater and marine fish genetic diversity , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Scaling‐up biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning research , 2020, Ecology letters.

[13]  P. David,et al.  How community adaptation affects biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships , 2019, bioRxiv.

[14]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  The foraging Gene and Its Behavioral Effects: Pleiotropy and Plasticity. , 2019, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Trait variation across biological scales shapes community structure and ecosystem function. , 2019, Ecology.

[16]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Linking microbial communities to ecosystem functions: what we can learn from genotype-phenotype mapping in organisms , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  O. Andreassen,et al.  A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits , 2019, Nature Genetics.

[18]  P. Khaitovich,et al.  Gene expression across mammalian organ development , 2019, Nature.

[19]  F. Maestre,et al.  Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Abigail A. Scholer,et al.  Self-regulation and the foraging gene (PRKG1) in humans , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  E. Decaestecker,et al.  Analysing eco‐evolutionary dynamics—The challenging complexity of the real world , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[22]  A. Hendry A critique for eco‐evolutionary dynamics , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[23]  S. Blanchet,et al.  The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[24]  P. Niklaus,et al.  A plant biodiversity effect resolved to a single chromosomal region , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[25]  Charles C. Y. Xu,et al.  Keystone Genes. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  A. Lecerf,et al.  Phenotypic determinants of inter-individual variability of litter consumption rate in a detritivore population , 2018, Oikos.

[27]  G. Theißen,et al.  Array of MADS-Box Genes: Facilitator for Rapid Adaptation? , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[28]  Martijn Egas,et al.  Eco‐evolutionary feedbacks—Theoretical models and perspectives , 2018, Functional Ecology.

[29]  S. Schilling,et al.  MADS-box genes and crop domestication: the jack of all traits , 2018, Journal of experimental botany.

[30]  M. Fortin,et al.  Diversity from genes to ecosystems: A unifying framework to study variation across biological metrics and scales , 2018, Evolutionary applications.

[31]  M. Schmid,et al.  Evidence for rapid evolution in a grassland biodiversity experiment , 2018, bioRxiv.

[32]  Andrew P Hendry,et al.  What genomic data can reveal about eco-evolutionary dynamics , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[33]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Epigenetic mechanisms modulate differences in Drosophila foraging behavior , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  B. Faircloth Identifying conserved genomic elements and designing universal bait sets to enrich them , 2017 .

[35]  Jinmi Yoon,et al.  The control of flowering time by environmental factors , 2017, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[36]  M. Reichelt,et al.  Poplar MYB115 and MYB134 Transcription Factors Regulate Proanthocyanidin Synthesis and Structure1[OPEN] , 2017, Plant Physiology.

[37]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Population Genetics and Demography Unite Ecology and Evolution. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  C. Martin,et al.  Novel Candidate Genes Underlying Extreme Trophic Specialization in Caribbean Pupfishes , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  A. Hendry,et al.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  T. Høye,et al.  An ecological function in crisis? The temporal overlap between plant flowering and pollinator function shrinks as the Arctic warms , 2016 .

[41]  P. Morin,et al.  Evolution alters the consequences of invasions in experimental communities , 2016, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[42]  K. Helgen,et al.  In‐solution hybridization for mammalian mitogenome enrichment: pros, cons and challenges associated with multiplexing degraded DNA , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[43]  J. Prunier,et al.  Lessons from the fish: a multi-species analysis reveals common processes underlying similar species-genetic diversity correlations , 2016 .

[44]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  J. Good,et al.  Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[46]  S. Lien,et al.  Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon , 2015, Nature.

[47]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[48]  C. Violle,et al.  Complementary effects of species and genetic diversity on productivity and stability of sown grasslands , 2015, Nature Plants.

[49]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  Sequencing pools of individuals — mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  M. Vellend,et al.  Drawing ecological inferences from coincident patterns of population‐ and community‐level biodiversity , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[51]  Johan van de Koppel,et al.  Under niche construction: an operational bridge between ecology, evolution, and ecosystem science , 2014 .

[52]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Supergenes and Complex Phenotypes , 2014, Current Biology.

[53]  G. Theißen,et al.  Phylogenomics of MADS-Box Genes in Plants — Two Opposing Life Styles in One Gene Family , 2013, Biology.

[54]  J. Marden,et al.  GENETIC VARIATION IN HIF SIGNALING UNDERLIES QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND LIFE‐HISTORY TRAITS WITHIN LOWLAND BUTTERFLY POPULATIONS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Genetic diversity in widespread species is not congruent with species richness in alpine plant communities. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[56]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[57]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change , 2012 .

[58]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  D. Tilman,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability , 2012 .

[60]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[61]  A. Phillimore,et al.  Species Interactions Alter Evolutionary Responses to a Novel Environment , 2012, PLoS biology.

[62]  P. J. van der Zaag,et al.  Targeted enrichment of genomic DNA regions for next-generation sequencing , 2011, Briefings in functional genomics.

[63]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[64]  T. Thomas,et al.  Bacterial community assembly based on functional genes rather than species , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Mridul K Thomas,et al.  Toward an integration of evolutionary biology and ecosystem science. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[66]  K. Hambright,et al.  Variation in resource consumption across a gradient of increasing intra- and interspecific richness. , 2011, Ecology.

[67]  T. Schoener The Newest Synthesis: Understanding the Interplay of Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics , 2011, Science.

[68]  P. Venail,et al.  Experimental niche evolution alters the strength of the diversity–productivity relationship , 2011, Nature.

[69]  N. Loeuille Influence of evolution on the stability of ecological communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[70]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[71]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Community and ecosystem effects of intraspecific genetic diversity in grassland microcosms of varying species diversity. , 2010, Ecology.

[72]  Emily H Turner,et al.  Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing , 2010, Nature Methods.

[73]  Allan Konopka,et al.  What is microbial community ecology? , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[74]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[75]  L. Keller,et al.  Pleiotropy in the melanocortin system, coloration and behavioural syndromes. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  David Meinke,et al.  Identifying essential genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2008, Trends in plant science.

[77]  L. Jost GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[78]  A. Hendry,et al.  Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[79]  Jinzhong Fu,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of the genus Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[80]  G. Weinstock,et al.  Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization , 2007, Nature Methods.

[81]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[82]  B. Potts,et al.  A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[83]  P. Reich,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment , 2006, Nature.

[84]  M. Vellend,et al.  Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity , 2005 .

[85]  M. Vellend Species Diversity and Genetic Diversity: Parallel Processes and Correlated Patterns , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[86]  Boris Worm,et al.  Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[88]  Mark J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[89]  R. Frankham,et al.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[91]  J. Stachowicz,et al.  Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  Thomas Lübberstedt,et al.  Functional markers in plants. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[93]  Dylan G. Fischer,et al.  COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM GENETICS: A CONSEQUENCE OF THE EXTENDED PHENOTYPE , 2003 .

[94]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[95]  M. O’Donovan,et al.  DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[96]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Drosophila: Genetics meets behaviour , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[97]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[98]  J Norberg,et al.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[99]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[100]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  J. N. Thompson,et al.  Rapid evolution as an ecological process. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[102]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[103]  F. Chapin,et al.  Biotic Control over the Functioning of Ecosystems , 1997 .

[104]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[105]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[106]  W. Nacken,et al.  Genetic Control of Flower Development by Homeotic Genes in Antirrhinum majus , 1990, Science.

[107]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Genetic localization of foraging (for): a major gene for larval behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1989, Genetics.

[108]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[109]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[110]  Andriy A. Struka,et al.  Self-regulation and the foraging gene ( PRKG 1 ) in humans , 2019 .

[111]  D. Flynn,et al.  Community evolution increases plant productivity at low diversity. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[112]  A. Baselga Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[113]  Michael D. Collins,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 Tables S1 and S2 References Plant Genotypic Diversity Predicts Community Structure and Governs an Ecosystem Process , 2022 .