The Emergence and Evolution of the Multidimensional Organization

The M-form, in which a corporate parent manages relatively freestanding business units, was the most successful organizational design of the twentieth century. However, contemporary economic conditions call for designs that allow firms to exploit synergies across their business units and on this dimension the M-form is notoriously weak. We report on empirical research that highlights the fundamental tension between clear lines of authority and the exploitation of synergies that firms face as they move away from the M-form and implement shared service centers, corporate account management, and matrix organizations. However, we also found that a limited but substantial number of firms in our sample evolved organizational designs that signal a new way of resolving this tension. These firms are organized around multiple dimensions (e.g. region, product, and account) and are able to simultaneously hold different managers accountable for performance on these dimensions. We discuss the nature of this multidimensional organization form by contrasting it with the M-form and the matrix organization. The multidimensional organization is best understood as the next step in the evolution from a resource centric physical production model to a customer centric knowledge exploitation model. It is a way of organizing that seems particularly well adapted to stimulating the teamwork that is necessary to create economic value in complex markets on the basis of distributed knowledge and intangible resources.

[1]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Matrix Organizations that Actually Work: How IBM, Procter & Gamble and Others Design for Success , 2008 .

[2]  Sam Palmisano The Globally Integrated Enterprise , 2006 .

[3]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Customer-Centric Organization: A Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process , 2005 .

[4]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[5]  L. Pil The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[6]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Structured Networks: Towards the Well-Designed Matrix , 2003 .

[7]  Winfried Ruigrok,et al.  ABB: Beyond the Global Matrix towards the Network Multidivisional Organization , 2000 .

[8]  Christian Berggren,et al.  Building a truly global organization? ABB and the problems of integrating a multi-domestic enterprise , 1996 .

[9]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Beyond the M-form: toward a managerial theory of the firm , 1993 .

[10]  P. Drucker The new society of organizations. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[11]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[12]  A. Campbell,et al.  Strategies and styles : the role of the centre in managing diversified corporations , 1989 .

[13]  M. Porter From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[14]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[15]  Paolo Leon The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[16]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[17]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[18]  Christopher A. Bartlett,et al.  HOW MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EVOLVE , 1982 .

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[20]  Russell L. Ackoff Towards flexible organizations: A multidimensional design , 1977 .

[21]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[22]  Alfred P. Sloan,et al.  My years with General Motors , 1964 .