Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy Iv Asp Conference Series, Vol. **volume**, 2007 Bayesian Model Selection and Extrasolar Planet Detection

The discovery of nearly 200 extrasolar planets during the last decade has revitalized scientific interest in the physics of planet formation and ushered in a new era for astronomy. Astronomers searching for the small signals induced by planets inevitably face significant statistical challenges. For example, radial velocity (RV) planet searches (that have discovered most of the known planets) are increasingly finding planets with small velocity amplitudes, with long orbital periods, or in multiple planet systems. Bayesian inference has the potential to improve the interpretation of existing observations, the planning of future observations and ultimately inferences concerning the overall population of planets. The main obstacle to applying Bayesian inference to extrasolar planet searches is the need to develop computationally efficient algorithms for calculating integrals over high-dimensional parameter spaces. In recent years, the refinement of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms has made it practical to accurately characterize orbital parameters and their uncertainties from RV observations of single-planet and weakly interacting multiple-planet systems. Unfortunately, MCMC is not sufficient for Bayesian model selection, i.e., comparing the marginal posterior probability of models with different parameters , as is necessary to determine how strongly the observational data favor a model with n + 1 planets over a model with just n planets. Many of the obvious estimators for the marginal posterior probability suffer from poor convergence properties. We compare several estimators of the marginal likelihood and feature those that display desirable convergence properties based on the analysis of a sample data set for HD 88133b Fischer et al. (2005). We find that methods based on importance sampling are most efficient, provided that a good analytic approximation of the posterior probability distribution is available. We present a simple algorithm for using a sample from the posterior to construct a mixture distribution that approximates the posterior and can be used for importance sampling and Bayesian model selection. We conclude with some suggestions for the development and refinement of computationally efficient and robust estima-tors of marginal posterior probabilities.

[1]  James O. Berger,et al.  Current Challenges in Bayesian Model Choice , 2007 .

[2]  S. Ravi Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: a Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , 2007 .

[3]  J. Skilling Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .

[4]  R. Paul Butler,et al.  The N2K Consortium. VI. Doppler Shifts without Templates and Three New Short-Period Planets , 2006, astro-ph/0604348.

[5]  E. Ford,et al.  The Relationship between Hot Jupiters and the Tidal Limit , 2006 .

[6]  Eric B. Ford,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Analyzing the Orbits of Extrasolar Planets , 2005, astro-ph/0512634.

[7]  P. Gregory A Bayesian Analysis of Extrasolar Planet Data for HD 73526 , 2005 .

[8]  J. Wright,et al.  Radial Velocity Jitter in Stars from the California and Carnegie Planet Search at Keck Observatory , 2005, astro-ph/0505214.

[9]  Eric B. Ford,et al.  Planet–planet scattering in the upsilon Andromedae system , 2005, Nature.

[10]  Jason T. Wright,et al.  The N2K Consortium. I. A Hot Saturn Planet Orbiting HD 88133 , 2005 .

[11]  R. P. Butler,et al.  The GJ 876 Planetary System: A Progress Report , 2004, astro-ph/0407441.

[12]  E. Ford ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS FOR PLANET SEARCHES , 2004, astro-ph/0412703.

[13]  A. Cumming Detectability of extrasolar planets in radial velocity surveys , 2004, astro-ph/0408470.

[14]  Yuxiang Zhai,et al.  Bayesian inference and maximum entropy methods in science and engineering : 23rd International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering : Jackson Hole, Wyoming 3-8 August 2003 , 2004 .

[15]  E. Ford QUANTIFYING THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE ORBITS OF EXTRASOLAR PLANETS , 2003, astro-ph/0305441.

[16]  A. Owen,et al.  Safe and Effective Importance Sampling , 2000 .

[17]  A. Rukhin Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis , 1997 .

[18]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[20]  B. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Model Choice Via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods , 1995 .

[21]  Man-Suk Oh,et al.  Integration of Multimodal Functions by Monte Carlo Importance Sampling , 1993 .

[22]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[23]  S. Baliunas,et al.  A Prescription for period analysis of unevenly sampled time series , 1986 .