Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions.

Surfaces were produced with defined topographical features and surface chemistry. Silicon wafers, and wafers with attached nucleopore filters and quantifoils were coated with titanium using ion beam sputtering technology. Irregularly spaced, but regularly featured surface pits, sizes 0.2 and 0.5 microm, and regularly spaced pits with regular features (1 and 2 microm) diameter were produced. The smallest surface feature that could be successfully produced using this system was of diameter 0.2 microm. Ra, the average absolute deviation of the roughness irregularities from the mean line over one sampling length, Rz, the difference in height between the average of the five highest peaks, and the five lowest valleys along the assessment length of the profile and surface area values increased with surface feature size, with Ra values of 0.04-0.217 microm. There was no significant difference between the contact angles observed for smooth titanium surfaces with 0.2 and 0.5 microm features. However, a significant difference in contact angle was observed between the 1 and 2 microm featured surfaces (p<0.005). Substrata were used in microbial retention assays, using a range of unrelated, differently sized microorganisms. Staphylococcus aureus (cells 0.5-1 microm diameter) were retained in the highest numbers. S. aureus was well retained in the 0.5 microm sized pits and began to accumulate within larger surface features. Rod shaped Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1 microm x 3 microm) were preferentially retained, often end on, within the 1 microm surface features. Some daughter cells of Candida albicans blastospores were retained in 2 microm pits. For S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, the greatest numbers of cells were retained in the largest (2 microm) surface features. The number of C. albicans was similar across all the surfaces. The use of defined surfaces in microbial retention assays may lead to a better understanding of the interaction occurring between cells and surface features.

[1]  J. Verran,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to inert thermoplastic surfaces , 1996 .

[2]  H. Müller-Steinhagen,et al.  Influence of augmented surfaces and of surface finish on particulate fouling in double pipe heat exchangers , 1990 .

[3]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids , 1984 .

[4]  J. Remon,et al.  Kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion to 304 and 316-L stainless steel: role of cell surface hydrophobicity , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  J. Weimer,et al.  Effect of passivation and dry heat-sterilization on surface energy and topography of unalloyed titanium implants , 1998 .

[6]  A F von Recum,et al.  Texturing of polymer surfaces at the cellular level. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[7]  H. Freese,et al.  Metallurgy and Technological Properties of Titanium and Titanium Alloys , 2001 .

[8]  J. Verran,et al.  The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethyl methacrylate , 1998, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  Robert D. Boyd,et al.  Use of the atomic force microscope to determine the effect of substratum surface topography on bacterial adhesion , 2002 .

[10]  R. Boyd,et al.  Visualization and measurement of nanometer dimension surface features using dental impression materials and atomic force microscopy , 2003 .

[11]  R. Boyd,et al.  The cleanability of stainless steel as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , 2001 .

[12]  P. J. Holloway.  Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves , 1970 .

[13]  Eugene Rosenberg,et al.  Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell‐surface hydrophobicity , 1980 .

[14]  E. Lesniewska,et al.  Correlating surface forces with surface reactivity of gypsum crystals by atomic force microscopy. Comparison with rheological properties of plaster , 2001 .

[15]  L. Melo,et al.  Biofilms--science and technology , 1992 .

[16]  Paul Gatenholm,et al.  Microtextured surfaces: Towards macrofouling resistant coatings , 1999 .

[17]  B. Kasemo.  Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  P Lambrechts,et al.  Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. , 1997, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  J. Verran,et al.  Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  C. Suryanarayana,et al.  Non-Equilibrium Processing of Materials , 1999 .

[21]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Microfabricated metal and oxide fibers for biological applications , 1995 .

[22]  S. Flint,et al.  A modified selective medium for the detection of Pseudomonas species that cause spoilage of milk and dairy products , 1996 .

[23]  J. Holah,et al.  Cleanability in relation to bacterial retention on unused and abraded domestic sink materials. , 1990, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[24]  R. Boyd,et al.  The effect of nanometer dimension topographical features on the hygienic status of stainless steel. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[25]  R. Boyd,et al.  The relationship between substratum surface roughness and microbiological and organic soiling: A review , 2001 .

[26]  John D. Brooks,et al.  Biofilms in dairy manufacturing plant‐description, current concerns and methods of control , 1997 .

[27]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Effects of Substratum Topography on Bacterial Adhesion. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[28]  M. Mantel,et al.  Influence of the surface chemistry on the wettability of stainless steel , 1994 .

[29]  P Descouts,et al.  Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  Extrand,et al.  An Experimental Study of Contact Angle Hysteresis , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[31]  Stephen Y. Chou,et al.  Imprint of sub-25 nm vias and trenches in polymers , 1995 .

[32]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  D. Cochran,et al.  Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  Marcus Textor,et al.  Titanium in Medicine : material science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications , 2001 .

[35]  R. Boyd,et al.  The use of the atomic force microscope to visualise and measure wear of food contact surfaces , 2000 .

[36]  A F von Recum,et al.  Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: texture orientation into or out of the surface. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Multiple surface properties of worn RGP lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[38]  Hans Müller-Steinhagen,et al.  Investigation of low fouling surface alloys made by ion implantation technology , 1997 .

[39]  Gun Wirtanen,et al.  Biofilm formation in the industry: A review , 1992 .

[40]  L. Boulané-Petermann.  Processes of bioadhesion on stainless steel surfaces and cleanability: A review with special reference to the food industry. , 1996, Biofouling.

[41]  A F von Recum,et al.  Macrophage response to microtextured silicone. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[42]  Richard Skalak,et al.  The interface zone of inorganic implantsIn vivo: Titanium implants in bone , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  A. Rutenberg,et al.  Microbial response to surface microtopography: the role of metabolism in localized mineral dissolution , 2001 .