Rapid prototyping process selection using multi criteria decision making considering environmental criteria and its decision support system

Purpose Rapid prototyping (RP) has been given focus during dynamic market conditions, as it largely helps to compress product development time. RP contains the potential to achieve environmentally friendlier operations. However, RP processes are not environmentally friendlier, as the possibilities of toxicological health and environmental risks while handling and disposing of raw material remain unresolved. This study aims to select environmentally friendlier processes without compromising required mechanical properties. Some of the RP processes considered in this study are selective laser sintering (SLS), stereo lithography apparatus (SLA), three-dimensional printing (3DP) and laser engineered net shaping (LENS). Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model comprising 25 criteria (both traditional and environmental) has been developed. An expert team was formed to evaluate the environmental performance of RP processes using the developed conceptual model. Analytic network process–technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution-based hybrid methodology has been adopted for this purpose. Further, to overcome ambiguity and subjectivity nature of judgment, fuzzy set concepts have been adopted. Finally, a decision support system has been developed using MATLAB software to mitigate the associated computational difficulty. Findings The detailed analysis of criterion weights revealed that the expert team has assigned higher importance to environmental criteria over traditional criteria. Based on environmental considerations, ranking has been generated as SLA-SLS-3DP-LENS. Research limitations/implications Only point-to-point and discrete fusion-based RP process have been considered in this study to demonstrate the developed conceptual model. Also, expert knowledge has been taken to rate some of the environmental criteria. In the near future, by conducting environmental studies, these criteria can be substituted with real data to improve accuracy of RP process selection. Originality/value Reported studies in RP process selection in literature were conducted considering mainly the various traditional criteria. In this study, the environmental criteria have also been considered along with traditional criteria. This study takes the initiative toward sustainability studies in RP processes. Also, detailed inferences have been derived and the results have been compared with the existing studies and this is the novel contribution of this study.

[1]  Ryan Brown,et al.  Selecting Rapid Prototyping Systems , 2002 .

[2]  Xue Yan,et al.  PII: 0010-4485(95)00035-6 , 2003 .

[3]  I. K. Hui,et al.  A multiple-criteria environmental impact assessment for the plastic injection molding process : a methodology , 2003 .

[4]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping , 1998 .

[5]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[6]  T. Saaty,et al.  Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1998 .

[7]  H. Lan *,et al.  Decision support system for rapid prototyping process selection through integration of fuzzy synthetic evaluation and an expert system , 2005 .

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  H. W. Straub PROTECTION OF THE HUMAN EYE FROM LASER RADIATION , 1965, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2011, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[12]  Delcie R. Durham,et al.  Environmentally benign manufacturing: Current practice and future trends , 2002 .

[13]  Gideon Levy,et al.  RAPID MANUFACTURING AND RAPID TOOLING WITH LAYER MANUFACTURING (LM) TECHNOLOGIES, STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 2003 .

[14]  Michael J. Ellenbecker,et al.  A Proposal for Measuring Business Sustainability , 2000 .

[15]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[16]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight , 2006 .

[18]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[19]  Huan-Jyh Shyur,et al.  COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[20]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[22]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies , 1998 .

[23]  Joseph Pegna,et al.  Environmental impacts of rapid prototyping: an overview of research to date , 2006 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[25]  Anderson Vicente Borille,et al.  Applying decision methods to select rapid prototyping technologies , 2010 .

[26]  Uwe Kaschka,et al.  Selection and evaluation of rapid tooling process chains with Protool , 2000 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach , 2007 .

[29]  Richard Florida,et al.  Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing , 1996 .

[30]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Design for environment analyses applied to rapid manufacturing , 2006 .

[31]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  A rule based expert system for rapid prototyping system selection , 2002 .

[32]  Bruce C. Larson,et al.  A fuzzy set approach to the problem of sustainability , 1999 .

[33]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Thirty criteria based leanness assessment using fuzzy logic approach , 2012 .

[34]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[35]  Carles Riba Romeva,et al.  A concurrent Rapid Manufacturing advice system , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[36]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  H. S. Byun,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method , 2005 .

[38]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[39]  Antonio Armillotta,et al.  Selection of layered manufacturing techniques by an adaptive AHP decision model , 2008 .

[40]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks , 2004 .

[41]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  Agility index in the supply chain , 2006 .

[43]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  A management-support technique for the selection of Rapid Prototyping Technologies , 1999 .

[44]  Joaquim Lloveras,et al.  Development of an AI-based Rapid Manufacturing Advice System , 2010 .

[45]  Feng Lin,et al.  Rapid prototyping and manufacturing technology: Principle, representative technics, applications, and development trends , 2009 .

[46]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic , 2006 .

[47]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Composites by rapid prototyping technology , 2010 .

[48]  C. Seepersad,et al.  A comparison of the energy efficiency of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts , 2012 .

[49]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider , 2009 .