Lectal constraining of lexical collocations. How a word's company is influenced by the usage settings

Adopting a corpus-based approach, lexical collocations are reconsidered from a lectal perspective. Analyzing adjective-noun collocations, it will be shown that lexical collocations are conditioned by the language settings in which they are used. These lectal constraints do not only apply to lexical collocations as a measure of lexical association but also to their potential function as a determinant of other constructions. These results argue for the inclusion of the heterogeneity of the corpus settings in empirical linguistic models and for the integration of a full-fledged lectal dimension in theoretical frameworks advocating a usage-based methodology, such as construction grammar.

[1]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Language is never, ever, ever, random , 2005 .

[2]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis : linguistic variation in text and speech , 2014 .

[3]  Doris Schönefeld.  It is … quite common for theoretical predictions to go untested (BNC_CMH). A register-specific analysis of the English go un-V-en construction , 2013 .

[4]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[5]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[6]  Jack Grieve.  A comparison of statistical methods for the aggregation of regional linguistic variation , 2014 .

[7]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Sources of variability relevant to the cognitive sociolinguist, and corpus- as well as psycholinguistic methods and notions to handle them , 2013 .

[8]  Ted Dunning,et al.  Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence , 1993, CL.

[9]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Spurious effects in variational corpus linguistics: Identification and implications of confounding , 2014 .

[10]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Compound or phrase? Analogy in naming , 2011 .

[11]  Kris Heylen,et al.  Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art , 2005 .

[12]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Profile-Based Linguistic Uniformity as a Generic Method for Comparing Language Varieties , 2003, Comput. Humanit..

[13]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  A variationist account of constituent ordering in presentative sentences in Belgian Dutch , 2007 .

[14]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[15]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next … , 2013 .

[16]  Dirk Speelman,et al.  Lexical patterning in a construction grammar: The effect of lexical co-occurrence patterns on the inflectional variation in Dutch attributive adjectives , 2009 .

[17]  Henri Cohen,et al.  Speech Development in Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[18]  D. Speelman,et al.  Towards a 3D-grammar: Interaction of linguistic and extralinguistic factors in the use of Dutch causative constructions , 2013 .

[19]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Contexts and usage in Cognitive Sociolinguistics , 2013 .

[20]  Tore Nesset,et al.  Capturing correlational structure in Russian paradigms: A case study in logistic mixed-effects modeling , 2010 .

[21]  Frank Keller,et al.  Using the Web to Obtain Frequencies for Unseen Bigrams , 2003, CL.

[22]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  COLLOCATIONS AND SEMANTIC PROFILES: ON THE CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE WITH QUANTITATIVE STUDIES , 1995 .

[23]  A. Onysko,et al.  Adjective + Noun constructions between syntax and word formation in Dutch and German , 2010 .

[24]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[25]  J. Odijk,et al.  Uninflected adjectives in Dutch , 1992 .

[26]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[27]  Geert Booij.  Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon , 2002 .

[28]  J. Fox.  Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models , 2003 .

[29]  Gitte Kristiansen.  Style-shifting and shifting styles: A socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation , 2008 .

[30]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[31]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice , 2012, Language Variation and Change.

[32]  Geert Booij,et al.  Phrasal names: A constructionist analysis1 , 2009 .

[33]  Andrew Kehoe,et al.  Weaving web data into a diachronic corpus patchwork , 2009 .

[34]  C. Mair.  Varieties of English around the world: Collocational and cultural profiles , 2007 .

[35]  A. Blom.  het ondoorgrondelijk bijvoeglijk naamwoord , 1994 .

[36]  William Labov,et al.  Some principles of linguistic methodology , 1972, Language in Society.

[37]  Frank Van Eynde.  Morpho-Syntactic Agreement and Index Agreement in Dutch NPs , 2002, CLIN.

[38]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  The English genitive alternation in a cognitive sociolinguistics perspective , 2010 .

[39]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics , 2010 .

[40]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Methodological issues in corpus-based cognitive linguistics , 2008 .