Comparison of the effectiveness of saturation pulses in the heart at 3T

Cardiac MRI at 3T provides a means to increase the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) for first‐pass perfusion MRI. However, both the static magnetic field (B0) and radio frequency (RF) field (B1) variations within the heart are comparatively higher at 3T than at 1.5T. The increased field variations can degrade the performance of a single rectangular saturation pulse that is conventionally used for magnetization preparation. The accuracy of T1‐weighted signal measurement depends on the uniformity of the magnetization saturation. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative effectiveness of the rectangular, pulse train, and adiabatic composite (BIR‐4) saturation pulses in the human heart at 3T. In volunteers, after nominal saturation, the mean residual magnetization within the left ventricle (LV) was different between all three pulses (0.13 ± 0.06 vs. 0.03 ± 0.02 vs. 0.03 ± 0.01, respectively; P < 0.001). Within paired groups, the mean residual magnetization was significantly higher for the rectangular pulse than for either the pulse train and BIR‐4 pulses (P < 0.001), but not different between the pulse train and BIR‐4 pulses. The performances of all three saturation pulses were comparatively poorer in the right ventricle (RV) than in the LV, respectively. Magn Reson Med, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[2]  T. Parrish,et al.  3-D FLASH imaging using a single surface coil and a new adiabatic pulse, BIR-4. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[3]  R. Edelman,et al.  First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  B1 Insensitive Adiabatic RF Pulses , 1992 .

[5]  W J Manning,et al.  Studies of Gd‐DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  S. Arridge,et al.  Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  K Uğurbil,et al.  Fast anatomical imaging of the heart and assessment of myocardial perfusion with arrhythmia insensitive magnetization preparation , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R. Balaban,et al.  Simulation of B1 field distribution and intrinsic signal-to-noise in cardiac MRI as a function of static magnetic field. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  H. Wen,et al.  Simulation ofB1Field Distribution and Intrinsic Signal-to-Noise in Cardiac MRI as a Function of Static Magnetic Field , 1997 .

[10]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Motion and deformation tracking for short-axis echo-planar myocardial perfusion imaging , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  F. Epstein,et al.  Improved coverage in dynamic contrast‐enhanced cardiac MRI using interleaved gradient‐echo EPI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  E Fleck,et al.  New developments in non-invasive cardiac imaging: critical assessment of the clinical role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, European heart journal.

[14]  E R McVeigh,et al.  In vivo measurement of T*2 and field inhomogeneity maps in the human heart at 1.5 T , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  H. Rinneberg,et al.  Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  L DelaBarre,et al.  The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR. , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  M. Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  M. Schmitt,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation‐prepared TrueFISP , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  R. Balaban,et al.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high‐dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  David M Higgins,et al.  Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Leon Axel,et al.  B0 and B1‐insensitive uniform T1‐weighting for quantitative, first‐pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .

[23]  D. Parker,et al.  On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Leon Axel,et al.  B(0) and B(1)-insensitive uniform T(1)-weighting for quantitative, first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Yi Wang,et al.  Myocardial first pass perfusion: Steady‐state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  J. Mintorovitch,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Huanzhou Yu,et al.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  L. Axel,et al.  Multislice, dual‐imaging sequence for increasing the dynamic range of the contrast‐enhanced blood signal and CNR of myocardial enhancement at 3T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.