Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration

Retinal implants that deliver longer pulses of electrical current may markedly improve image sharpness for blind individuals. Sharper sight with sustained stimuli As their photoreceptors degenerate, people with retinitis pigmentosa lose their vision. The retinal implants now in clinical use can help; these devices respond to light and deliver an electrical stimulus directly to the remaining cells in the retina and thereby to the visual centers of the brain. But current technology only enables patients to sense the presence or absence of light or, for some, large objects. Weitz et al. show that increasing the duration of the stimulus to the residual cells can markedly improve performance. Experiments in isolated retinas from an animal model reveal why this works: longer stimuli do not inadvertently activate passing axons (which can muddy the signal). In one patient with an epiretinal implant, longer-duration stimuli allowed visualization of distinct focal spots of light. Retinal prosthetic implants are the only approved treatment for retinitis pigmentosa, a disease of the eye that causes blindness through gradual degeneration of photoreceptors. An array of microelectrodes triggered by input from a camera stimulates surviving retinal neurons, with each electrode acting as a pixel. Unintended stimulation of retinal ganglion cell axons causes patients to see large oblong shapes of light, rather than focal spots, making it difficult to perceive forms. To address this problem, we performed calcium imaging in isolated retinas and mapped the patterns of cells activated by different electrical stimulation protocols. We found that pulse durations two orders of magnitude longer than those typically used in existing implants stimulated inner retinal neurons while avoiding activation of ganglion cell axons, thus confining retinal responses to the site of the electrode. Multielectrode stimulation with 25-ms pulses can pattern letters on the retina corresponding to a Snellen acuity of 20/312. We validated our findings in a patient with an implanted epiretinal prosthesis by demonstrating that 25-ms pulses evoke focal spots of light.

[1]  N Drasdo,et al.  Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. , 1974, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: II-Estimation of Maximum Surface Redox (Theoretical Non-Gassing) Limits , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Comparison of Electrical Stimulation Thresholds in Normal and Retinal Degenerated Mouse Retina , 2004, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  A. Ramé [Age-related macular degeneration]. , 2006, Revue de l'infirmiere.

[6]  W. Grill,et al.  Sites of neuronal excitation by epiretinal electrical stimulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Eyal Margalit,et al.  Inner retinal mechanisms engaged by retinal electrical stimulation. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Troyk,et al.  The influence of electrolyte composition on the in vitro charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) stimulation electrodes , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells Survive and Maintain Normal Dendritic Morphology in a Mouse Model of Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  High-Resolution Electrical Stimulation of Primate Retina for Epiretinal Implant Design , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Thomas Euler,et al.  Functional Stability of Retinal Ganglion Cells after Degeneration-Induced Changes in Synaptic Input , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Arup Roy,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  S. Fried,et al.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Jensen,et al.  Spatiotemporal aspects of pulsed electrical stimuli on the responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. , 2009, Experimental eye research.

[16]  S. Cogan,et al.  Sputtered iridium oxide films for neural stimulation electrodes. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[17]  David Tsai,et al.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  James Weiland,et al.  Morphological alterations in retinal neurons in the S334ter-line3 transgenic rat , 2010, Cell and Tissue Research.

[19]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  Loss of responses to visual but not electrical stimulation in ganglion cells of rats with severe photoreceptor degeneration. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Jensen,et al.  Activation of ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mouse retinas with monophasic and biphasic current pulses , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Robert J Greenberg,et al.  Spatiotemporal interactions in retinal prosthesis subjects. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Encoding visual information in retinal ganglion cells with prosthetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Daniel K Freeman,et al.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  J. D. Weiland,et al.  Resolution of the Epiretinal Prosthesis is not Limited by Electrode Size , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  Daniel K Freeman,et al.  Calcium channel dynamics limit synaptic release in response to prosthetic stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Both electrical stimulation thresholds and SMI-32-immunoreactive retinal ganglion cell density correlate with age in S334ter line 3 rat retina. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Robert J Greenberg,et al.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  A. Sher,et al.  Photovoltaic Retinal Prosthesis with High Pixel Density , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[31]  Roland Thewes,et al.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Matthew R. Behrend,et al.  The Argus™ II retinal prosthesis: Factors affecting patient selection for implantation , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[34]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Fighting Blindness with Microelectronics , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[35]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity , 2013, Nature.

[36]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Imaging the response of the retina to electrical stimulation with genetically encoded calcium indicators. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[38]  Donald K Eddington,et al.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  K. Mathieson,et al.  Cortical responses elicited by photovoltaic subretinal prostheses exhibit similarities to visually evoked potentials , 2013, Nature Communications.

[40]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  Focal Electrical Stimulation of Major Ganglion Cell Types in the Primate Retina for the Design of Visual Prostheses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  M. McCall,et al.  Local signaling from a retinal prosthetic in a rodent retinitis pigmentosa model in vivo , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[44]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[45]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  High-Fidelity Reproduction of Spatiotemporal Visual Signals for Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, Neuron.

[46]  D. Palanker,et al.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  A. Sher,et al.  Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[48]  Shelley Fried,et al.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.