Predictive criteria for MRI-based evaluation of response both during and after radiotherapy for cervical cancer

Purpose For cervical carcinoma, the presence of persistent disease after radiotherapy (RT) is a significant predictor for survival. To date, no standard protocol is available to evaluate a response. This study was performed to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate presence of local residual disease during and after RT for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ib1-IVa cervical cancer. Material and methods Forty-two patients were included. Patients underwent MRI before external beam RT, at final intracavitary brachytherapy (BCT) and 2-3 months after completion of RT. Two blinded radiologists (observer 1: experienced, observer 2: less experienced) scored the likelihood of residual tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated by means of (a) ‘subjective’ visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images, and (b) ‘objective’ visual evaluation of T2 weighted MRI images according to predefined imaging criteria. Results Seven patients had residual disease. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for ‘subjective’ visual assessment was 0.79/0.75 (observer 1/observer 2) after RT and 0.75/0.43 at final BCT. The combined ‘objective’ MRI criteria (isointense, nodular, and irregular) resulted in improved prediction of residual tumor (AUCs of 0.91/0.85 after RT). For the less experienced observer, the MRI criteria set significantly improved prediction of residual tumor compared to ‘subjective’ visual assessment. Observer dependency decreased, kappa of 0.41 compared to 0.84 for the MRI criteria set after RT. Conclusion Compared to ‘subjective’ visual assessment, predefined ‘objective’ MRI criteria increase diagnostic performance and decrease observer dependency for assessing residual tumor after RT in cervical cancer.

[1]  William Y. Song,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: initiating a program , 2015, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.

[2]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Sequential magnetic resonance imaging of cervical cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[5]  E. Trimble,et al.  The Development of Priority Cervical Cancer Trials: A Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Report , 2010, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[6]  P. Lambin,et al.  Combined use of hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced cervix carcinoma. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  T. Oliver,et al.  Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  G. Beets,et al.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part I. Are we able to predict tumor confined to the rectal wall? , 2009, Radiology.

[9]  C. Haie-meder,et al.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting residual disease in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma with chemoradiation therapy , 2008, Cancer.

[10]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Mesorectal fascia invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: accuracy of MR imaging for prediction. , 2008, Radiology.

[11]  V. Valentini,et al.  Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in follow-up of cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy: evaluation of cost-effectiveness. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  P. Viens,et al.  Contribution of surgery in patients with bulky residual disease after chemoradiation for advanced cervical carcinoma. , 2007, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  H. Hollema,et al.  Gynecologic examination and cervical biopsies after (chemo) radiation for cervical cancer to identify patients eligible for salvage surgery. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  R. Reznek,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of recurrent cervical carcinoma , 2006, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[16]  Chun-Chieh Wang,et al.  Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Heoung Keun Kang,et al.  Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  M. Rotman,et al.  Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  Y Narita,et al.  Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R. Manfredi,et al.  Cervical cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy: MR imaging assessment. , 1998, Radiology.

[21]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[22]  H. Hricak,et al.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. , 1988, Radiology.

[23]  D. Alberts,et al.  Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.