Impact of Herbicide Treatments on the Construction Materials in the Roman Wall of Lugo, Spain (UNESCO World Heritage Site)

Combined laboratory and field research examining the possible alterations caused by herbicide treatments applied to the construction materials (schist and some granite, bound with mortar) in the Roman wall of Lugo (NW Spain), declared a World Heritage site by UNESCO in 2000, was performed in three separate studies in the past 20 years. In the summers of 1998 and 1999, the herbicides glyphosate, sulphosate and glufosinate–ammonium, as well as physical treatments (infrared and burning) were separately applied to different areas of the wall. In the spring of 2016, the oxyfluorfen herbicide Goal Supreme® was applied to test areas. In the winter of 2018, three essential oils, Origanum vulgare L., Thymus zygis Loefl. ex L., and Thymus vulgaris L., were each applied to test areas. Mineralogical modifications in the materials (determined by X-ray diffraction analysis), as well as visible physical changes, such as colour changes, and the appearance of saline residues were evaluated after the treatments. In the 1998/9 trial, glyphosate and both physical treatments triggered changes in the vermiculite clay minerals in the schists, and the physical treatments also caused changes in the kaolinite. None of the treatments caused highly perceptible colour changes. The oxyfluorfen herbicide did not cause any mineralogical alterations in the construction materials, but it did generate an increase in chloride, nitrate and sulphate contents of the granite and a slight darkening of this material. In the most recent study, the only deleterious effect observed was a perceptible increase in lightness and reduction in the yellow component after the application of Thymus zygis Loefl. ex L. essential oil to granite.

[1]  G. Bonanomi,et al.  Biodeteriogens at a southern Italian heritage site: Analysis and management of vascular flora on the walls of Villa Rufolo , 2021 .

[2]  H. Viles,et al.  Revisiting and reanalysing the concept of bioreceptivity 25 years on. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  C. Gaylarde Influence of Environment on Microbial Colonization of Historic Stone Buildings with Emphasis on Cyanobacteria , 2020, Heritage.

[4]  G. Caneva,et al.  Colonization and damages of Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle on archaeological structures: Evidence from the Aurelian Walls in Rome (Italy) , 2020 .

[5]  Sergio Enrico Favero-Longo,et al.  A review of the nature, role and control of lithobionts on stone cultural heritage: weighing-up and managing biodeterioration and bioprotection , 2020, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[6]  J. Fontaine,et al.  Essential Oils as Potential Alternative Biocontrol Products against Plant Pathogens and Weeds: A Review , 2020, Foods.

[7]  G. Bonanomi,et al.  Deteriogenic flora of the Phlegraean Fields Archaeological Park: ecological analysis and management guidelines , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  Giulia Caneva,et al.  Natural biocides for the conservation of stone cultural heritage: A review , 2019, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[9]  G. Bonanomi,et al.  Vascular plant colonisation of four castles in southern Italy: Effects of substrate bioreceptivity, local environment factors and current management , 2018, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation.

[10]  R. Schiestl,et al.  Glyphosate-based herbicides and cancer risk: a post-IARC decision review of potential mechanisms, policy and avenues of research , 2018, Carcinogenesis.

[11]  N. Ntoulas,et al.  Flame Weeding at Archaeological Sites of the Mediterranean Region , 2017, Weed Technology.

[12]  Daniela Pinna,et al.  Coping with Biological Growth on Stone Heritage Objects: Methods, Products, Applications, and Perspectives , 2017 .

[13]  Giorgio Faraci,et al.  Ensuring the Conservative Process: The Roman Walls of Lugo Maintenance Plan , 2016 .

[14]  G. Caneva,et al.  Natural habitats of typical plants growing on ruins of Roman archaeological sites (Rome, Italy) , 2016 .

[15]  Francisco M. Martínez-Verdú,et al.  Conversion of a digital camera into a non-contact colorimeter for use in stone cultural heritage: the application case to Spanish granites , 2014 .

[16]  B. Prieto,et al.  Recovery of the traditional colours of painted woodwork in the Historical Centre of Lugo (NW Spain) , 2011 .

[17]  Robert A. Francis,et al.  Wall ecology: A frontier for urban biodiversity and ecological engineering , 2011 .

[18]  F. Martínez-Verdú,et al.  Measuring the color of granite rocks: A proposed procedure , 2010 .

[19]  Mary-Lou E. Florian,et al.  Plant Biology for Cultural Heritage: Biodeterioration and Conservation , 2009 .

[20]  Simona Ceschin,et al.  Mapping the risk of damage from tree roots for the conservation of archaeological sites: the case of the Domus Aurea, Rome , 2006 .

[21]  Hans G. Völz,et al.  Industrial Color Testing , 2001 .

[22]  R. Berns Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology , 2000 .

[23]  K. K. Jain,et al.  Role of higher plants in the deterioration of historic buildings , 1995 .

[24]  N. Hartwig Introduction to Weeds and Herbicides , 1988 .

[25]  Lucía Torres García Flora vascular de la Muralla de Lugo. Control del crecimiento y germinación de la dominante Parietaria judaica L. , 2019 .

[26]  Giulia Caneva,et al.  Tree roots and damages in the Jewish catacombs of Villa Torlonia (Roma) , 2009 .

[27]  O. Salvadori,et al.  Efficacy of a biocide tested on selected lichens and its effects on their substrata , 2007 .

[28]  C. C. Dewey An Investigation into the Effects of an Herbicide on Historic Masonry Materials , 1999 .

[29]  M. T. Almeida,et al.  Neutralisation of herbicides. Effects on wall vegetation , 1997 .

[30]  J. Ashurst,et al.  Weathering and decay of masonry. , 1990 .

[31]  James E Fearn,et al.  The effects of herbicides on masonry , 1978 .