Spatial attention: normal processes and their breakdown.

Although "attention" is a general term in everyday folk and psychologic use, using research from cognitive psychology allows a focus on the processes associated with attention. A process-oriented definition of attention [2] makes "attention" a concept that can be studied rigorously. Attention is necessary for eliminating unwanted sensory inputs or irrelevant behavioral tasks and is useful when some cognitive system or process receives too many inputs. Attention acts to restrict the number of inputs and allow processing to continue in an effective manner. Although there are many forms of attentional selection, spatial attention is the most studied and perhaps the best understood form of selection. Spatial attention is the variety of attention most widely studied in neuropsychologic populations. As was evident from the authors' review, different neuropsychologic syndromes can be characterized as involving different difficulties with the component processes of spatial attention. Different neural structures work in concert to produce normal spatial selection, and damage to any of these neural structures, including the parietal and frontal lobes, pulvinar, and superior colliculus, produce an attentional impairment. Attentional impairments often have been studied in cases of focal brain damage resulting from stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumor, and surgical resection. Focal or multifocal lesions caused by neurodegenerative impairments, such as PSP and AD, however, also have marked effects on neural processes of attention. Patients with AD exhibit a range of impairments in spatial attention, and these impairments have been studied relatively little. Despite the understanding of attention provided by various patient populations, gaps remain in knowledge of the mechanisms involved in attending to space. For example, most studies of neurologic patients have used a simple spatial cuing paradigm with highly predictive cues. Although this task yields robust results and can be adapted for use with many different patient groups, the spatial cuing effects produced by such tasks have multiple interpretations (e.g., allocation of resources versus reduction of decision noise). This review highlights the general point that different neural sites seem to be responsible for different forms of attentional control, such as object-based attention, attentional task switching, and the executive control of attention [8.33]. Understanding the integration of these neural sites and their relationship to cognitive processes and, ultimately, behavior, will increase understanding of normal and disordered attentional selection.

[1]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Controlling the focus of spatial attention during visual search: effects of advanced aging and Alzheimer disease. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[2]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. de Bleser,et al.  Visual agnosia: a case of reduced attentional "spotlight"? , 1995, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[4]  J. Hodges,et al.  Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer's disease. A critical review. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect I: clinical and anatomic issues , 2000 .

[7]  M. Petrides,et al.  Directed attention after unilateral frontal excisions in humans , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The Directional Coding of Reaching Movements. A Visuomotor Conception of Spatial Neglect , 1987 .

[9]  J. Wade,et al.  The clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[10]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Petersen,et al.  Contributions of the pulvinar to visual spatial attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attention and brain function in Alzheimer's disease: A review. , 1993 .

[14]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[15]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[18]  R. Rafal,et al.  Visual Extinction and Stimulus Repetition , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[20]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Patient-based approaches to cognitive neuroscience , 2000 .

[21]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention: The Relation of Macrostructure to Microstructure in Parietal Neglect , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Allport Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years , 1993 .

[23]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[24]  M. Eckstein The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .

[25]  Robert D. Nebes The cognitive neuropsychology of Alzheimer's disease. , 2000 .

[26]  E. Tangalos,et al.  CME Practice parameter: , 2022 .

[27]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[28]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[30]  Jamshed J. Bharucha,et al.  STEVENS’ HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2002 .

[31]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[32]  R. Nebes,et al.  Focused and Divided Attention in Alzheimer's Disease , 1989, Cortex.

[33]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[35]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  The neurology of visual attention. , 1995 .

[36]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Principles and Practice of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology , 2003 .

[37]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly , 1994 .

[38]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Alzheimer disease constricts the dynamic range of spatial attention in visual search , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  R. Rafal,et al.  Progressive supranuclear palsy , 1981, Neurology.

[40]  R. Douglas,et al.  Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  H. Coslett,et al.  Narrowing the spotlight: A visual attentional disorder in presumed alzheimer's disease , 1995 .

[42]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[44]  J. Semmes,et al.  Visual Agnosia: A Case of Reduced Attentional “Spotlight”? , 1992, Cortex.

[45]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation , 1985, Neurology.

[46]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[47]  H. Karnath,et al.  Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  M. Posner,et al.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[51]  K Ball,et al.  Visual attention impairments in Alzheimer’s disease , 2000, Neurology.

[52]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[53]  S. Petersen,et al.  Pulvinar nuclei of the behaving rhesus monkey: visual responses and their modulation. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  M. Farah,et al.  Unconscious perception of “extinguished” visual stimuli: Reassessing the evidence , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[56]  M. Posner,et al.  Does attention affect visual feature integration? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[58]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[60]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Human Brain , 2002 .

[61]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  G. Woodman,et al.  Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory , 2002 .

[63]  D. Stuss,et al.  Visual attention deficits in Alzheimer's disease: simple versus conjoined feature search. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[64]  R. Rafal,et al.  Attention and Feature Integration: Illusory Conjunctions in a Patient with a Parietal Lobe Lesion , 1991 .

[65]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[66]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[67]  [Neuropsychology of mental imagery]. , 1982, L'annee psychologique.

[68]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  M. Posner,et al.  Deficits in human visual spatial attention following thalamic lesions. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  Matthew Rizzo,et al.  Visual search in hemineglect : what stirs idle eyes? , 1992 .

[71]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Position of the Egocentric Reference and Directional Arm Movements in Right-Brain-Damaged Patients , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[72]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[73]  H. Karnath,et al.  Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[74]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[75]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[76]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[77]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[78]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[79]  J. Jonides,et al.  Spatial working memory and spatial selective attention. , 1998 .

[80]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[81]  Alessandro Farnè,et al.  In search of biased egocentric reference frames in neglect , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[82]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Genetics and visual attention: Selective deficits in healthy adult carriers of the ɛ4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene , 2000 .

[83]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention , 2000 .

[84]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[85]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[86]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[87]  K M Heilman,et al.  Performance On hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome , 1983, Neurology.

[88]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[89]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[90]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[91]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[92]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[93]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[94]  D. Levine,et al.  Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered , 1987, Neurology.

[95]  S. Ferber,et al.  Parietal and occipital lobe contributions to perception of straight ahead orientation , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[96]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[97]  M. Farah,et al.  Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[98]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[99]  J V Haxby,et al.  Visuospatial attention in dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[100]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention , 1984 .

[101]  H. Pashler,et al.  Negligible Effect of Spatial Precuing on Identification of Single Digits , 1994 .

[102]  K M Heilman,et al.  Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects , 1990, Neurology.

[103]  A. Burns Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1991 .

[104]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[105]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[106]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[107]  R. Parasuraman The attentive brain , 1998 .

[108]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[109]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Endogenously Generated and Visually Guided Saccades after Lesions of the Human Frontal Eye Fields , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[110]  D. Balota,et al.  Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[111]  S. Vecera,et al.  Psychoanatomical substrates of Bálint's syndrome , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[112]  Christof Zoelch,et al.  Disorders of visuospatial orientation in the frontal plane in patients with visual neglect following right or left parietal lesions , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[113]  Attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1996 .

[114]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[115]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[116]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  In search for the egocentric reference. A neurophysiological hypothesis , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[117]  B. Milner,et al.  Effects of frontal or temporal lobectomy on the use of advance information in a choice reaction time task , 1989, Neuropsychologia.