Message Convergence as a Message-centered Approach to Analyzing and Improving Risk Communication

This study introduces the message convergence framework, initially established by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, as means for comprehending and analyzing the process through which audiences simultaneously decipher pluralistic meaning from multiple sources typical of crisis events. Emphasizing Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's concept of plurality, the framework establishes three propositions: focusing on source credibility, significance of source convergence, and the evolution of source convergence throughout the crisis. The propositions are applied to the transcripts generated by focus groups that observed a series of simulated television reports about a mock crisis. Participants performed well in distinguishing among sources and their credibility, in recognizing and evaluating points of convergence, and in seeing how these points of convergence gain and lose strength or persuasiveness as the crisis unfolds. The framework is seen as a practical tool for assessing an organization's credibility and relationships prior to a crisis and for monitoring coverage of crises in both traditional and social media.

[1]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Crisis Communication and the Underserved: The Case for Partnering with Institutions of Faith , 2011 .

[2]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Communication and Organizational Crisis , 2003 .

[3]  Mildred A. Horodynski,et al.  Increasing nutrition literacy: testing the effectiveness of print, web site, and game modalities. , 2008, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[4]  Kathryn E. Anthony,et al.  Information Acquisition, Perception, Preference, and Convergence by Gulf Coast Residents in the Aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina Crisis , 2011 .

[5]  P. Slovic Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Joel O. Iverson,et al.  Communicating Knowing Through Communities of Practice: Exploring Internal Communicative Processes and Differences Among CoPs , 2008 .

[7]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Accounts, excuses, and apologies : a theory of image restoration strategies , 1994 .

[8]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding , 1999 .

[9]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social dynamics of environmental risk perception: implications for risk communication research and practice , 2003 .

[10]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel Process , 2006 .

[11]  David A. Frank 1958 and the Rhetorical Turn in 20th-Century Thought , 2011 .

[12]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[13]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications , 1979 .

[14]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[15]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Lachlan,et al.  Telepresence and Exemplification: Does Spatial Presence Impact Sleeper Effects? , 2012 .

[17]  David A. Frank Argumentation Studies in the Wake of the New Rhetoric , 2004 .

[18]  Ch. Perelman The New Rhetoric and the Humanities , 1979 .

[19]  Timothy L. Sellnow,et al.  Effective Risk Communication: A Message-Centered Approach , 2008 .

[20]  Phillip K. Tompkins,et al.  Apollo, Challenger, Columbia: The Decline of the Space Program: A Study in Organizational Communication , 2004 .

[21]  Ray D. Dearin The philosophical basis of Chaim Perelman's theory of rhetoric , 1969 .

[22]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II , 2009 .

[23]  S. Venette Risk as an Inherent Element in the Study of Crisis Communication , 2008 .

[24]  C. Tindale Ways of Being Reasonable: Perelman and the Philosophers , 2010 .

[25]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[26]  J. Arvai,et al.  Effective Risk Communication , 2014 .