Random dynamic load identification for stochastic structural-acoustic system using an adaptive regularization parameter and evidence theory

Abstract In practical engineering, the non-contact measurement is more excellent due to preventing the potential damage of contact transducers. In this paper, a sound pressure-based method is proposed for identifying the random dynamic load acting on structural-acoustic coupled (SAC) system. Considering the characteristic of pseudo excitation and the influence rule of the regularization parameter, an adaptive regularization parameter is formulated to deal with the ill-posedness and reduce the error amplification of random excitation identification. Compared with the Tikhonov regularization method and Moore-Penrose pseudo inverse (MPI) method, the proposed improved regularization method reduces the identified error by 2.24 × 103 N2/Hz and 2.91 × 105 N2/Hz at 4 Hz and 6 Hz respectively in the studied example. The identified loads by improved regularization method match the actual loads adequately in the full frequency. Furthermore, owing to the uncertainty of the SAC system, the method for solving the stochastic system problem is investigated by the evidence theory combined with the interval analysis. Accordingly, the lower and upper bounds are derived to assess the statistical property of identified random dynamic loads. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed methods is demonstrated by several numerical examples of complex stochastic systems.

[1]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  A stochastic finite element dynamic analysis of structures with uncertain parameters , 1998 .

[2]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[3]  C. Jiang,et al.  Correlation analysis of non-probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique , 2011 .

[4]  David Thompson,et al.  The Quantification of Structure-Borne Transmission Paths by Inverse Methods - Part 2: Use of Regularization Techniques , 2003 .

[5]  Z. Mourelatos,et al.  A Design Optimization Method Using Evidence Theory , 2006, DAC 2005.

[6]  C. Jiang,et al.  A novel computational inverse technique for load identification using the shape function method of moving least square fitting , 2014 .

[7]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Gradient projection for reliability-based design optimization using evidence theory , 2008 .

[8]  Mathieu Aucejo,et al.  A multiplicative regularization for force reconstruction , 2017 .

[9]  David Thompson,et al.  The quantification of structure-borne transmission paths by inverse methods. Part 1: Improved singular value rejection methods , 2003 .

[10]  Dejie Yu,et al.  Dynamic load identification for stochastic structures based on Gegenbauer polynomial approximation and regularization method , 2015 .

[11]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[12]  Xu Han,et al.  Evidence-theory-based structural static and dynamic response analysis under epistemic uncertainties , 2013 .

[13]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  REGULARIZATION TOOLS: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems , 1994, Numerical Algorithms.

[14]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  The action of flexible bridges under wind, II: Buffeting theory , 1978 .

[15]  C. Jiang,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model , 2013 .

[16]  C.-M. Lee,et al.  A modified transfer matrix method for prediction of transmission loss of multilayer acoustic materials , 2009 .

[17]  C. Jiang,et al.  A new improved regularization method for dynamic load identification , 2014 .

[18]  F. D. Bartlett,et al.  Model Verification of Force Determination for Measuring Vibratory Loads , 1979 .

[19]  Vikas Arora,et al.  Acoustic-based damage detection method , 2014 .

[20]  M. Aucejo,et al.  A space-frequency multiplicative regularization for force reconstruction problems , 2018 .

[21]  Weikang Jiang,et al.  Near field acoustic holography (NAH) theory for cyclostationary sound field and its application , 2006 .

[22]  Xu Han,et al.  An inverse procedure for identification of loads on composite laminates , 2002 .

[23]  S. Karlsson,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF EXTERNAL STRUCTURAL LOADS FROM MEASURED HARMONIC RESPONSES , 1996 .

[24]  S. S. Law,et al.  Identification of system parameters and input force from output only , 2007 .

[25]  Xu Han,et al.  An efficient method to reduce ill-posedness for structural dynamic load identification , 2017 .

[26]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  Structural responses to arbitrarily coherent stationary random excitations , 1994 .

[27]  Zhichun Yang,et al.  Experimental study of random dynamic loads identification based on weighted regularization method , 2015 .

[29]  G. Schuëller.  A state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanics , 1997 .

[30]  David Thompson,et al.  Selection of response measurement locations to improve inverse force determination , 2006 .

[31]  J. D. Maynard,et al.  Nearfield acoustic holography: I. Theory of generalized holography and the development of NAH , 1985 .

[32]  Xu Han,et al.  A novel evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for structures with epistemic uncertainty , 2013 .

[33]  Animesh Chatterjee,et al.  Sensitivity and Error Analysis of a Coupled Micro-Resonator Array for Ultra-Sensitive Mass Detection Using Matrix Perturbation Theory , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[34]  Xu Guo,et al.  Computer simulation of structural random loading identification , 2001 .

[35]  Xue Han,et al.  Comparative study of metamodeling techniques for reliability analysis using evidence theory , 2012, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[36]  Sean F. Wu,et al.  Reconstruction of vibro-acoustic fields using hybrid nearfield acoustic holography , 2005 .

[37]  Y. E. Lage,et al.  Force identification using the concept of displacement transmissibility , 2013 .

[38]  Jérôme Antoni,et al.  Bayesian force reconstruction with an uncertain model , 2012 .

[39]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions , 1970, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[40]  Zhichun Yang,et al.  Random dynamic load identification based on error analysis and weighted total least squares method , 2015 .

[41]  Christian Cremona,et al.  Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques , 2006 .

[42]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Probabilistic finite elements for nonlinear structural dynamics , 1986 .

[43]  Hui Yin,et al.  Interval and random analysis for structure–acoustic systems with large uncertain-but-bounded parameters , 2016 .

[44]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[45]  Xinqun Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of dynamic vehicle axle loads on bridges of different surface conditions , 2007 .

[46]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[47]  Yi Liu,et al.  Dynamic force identification based on enhanced least squares and total least-squares schemes in the frequency domain , 2005 .

[48]  Li Hong-geng.  Sound source identification and contribution analysis based on acoustic array technology , 2010 .

[49]  Sun Xingshen.  Identification Method of Dynamic Loads for Stochastic Structures Based on Matrix Perturbation Theory , 2014 .