Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopy

A photoacoustic microscope system provides label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of unprocessed human breast specimens. The goal of breast-conserving surgery is to completely remove all of the cancer. Currently, no intraoperative tools can microscopically analyze the entire lumpectomy specimen, which results in 20 to 60% of patients undergoing second surgeries to achieve clear margins. To address this critical need, we have laid the foundation for the development of a device that could allow accurate intraoperative margin assessment. We demonstrate that by taking advantage of the intrinsic optical contrast of breast tissue, photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) can achieve multilayered histology-like imaging of the tissue surface. The high correlation of the PAM images to the conventional histologic images allows rapid computations of diagnostic features such as nuclear size and packing density, potentially identifying small clusters of cancer cells. Because PAM does not require tissue processing or staining, it can be performed promptly and intraoperatively, enabling immediate directed re-excision and reducing the number of second surgeries.

[1]  Mark C Kelley,et al.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Gross Examination of Surgical Margin Status in Women Undergoing Partial Mastectomy for Breast Malignancy , 2005, The American surgeon.

[2]  Qifa Zhou,et al.  In vivo label-free photoacoustic microscopy of cell nuclei by excitation of DNA and RNA. , 2010, Optics letters.

[3]  R. Collins,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Pleijhuis,et al.  Obtaining Adequate Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Modalities and Future Directions , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  Yrjö Collan,et al.  Correlation of nuclear morphometry of breast cancer in histological sections with clinicopathological features and prognosis. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[6]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Annals of Surgical Oncology 15(5):1271–1272 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9766-0 Positive Margins: The Challenge Continues for Breast Surgeons , 2008 .

[7]  M. Trivella,et al.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Andrew Hanby,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[9]  Eunyoung Kang,et al.  Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2012, Journal of breast cancer.

[10]  Kent Griffith,et al.  Determinants of Breast Conservation Rates: Reasons for Mastectomy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center , 2009, The breast journal.

[11]  Judith Sandbank,et al.  A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[12]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[13]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Meng-Lin Li,et al.  Deep-penetration photoacoustic array imaging of calcifications , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Grueneisen relaxation photoacoustic microscopy. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[16]  Daniele Zink,et al.  Nuclear structure in cancer cells , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  S. Singletary.  Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[18]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  N. Shepherd,et al.  New relationships between breast microcalcifications and cancer , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  S. van Esser,et al.  Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[21]  Yan Peng,et al.  Impact of Routine Cavity Shave Margins on Breast Cancer Re-excision Rates , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Qifa Zhou,et al.  Optimal ultraviolet wavelength for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of cell nuclei. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  Robert Shenk,et al.  Breast Conservation Surgery Achieving ≥ 2 mm Tumor‐Free Margins Results in Decreased Local‐Regional Recurrence Rates , 2006, The breast journal.

[25]  Seema A Khan,et al.  Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stages I and II Invasive Breast Cancer , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Da-Kang Yao,et al.  Label-free photoacoustic microscopy of cytochromes , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  Ce Zhang,et al.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features , 2016, Nature Communications.

[28]  Moshe Zilberman,et al.  A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. , 2008, American journal of surgery.

[29]  Sheldon M. Feldman,et al.  Intra-operative Touch Preparation Cytology; Does It Have a Role in Re-excision Lumpectomy? , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  Lihong V. Wang.  Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. , 2009, Nature photonics.

[31]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action , 2015, Nature Methods.

[32]  Julliette M. Buckley,et al.  Lumpectomy Cavity Shaved Margins Do Not Impact Re-excision Rates in Breast Cancer Patients , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  M. Osborne,et al.  The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[34]  H. Feigelson,et al.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[35]  S. Meijer,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[36]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Mohammadreza Nasiriavanaki,et al.  Wide-field two-dimensional multifocal optical-resolution photoacoustic-computed microscopy. , 2013, Optics letters.

[38]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  Paul C Beard,et al.  Spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of lipid-rich plaques in the human aorta in the 740 to 1400 nm wavelength range. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.