Efficient Charging Coordination for Electric Vehicles Under Auction Games

A novel class of auction games is formulated to study coordination problems arising from charging a population of electric vehicles (EVs) over a finite horizon. Different from those analyzed in the above chapters, the charging power of EVs at different time slots could be regarded as multi-type resources, and there exist coupling constraints among these resources, say the total charging power over the whole horizon should not exceed the battery size of EVs in this scenario. To compete for energy allocation over the horizon, each individual EV submits a multidimensional bid, with the dimension equal to two times the number of time-steps in the horizon. The use of the progressive second price (PSP) auction mechanism ensures that incentive compatibility holds for the auction games. Due to the cross elasticity of EVs over the charging horizon, the marginal valuation of an individual EV at a particular time is determined by both the demand at that time and the total demand over the entire horizon. This difficulty is addressed by partitioning the allowable set of bid profiles based on the total desired energy over the entire horizon. It is shown that the efficient bid profile over the charging horizon is a Nash equilibrium of the underlying auction game. An update mechanism for the auction game is designed. A numerical example demonstrates that the auction process converges to an efficient Nash equilibrium. The auction-based charging coordination scheme is adapted to a receding horizon formulation to account for disturbances and forecast uncertainty.

[1]  Peter E. Caines,et al.  Analysis of Decentralized Quantized Auctions on Cooperative Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  P Frías,et al.  Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Francesca Parise,et al.  Decentralized Convergence to Nash Equilibria in Constrained Deterministic Mean Field Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Comments Welcome , 1999 .

[5]  A. Lazar The Progressive Second Price Auction Mechanism for Network Resource Sharing , 2007 .

[6]  A. David,et al.  Strategic bidding for electricity supply in a day-ahead energy market , 2001 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions , 2014 .

[8]  Sekyung Han,et al.  Development of an Optimal Vehicle-to-Grid Aggregator for Frequency Regulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Hosam K. Fathy,et al.  Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charge pattern optimization for energy cost and battery longevity , 2011 .

[10]  Kaushik Rajashekara,et al.  Power Electronics and Motor Drives in Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity marketplace , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[13]  Peter E. Caines,et al.  Analysis of Quantized Double Auctions with Application to Competitive Electricity Markets , 2010, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[14]  Peter E. Caines,et al.  Analysis of a class of decentralized dynamical systems: rapid convergence and efficiency of dynamical quantized auctions , 2010, IMA J. Math. Control. Inf..

[15]  Aurel A. Lazar,et al.  Design and Analysis of the Progressive Second Price Auction for Network Bandwidth Sharing , 1999 .

[16]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Decentralized Charging of Plug-in Electric Vehicles With Distribution Feeder Overload Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging , 2013 .

[18]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[19]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Energy Delivery Transaction Pricing for flexible electrical loads , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[20]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Overview of power management in hybrid electric vehicles , 2002 .

[21]  A. David,et al.  Optimal bidding strategies and modeling of imperfect information among competitive generators , 2001 .

[22]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[23]  E. Bompard,et al.  The Demand Elasticity Impacts on the Strategic Bidding Behavior of the Electricity Producers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  M. Ilic,et al.  Optimal Charge Control of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Deregulated Electricity Markets , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Bruno Tuffin Revisited Progressive Second Price Auction for Charging Telecommunication Networks , 2002, Telecommun. Syst..

[26]  Carl Binding,et al.  Planning electric-drive vehicle charging under constrained grid conditions , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology.

[27]  Michael C. Caramanis,et al.  Uniform and complex bids for demand response and wind generation scheduling in multi-period linked transmission and distribution markets , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[28]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Cycle-life model for graphite-LiFePO 4 cells , 2011 .

[29]  Zoran S. Filipi,et al.  Stochastic Modeling for Studies of Real-World PHEV Usage: Driving Schedule and Daily Temporal Distributions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[30]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  Hosam K. Fathy,et al.  Optimization of dynamic battery paramter characterization experiments via differential evolution , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[32]  W. Short,et al.  Evaluation of Utility System Impacts and Benefits of Optimally Dispatched Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (Revised) , 2006 .

[33]  G. Andersson,et al.  Demand Management of Grid Connected Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) , 2008, 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference.

[34]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[35]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Computational-Mechanism Design: A Call to Arms , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[36]  Dionysios Aliprantis,et al.  Load Scheduling and Dispatch for Aggregators of Plug-In Electric Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[37]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  An efficient Nash-implementation mechanism for network resource allocation , 2010, Autom..

[38]  Aleksandr Rudkevich,et al.  Power market reform in the presence of flexible schedulable distributed loads. New bid rules, equilibrium and tractability issues , 2012, 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[39]  L. Hurwicz Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points , 1979 .

[40]  N. M. Fehr,et al.  Modeling Electricity Auctions , 2002 .

[41]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Efficiency-risk tradeoffs in dynamic oligopoly markets - with application to electricity markets , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[42]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[43]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Factoring the elasticity of demand in electricity prices , 2000 .

[44]  M.M. Collins,et al.  The timing of EV recharging and its effect on utilities , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[45]  J. Van Mierlo,et al.  Electric and electric hybrid vehicle technology: a survey , 2000 .

[46]  Jason Taylor,et al.  Integrating plug-in- electric vehicles with the distribution system , 2009 .