Redundancy effect in multimedia learning: A closer look

The generally accepted assumption by most multimedia researchers is that learning is inhibited when on-screen text and narration containing the same information is presented simultaneously, rather than on-screen text or narration alone. This is known as the verbal redundancy effect. Are there situations where the reverse is true? This research was designed to investigate the reverse redundancy effect for non-native English speakers learning English reading comprehension, where two instructional modes were used the redundant mode and the modality mode. In the redundant mode, static pictures and audio narration were presented with synchronized redundant on-screen text. In the modality mode, only static pictures and audio were presented. In both modes, learners were allowed to control the pacing of the lessons. Participants were 209 Yemeni learners in their first year of tertiary education. Examination of text comprehension scores indicated that those learners who were exposed to the redundancy mode performed significantly better than learners in the modality mode. They were also significantly more motivated than their counterparts in the modality mode. This finding has added an important modification to the redundancy effect. That is the reverse redundancy effect is true for multimedia learning of English as a foreign language for students where textual information was foreign to them. In such situations, the redundant synchronized on-screen text did not impede learning; rather it reduced the cognitive load and thereby enhanced learning.

[1]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[2]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[4]  P. Miller Learning Styles: The Multimedia of the Mind. Research Report. , 2001 .

[5]  Lifang Chen,et al.  Improvement of redundancy principle for multimedia technical foreign-language learning , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[6]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Interchange : English for International Communication , 1990 .

[7]  C. Taran,et al.  Motivation techniques in elearning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[8]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[9]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The modality effect in multimedia instructions , 2001 .

[11]  Paul Chandler,et al.  When Redundant On-Screen Text in Multimedia Technical Instruction Can Interfere With Learning , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[12]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[13]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. , 2000 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[17]  John Sweller,et al.  Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations , 2007 .

[18]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[19]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[21]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[23]  Caroline Steel,et al.  Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 , 2010 .

[24]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[25]  M. Koller,et al.  An Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction-Approach on Motivation and Student's Self-Regulated Multimedia-Based Learning , 2006 .

[26]  A. Baddeley Working Memory: The Interface between Memory and Cognition , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Toni Hoberecht,et al.  Book Review: e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed) , 2009 .