A comparative study of motor-protein motions by using a simple elastic-network model

In this work, we report on a study of the structure-function relationships for three families of motor proteins, including kinesins, myosins, and F1-ATPases, by using a version of the simple elastic-network model of large-scale protein motions originally proposed by Tirion [Tirion, M. (1996) Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1905–1908]. We find a surprising dichotomy between kinesins and the other motor proteins (myosins and F1-ATPase). For the latter, there exist one or two dominant lowest-frequency modes (one for myosin, two for F1-ATPase) obtained from normal-mode analysis of the elastic-network model, which overlap remarkably well with the measured conformational changes derived from pairs of solved crystal structures in different states. Furthermore, we find that the computed global conformational changes induced by the measured deformation of the nucleotide-binding pocket also overlap well with the measured conformational changes, which is consistent with the “nucleotide-binding-induced power-stroke” scenario. In contrast, for kinesins, this simplicity breaks down. Multiple modes are needed to generate the measured conformational changes, and the computed displacements induced by deforming the nucleotide-binding pocket also overlap poorly with the measured conformational changes, and are insufficient to explain the large-scale motion of the relay helix and the linker region. This finding may suggest the presence of two different mechanisms for myosins and kinesins, despite their strong evolutionary ties and structural similarities.

[1]  W. Wriggers,et al.  Kinesin Has Three Nucleotide-dependent Conformations , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  A. Leslie,et al.  The structure and nucleotide occupancy of bovine mitochondrial F1‐ATPase are not influenced by crystallisation at high concentrations of nucleotide , 2001, FEBS letters.

[3]  Roger Cooke,et al.  A structural change in the kinesin motor protein that drives motility , 1999, Nature.

[4]  G. Oster,et al.  Reverse engineering a protein: the mechanochemistry of ATP synthase. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  P. Kollman,et al.  Closing of the Nucleotide Pocket of Kinesin-Family Motors upon Binding to Microtubules , 2003, Science.

[6]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Roger Cooke,et al.  Two conformations in the human kinesin power stroke defined by X-ray crystallography and EPR spectroscopy , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  F J Kull,et al.  Motor proteins of the kinesin family. Structures, variations, and nucleotide binding sites. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  M. Delarue,et al.  Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Three conformational states of scallop myosin S1. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[13]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[14]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[15]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Searching for kinesin's mechanical amplifier. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  H. Cederberg,et al.  Autoregulation of yeast pyruvate decarboxylase gene expression requires the enzyme but not its catalytic activity. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[17]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[18]  F. Tama Normal mode analysis with simplified models to investigate the global dynamics of biological systems. , 2003, Protein and peptide letters.

[19]  R. Vale,et al.  The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. , 2000, Science.

[20]  Florence Tama,et al.  Mega-Dalton biomolecular motion captured from electron microscopy reconstructions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[22]  B Ermentrout,et al.  Dynamics of single-motor molecules: the thermal ratchet model. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Analysis of domain motions in large proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[24]  C. Cohen,et al.  Crystallographic findings on the internally uncoupled and near-rigor states of myosin: Further insights into the mechanics of the motor , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  K Schulten,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent movements of the kinesin motor domain predicted by simulated annealing. , 1998, Biophysical journal.