Effects of Inclination Angle, Orientation Angle, and Hole Length on Film Cooling Effectiveness of Rectangular Diffusion Holes

Film-cooling effectiveness of rectangular diffusion holes under an inclination angle α = 45 deg, an orientation angle β = 45 deg, and a length-to-diameter ratio of L/D = 8.5 were, respectively, examined in a flat-plate experimental facility using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Experiments were performed at a density ratio of DR = 1.38 and a mainstream turbulence intensity of Tu = 3.5%. The semicircle sidewall rectangular diffusion hole varied at three cross-sectional aspect ratios, i.e., AS = 3.4, 4.9, and 6.6. The tested results were compared with the baseline design with an inclination angle α = 30 deg, an orientation angle β = 0 deg, and a length-to-diameter ratio L/D = 6. A three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulation method was employed to analyze the flow field. The experimental results showed that the increased inclination angle converted the bi- or tri-peak effectiveness pattern of the baseline design to a single-peak pattern, weakened the lateral diffusion of coolant, and consequently decreased cooling effectiveness obviously. The decreased magnitude amplified with the increase of cross-sectional aspect ratio and blowing ratio. The adding of orientation angle seriously weakened the cooling effectiveness of the baseline design, and the blowing ratio and cross-sectional aspect ratio had almost no effect on overall cooling effectiveness. The elongated hole length provided a uniform distribution of lateral cooling effectiveness, which produced differential effects on the bi- or tri-peak pattern. The elongated hole length decreased the cooling effectiveness on the near hole region, but had less effects on overall cooling effectiveness, except the high blowing ratio.

[1]  Jianjun Liu,et al.  Geometrical Parameter Effects on Film-Cooling Effectiveness of Rectangular Diffusion Holes , 2017 .

[2]  Cun-liang Liu,et al.  Investigation on the Film Cooling Performance of Diffuser Shaped Holes with Different Inclination Angles , 2017 .

[3]  Jianjun Liu,et al.  Numerical Investigation on Slot-Based Diffusion Hole with Various Cross-Sectional End Shape , 2017 .

[4]  Hui Hu,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty Analysis in Determining Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness by Using Pressure Sensitive Paint Technique , 2016 .

[5]  J. Kapat,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Large Spacing Compound Angle Full-Coverage Film Cooling Arrays: Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness , 2016 .

[6]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Dependence of Film Cooling Effectiveness on 3D Printed Cooling Holes , 2016 .

[7]  B. Premachandran,et al.  Experimental assessment of film cooling performance of short cylindrical holes on a flat surface , 2016 .

[8]  Christian Saumweber,et al.  Effect of Geometry Variations on the Cooling Performance of Fan-Shaped Cooling Holes , 2012 .

[9]  H. Bauer,et al.  Film Cooling Performance of Sharp Edged Diffuser Holes With Lateral Inclination , 2012 .

[10]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Influence of Flow Structure on Compound Angled Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer , 2011 .

[11]  Dieter Bohn,et al.  Double-Jet Ejection of Cooling Air for Improved Film Cooling , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Gritsch,et al.  Effect of Hole Geometry on the Thermal Performance of Fan-Shaped Film Cooling Holes , 2005 .

[13]  Achmed Schulz,et al.  High-Resolution Measurements of Local Effectiveness From Discrete Hole Film Cooling , 2001 .

[14]  Richard J Goldstein,et al.  Film cooling downstream of a row of discrete holes with compound angle , 2000 .

[15]  B. V. Johnson,et al.  Influence of the Hole Length-to-Diameter Ratio on Film Cooling With Cylindrical Holes , 1998 .

[16]  Richard J Goldstein,et al.  Row-of-holes film cooling of curved walls at low injection angles , 1997 .

[17]  T. Simon,et al.  Measurements in Film Cooling Flows: Hole L/D and Turbulence Intensity Effects , 1996 .

[18]  D. Bogard,et al.  Adiabatic Effectiveness, Thermal Fields, and Velocity Fields for Film Cooling With Large Angle Injection , 1995 .

[19]  Je-Chin Han,et al.  Film effectiveness over a flat surface with air and CO2 injection through compound angle holes using a transient liquid crystal image method , 1995 .

[20]  Je-Chin Han,et al.  Heat Transfer Coefficients Over a Flat Surface With Air and CO2 Injection Through Compound Angle Holes Using a Transient Liquid Crystal Image Method , 1995 .

[21]  David G. Bogard,et al.  Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Adiabatic Effectiveness , 1994 .

[22]  J. H. Leylek,et al.  Discrete-Jet Film Cooling: A Comparison of Computational Results With Experiments , 1993 .

[23]  D. Bogard,et al.  Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio , 1990 .

[24]  H. Kruse,et al.  Effects of hole geometry, wall curvature and pressure gradient on film cooling downstream of a single row , 1985 .

[25]  D. Lampard,et al.  The Flow and Film Cooling Effectiveness Following Injection through a Row of Holes , 1980 .

[26]  Richard J Goldstein,et al.  Film Cooling With Large Density Differences Between the Mainstream and the Secondary Fluid Measured by the Heat-Mass Transfer Analogy , 1977 .

[27]  R. J. Goldstein,et al.  Effects of hole geometry and density on three-dimensional film cooling , 1974 .

[28]  R. J. Goldstein,et al.  Interaction of a heated jet with a deflecting stream Summary report , 1970 .

[29]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  Film cooling characteristics of a single round hole at various streamwise angles in a crossflow: Part I effectiveness , 2003 .

[30]  Ibrahim Hassan,et al.  Film Cooling Injection Hole Geometry: Hole Shape Comparison for Compound Cooling Orientation , 2001 .

[31]  James H. Leylek,et al.  A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics: Part IV -- Compound-angle injection with shaped holes , 2000 .

[32]  James H. Leylek,et al.  A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics: Part II -- Compound-angle injection with cylindrical holes , 2000 .