General Model for Treating Short-Range Electrostatic Penetration in a Molecular Mechanics Force Field

Classical molecular mechanics force fields typically model interatomic electrostatic interactions with point charges or multipole expansions, which can fail for atoms in close contact due to the lack of a description of penetration effects between their electron clouds. These short-range penetration effects can be significant and are essential for accurate modeling of intermolecular interactions. In this work we report parametrization of an empirical charge–charge function previously reported (PiquemalJ.-P.; J. Phys. Chem. A2003, 107, 1035326313624) to correct for the missing penetration term in standard molecular mechanics force fields. For this purpose, we have developed a database (S101×7) of 101 unique molecular dimers, each at 7 different intermolecular distances. Electrostatic, induction/polarization, repulsion, and dispersion energies, as well as the total interaction energy for each complex in the database are calculated using the SAPT2+ method (ParkerT. M.; J. Chem. Phys.2014, 140, 09410624606352). This empirical penetration model significantly improves agreement between point multipole and quantum mechanical electrostatic energies across the set of dimers and distances, while using only a limited set of parameters for each chemical element. Given the simplicity and effectiveness of the model, we expect the electrostatic penetration correction will become a standard component of future molecular mechanics force fields.

[1]  Darrin M York,et al.  An Efficient Linear-Scaling Ewald Method for Long-Range Electrostatic Interactions in Combined QM/MM Calculations. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[2]  Nohad Gresh,et al.  Improved Formulas for the Calculation of the Electrostatic Contribution to the Intermolecular Interaction Energy from Multipolar Expansion of the Electronic Distribution. , 2003, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[3]  Ross C. Walker,et al.  The implementation of a fast and accurate QM/MM potential method in Amber , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  C. Sherrill,et al.  Origin of the surprising enhancement of electrostatic energies by electron-donating substituents in substituted sandwich benzene dimers. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  M. Alderton,et al.  Distributed multipole analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Mark A. Spackman,et al.  The use of the promolecular charge density to approximate the penetration contribution to intermolecular electrostatic energies , 2006 .

[7]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O , 1998 .

[8]  Donald G Truhlar,et al.  Including Charge Penetration Effects in Molecular Modeling. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole Water Model for Molecular Mechanics Simulation , 2003 .

[10]  Nohad Gresh,et al.  Anisotropic, Polarizable Molecular Mechanics Studies of Inter- and Intramolecular Interactions and Ligand-Macromolecule Complexes. A Bottom-Up Strategy. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  Bernd Engels,et al.  Accurate Intermolecular Potentials with Physically Grounded Electrostatics. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  Pieter van Dokkum,et al.  The nature of , 2006 .

[13]  Jan Řezáč,et al.  Extrapolation and Scaling of the DFT-SAPT Interaction Energies toward the Basis Set Limit. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[14]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Nohad Gresh,et al.  Representation of Zn(II) complexes in polarizable molecular mechanics. Further refinements of the electrostatic and short‐range contributions. Comparisons with parallel ab initio computations , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  P. P. Ewald Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , 1921 .

[18]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[19]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[20]  Pavel Hobza,et al.  S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Daniel M. Chipman,et al.  Charge penetration in dielectric models of solvation , 1997 .

[22]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Partial Atomic Charges and Screened Charge Models of the Electrostatic Potential. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[23]  T. Windus,et al.  O + C2H4 potential energy surface: lowest-lying singlet at the multireference level , 2012, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

[24]  L. Dardenne,et al.  General methodology to optimize damping functions to account for charge penetration effects in electrostatic calculations using multicentered multipolar expansions. , 2008, Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

[25]  Matthew L. Leininger,et al.  Psi4: an open‐source ab initio electronic structure program , 2012 .

[26]  A. Stone Electrostatic damping functions and the penetration energy. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[27]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  Evaluation of Charge Penetration Between Distributed Multipolar Expansions , 2000 .

[28]  Christopher A. Hunter,et al.  The nature of .pi.-.pi. interactions , 1990 .

[29]  D. Chipman Reaction field treatment of charge penetration , 2000 .

[30]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Screened Electrostatic Interactions in Molecular Mechanics. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[31]  R. Bryce,et al.  Improved Hydrogen Bonding at the NDDO-Type Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Interface. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Robert Moszynski,et al.  Perturbation Theory Approach to Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces of van der Waals Complexes. , 1995 .

[33]  Lori A Burns,et al.  Levels of symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT). I. Efficiency and performance for interaction energies. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[34]  Pengyu Ren,et al.  Automation of AMOEBA polarizable force field parameterization for small molecules , 2012, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

[35]  G Andrés Cisneros,et al.  Application of Gaussian Electrostatic Model (GEM) Distributed Multipoles in the AMOEBA Force Field. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[36]  Edward G Hohenstein,et al.  Density fitting of intramonomer correlation effects in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  Electrostatic energy in the effective fragment potential method: Theory and application to benzene dimer , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  Anthony J. Stone,et al.  The Theory of Intermolecular Forces , 2013 .

[39]  L. K. Hardebeck,et al.  Face-to-face arene-arene binding energies: dominated by dispersion but predicted by electrostatic and dispersion/polarizability substituent constants. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  W. Smith,et al.  Point Multipoles in the Ewald Summation (revisited) , 2007 .

[41]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[42]  Jean-Philip Piquemal,et al.  Modeling Organochlorine Compounds and the σ-Hole Effect Using a Polarizable Multipole Force Field , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  T. Darden,et al.  Simple Formulas for Improved Point-Charge Electrostatics in Classical Force Fields and Hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Embedding. , 2008, International journal of quantum chemistry.

[44]  T Darden,et al.  New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations. , 1999, Structure.

[45]  Kenneth D Jordan,et al.  A second generation distributed point polarizable water model. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[46]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[47]  Giovanni Scalmani,et al.  Polarizable dielectric model of solvation with inclusion of charge penetration effects , 2001 .