Changes of DNA topology affect the global transcription landscape and allow rapid growth of a Bacillus subtilis mutant lacking carbon catabolite repression.

Bacteria are able to prioritize preferred carbon sources from complex mixtures. This is achieved by the regulatory phenomenon of carbon catabolite repression. To allow the simultaneous utilization of multiple carbon sources and to prevent the time-consuming adaptation to each individual nutrient in biotechnological applications, mutants lacking carbon catabolite repression can be used. However, such mutants often exhibit pleiotropic growth defects. We have isolated and characterized mutations that overcome the growth defect of Bacillus subtilis ccpA mutants lacking the major regulator of catabolite repression, in particular their glutamate auxotrophy. Here we show, that distinct mutations affecting the essential DNA topoisomerase I (TopA) cause glutamate prototrophy of the ccpA mutant. These suppressing variants of the TopA enzyme exhibit increased activity resulting in enhanced relaxation of the DNA. Reduced DNA supercoiling results in enhanced expression of the gltAB operon encoding the biosynthetic glutamate synthase. This is achieved by a significant re-organization of the global transcription network accompanied by re-routing of metabolism, which results in inactivation of the glutamate dehydrogenase. Our results provide a link between DNA topology, the global transcriptional network, and glutamate metabolism and suggest that specific topA mutants may be well suited for biotechnological purposes.

[1]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Toprim--a conserved catalytic domain in type IA and II topoisomerases, DnaG-type primases, OLD family nucleases and RecR proteins. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  G. Rapoport,et al.  Salt stress is an environmental signal affecting degradative enzyme synthesis in Bacillus subtilis , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  Marco Galardini,et al.  Construction and Analysis of Two Genome-Scale Deletion Libraries for Bacillus subtilis. , 2017, Cell systems.

[4]  Y. Fujita,et al.  CcpA-Mediated Catabolite Activation of the Bacillus subtilis ilv-leu Operon and Its Negation by Either CodY- or TnrA-Mediated Negative Regulation , 2014, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Jörg Stülke,et al.  Regulatory links between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. XII. DNA Topology as a Key Target of Selection , 2005, Genetics.

[7]  M. Hecker,et al.  The catabolite control protein CcpA controls ammonium assimilation in Bacillus subtilis. , 1999, Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology.

[8]  J. Stülke,et al.  Trigger enzymes: bifunctional proteins active in metabolism and in controlling gene expression , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  CcpA-Dependent Regulation of Bacillus subtilis Glutamate Dehydrogenase Gene Expression , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  E. Bremer,et al.  The γ-Aminobutyrate Permease GabP Serves as the Third Proline Transporter of Bacillus subtilis , 2013, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  Uwe Völker,et al.  Large-scale reduction of the Bacillus subtilis genome: consequences for the transcriptional network, resource allocation, and metabolism , 2017, Genome research.

[12]  M. Hecker,et al.  The dynamic protein partnership of RNA polymerase inBacillus subtilis , 2011, Proteomics.

[13]  R. Jensen,et al.  A New Class of Glutamate Dehydrogenases (GDH) , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  A. Danchin,et al.  From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: the Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later , 2009, Microbiology.

[15]  Jörg Stülke,et al.  A regulatory protein–protein interaction governs glutamate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: the glutamate dehydrogenase RocG moonlights in controlling the transcription factor GltC , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  Role and Regulation of Bacillus subtilisGlutamate Dehydrogenase Genes , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  Nicole M. Baker,et al.  Structural studies of type I topoisomerases , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  J. Lolkema,et al.  CcpA-Dependent Carbon Catabolite Repression in Bacteria , 2003, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[19]  B. Hemmings Purification and properties of the phospho and dephospho forms of yeast NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[20]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature.

[21]  K. Kimura,et al.  Glutamate dehydrogenase from Bacillus subtilis PCI 219. I. Purification and properties. , 1977, Journal of biochemistry.

[22]  U. Völker,et al.  Evidence for synergistic control of glutamate biosynthesis by glutamate dehydrogenases and glutamate in Bacillus subtilis. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[23]  A. Abdelal,et al.  The gdhB Gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosaEncodes an Arginine-Inducible NAD+-Dependent Glutamate Dehydrogenase Which Is Subject to Allosteric Regulation , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  M. Jules,et al.  Malate-Mediated Carbon Catabolite Repression in Bacillus subtilis Involves the HPrK/CcpA Pathway , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  P. Müller,et al.  Hierarchical mutational events compensate for glutamate auxotrophy of a Bacillus subtilis gltC mutant , 2017, Environmental microbiology reports.

[26]  Jörg Stülke,et al.  The regulatory link between carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: regulation of the gltAB operon by the catabolite control protein CcpA. , 2003, Microbiology.

[27]  Fabian M. Commichau,et al.  Characterization of Bacillus subtilis Mutants with Carbon Source-Independent Glutamate Biosynthesis , 2006, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  Ian R. Booth,et al.  A physiological role for DNA supercoiling in the osmotic regulation of gene expression in S. typhimurium and E. coli , 1988, Cell.

[29]  K. Ekwall,et al.  Topoisomerase I regulates open chromatin and controls gene expression in vivo , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[30]  Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana,et al.  Salt‐sensitivity of σH and Spo0A prevents sporulation of Bacillus subtilis at high osmolarity avoiding death during cellular differentiation , 2016, Molecular Microbiology.

[31]  P. Reinemer,et al.  Crystal structure of full length topoisomerase I from Thermotoga maritima. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Fabian M. Commichau,et al.  Glutamate Metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: Gene Expression and Enzyme Activities Evolved To Avoid Futile Cycles and To Allow Rapid Responses to Perturbations of the System , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  F. Pérez-Pomares,et al.  NAD-glutamate dehydrogenase from Halobacterium halobium: inhibition and activation by TCA intermediates and amino acids. , 1996, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  Condition-Dependent Transcriptome Reveals High-Level Regulatory Architecture in Bacillus subtilis , 2012, Science.

[35]  K. Gunka,et al.  Control of glutamate homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis: a complex interplay between ammonium assimilation, glutamate biosynthesis and degradation , 2012, Molecular microbiology.

[36]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS Bioinformatics Advance Access published November 12, 2005 The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling , 2022 .

[37]  Jörg Stülke,et al.  Essential genes in Bacillus subtilis: a re-evaluation after ten years. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[38]  J. Stülke,et al.  Control of the glycolytic gapA operon by the catabolite control protein A in Bacillus subtilis: a novel mechanism of CcpA‐mediated regulation , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[39]  G. W. Hatfield,et al.  DNA topology-mediated control of global gene expression in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[40]  Shane S. Sturrock,et al.  Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data , 2012, Bioinform..

[41]  T. Shlomi,et al.  Metabolite concentrations, fluxes, and free energies imply efficient enzyme usage , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[42]  B. Schmidt,et al.  All tangled up: how cells direct, manage and exploit topoisomerase function , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[43]  Jörg Stülke,et al.  Expression of the glycolytic gapA operon in Bacillus subtilis: differential syntheses of proteins encoded by the operon. , 2003, Microbiology.

[44]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[45]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  Positive regulation of glutamate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  B. Hemmings Phosphorylation of NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase from yeast. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[47]  M. Hecker,et al.  Bacillus subtilis functional genomics: global characterization of the stringent response by proteome and transcriptome analysis , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[48]  W. Hillen,et al.  Protein kinase‐dependent HPr/CcpA interaction links glycolytic activity to carbon catabolite repression in Gram‐positive bacteria , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[49]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase by reversible ADP‐ribosylation in mitochondria , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[50]  U. Mäder,et al.  Array-based approaches to bacterial transcriptome analysis , 2012 .

[51]  M. Débarbouillé,et al.  Interactions of wild-type and truncated LevR of Bacillus subtilis with the upstream activating sequence of the levanase operon. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  B. Görke,et al.  Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[53]  J. Deutscher,et al.  The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[54]  J. Tirado-Vélez,et al.  An increase in negative supercoiling in bacteria reveals topology-reacting gene clusters and a homeostatic response mediated by the DNA topoisomerase I gene , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[55]  A. Matin,et al.  Insufficient Expression of the ilv-leu Operon Encoding Enzymes of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Biosynthesis Limits Growth of a Bacillus subtilis ccpA Mutant , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.