Impact of Parcel Size, Field Shape, Crop Yield, Storage Location, and Collection Equipment on the Performance of Single-Pass Cut-and-Chip Harvest System in Commercial Shrub Willow Fields

In this study, an integrated system of harvesting, collecting, and transporting willow biomass crop to a storage site was modeled and evaluated using the IBSAL simulation model. A scenario analysis was used to quantify the impacts of five major input parameters on the performance of the integrated system. These parameters include parcel size, field shape, willow yield, distance to the storage site, and type of the collection equipment. Multiple performance indicators were identified to quantify the impacts on the system such as size of the equipment fleet, effective material and field capacity of the harvester, operating costs, and waiting times. The input data were collected from 36 commercial, short-rotation, shrub willow fields in northern New York State. The simulation results indicated that crop yield and type of collection equipment have the highest impact on operating costs and the equipment fleet size. As the size of equipment fleet increases in the system, variability in the system performance tends to increase. Field shape has the least impact on the overall system performance compared to the other four input parameters. The simulation results suggest that a combination of performance indicators need to be considered to evaluate the overall performance of the dynamic and complex system of harvesting, collection and transportation in commercial willow fields. The developed IBSAL model and scenario analysis approach can assist in planning this system based on the characteristics of field, crop, and logistical equipment to reach a high system performance.

[1]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: One-process versus two-process harvest operation , 2013 .

[2]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[3]  Erin M. Searcy,et al.  Uniform-Format Solid Feedstock Supply System: A Commodity-Scale Design to Produce an Infrastructure-Compatible Bulk Solid from Lignocellulosic Biomass -- Executive Summary , 2009 .

[4]  Timothy M. Harrigan.  TIME–MOTION ANALYSIS OF CORN SILAGE HARVEST SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[5]  Alan Christopher Hansen,et al.  Modeling And Analysis Of Row Crop Harvesting Patterns By Combines , 2005 .

[6]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Financial Analysis of the Cultivation of Short Rotation Woody Crops for Bioenergy in Belgium: Barriers and Opportunities , 2012, BioEnergy Research.

[7]  Slobodan Gutesa,et al.  Using GIS and intelligent transportation tools for biomass supply chain modeling and cost assessment , 2013 .

[8]  T. Volk,et al.  Quality and Variability of Commercial-Scale Short Rotation Willow Biomass Harvested Using a Single-Pass Cut-and-Chip Forage Harvester , 2015, BioEnergy Research.

[9]  Mahmood Ebadian,et al.  Design and scheduling of agricultural biomass supply chain for a cellulosic ethanol plant , 2013 .

[10]  Erin Webb,et al.  Cost Methodology for Biomass Feedstocks: Herbaceous Crops and Agricultural Residues , 2009 .

[11]  T. Volk,et al.  Biomass, spacing and planting design influence cut-and-chip harvesting in hybrid poplar , 2017 .

[12]  T. Volk,et al.  Advances in shrub-willow crops for bioenergy, renewable products, and environmental benefits. , 2016 .

[13]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Upsized Harvesting Technology for Coping with the New Trends in Short-Rotation Coppice , 2011 .

[14]  Yu Wang,et al.  Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis , 2017 .

[15]  Timothy A. Volk,et al.  Improving the Profitability of Willow Crops—Identifying Opportunities with a Crop Budget Model , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[16]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Development and Deployment of a Short Rotation Woody Crops Harvesting System Based on a Case New Holland Forage Harvester and SRC Woody Crop Header , 2014 .

[17]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Harvesting eucalyptus energy plantations in Brazil with a modified New Holland forage harvester. , 2016 .

[18]  Semida Silveira.  Bioenergy – realizing the potential , 2005 .

[19]  Arto Visala,et al.  Optimal control of tractor-trailer system in headlands , 2004 .

[20]  Timothy A. Volk,et al.  Evaluation of a Single-Pass, Cut and Chip Harvest System on Commercial-Scale, Short-Rotation Shrub Willow Biomass Crops , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[21]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[22]  Jian Jin,et al.  Optimal Coverage Path Planning for Arable Farming on 2D Surfaces , 2010 .

[23]  Fabio De Francesco,et al.  Productivity of mechanized whip harvesting with the Stemster MkIII in a short-rotation coppice established on farmland , 2018 .

[24]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Mechanised harvesting of short-rotation coppices , 2017 .

[25]  Lynn L. Wright,et al.  Short Rotation Eucalypt Plantations for Energy in Brazil , 2011 .

[26]  Detlef Ehlert,et al.  Harvesters for short rotation coppice: current status and new solutions , 2013 .

[27]  R. Spinelli,et al.  Trade-offs between fuel chip quality and harvesting efficiency in energy plantations , 2016 .

[28]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Influence of various machinery combinations, fuel proportions and storage capacities on costs for co-handling of straw and reed canary grass to district heating plants. , 2001 .

[29]  Philippe Savoie,et al.  Novel Willow Header Adapted to a Pull-Type Forage Harvester : Development and Field Experiments , 2014 .

[30]  D. R. Buckmaster J. W. Hilton.  COMPUTERIZED CYCLE ANALYSIS OF HARVEST, TRANSPORT, AND UNLOAD SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[31]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .