Generalized lambda distribution for the expression of measurement uncertainty

The generalized lambda distribution family fits the probability distributions of a wide variety of data sets, including the most important distributions encountered in the measurement applications (normal, uniform, Student's t, U-shaped, exponential). This paper illustrates how the four parameters needed for such distribution can be exploited in the expression of measurement uncertainty and to extend the information related to a measurement. The obtained representation allows an immediate calculation of coverage intervals and is particularly useful to support the techniques commonly applied in the estimation of the combined uncertainty. Moreover, in order to include the classical measurement information, a novel parameterization of the distribution is proposed

[1]  Alessandro Ferrero,et al.  A calibration procedure for a digital instrument for electric power quality measurement , 2002, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[2]  G. D'Antona,et al.  Expanded uncertainty and coverage factor computation by higher order moments analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[3]  H. L. MacGillivray,et al.  Theory & Methods: A Starship Estimation Method for the Generalized λ Distributions , 1999 .

[4]  Ciro Spataro,et al.  Approaches to evaluate the virtual instrumentation measurement uncertainties , 2002, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[5]  Edward J. Dudewicz,et al.  Fitting the generalized lambda distribution to data: a method based on percentiles , 1999 .

[6]  E. Dudewicz,et al.  The extended generalized lambda distribution system for fitting distributions to data: history, completion of theory, tables, applications, the “final word” on moment fits , 1996 .

[7]  Thomas E. Wehrly Fitting Statistical Distributions: The Generalized Lambda Distribution and Generalized Bootstrap Methods , 2002, Technometrics.

[8]  E. Ghiani,et al.  Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  A. Zanobini,et al.  The evaluation of the combined standard uncertainty for nonlinear models , 2002, IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276).

[10]  W. Gilchrist,et al.  Statistical Modelling with Quantile Functions , 2000 .

[11]  A. Öztürk,et al.  Least Squares Estimation of the Parameters of the Generalized Lambda Distribution , 1985 .

[12]  A. Hetman,et al.  Calculation of Expanded Uncertainties without Knowledge of Coverage Factor , 2004 .

[13]  Alessandro Ferrero,et al.  The random-fuzzy variables: a new approach to the expression of uncertainty in measurement , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Antonio Pietrosanto,et al.  Structured approach to estimate the measurement uncertainty in digital signal elaboration algorithms , 1999 .

[15]  A. Lakhany,et al.  Estimating the parameters of the generalized lambda distribution , 2000 .

[16]  D.A. Lampasi,et al.  A practical approach to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[17]  Alistair B. Forbes,et al.  Software Support for Metrology Best Practice Guide No. 4 , 2007 .

[18]  Marshall Freimer,et al.  a study of the generalized tukey lambda family , 1988 .