Estrus detection in dairy cattle: Changes after the introduction of an automated activity monitoring system?

OBJECTIVE In context of the study farmers using an automated activity monitoring (AAM) system called Heatime were surveyed on estrus detection practices. The aim of the study was to gain an overview of the usual estrus detection methods and especially to learn about the practical aspects of that system. MATERIAL AND METHODS Items addressing farm and animal environment, estrus detection before and after installation of Heatime, reproduction, Heatime management and the farmer's perception of efficiency were asked. RESULTS A total of 232 survey forms were returned (58.3% response rate) and 219 surveys could be used for final analysis. Visual observation was the most common practice to detect estrus. After installation of the Heatime system the farmers assessed that the application of hormones for reproduction management decreased. The majority of the responding dairy farmers (93.1%) strongly agreed or agreed that heat detection was higher after the installation of Heatime. Most of them (92.3%) strongly agreed or agreed with the statement that the reproduction management became easier with Heatime. CONCLUSION Overall, 94.1% of the responding farm managers were satisfied with the Heatime system and almost all of them (94.5%) would install the system again. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results show that the Heatime system is a well accepted estrus detection aid and has the potential to reduce the time needed for estrus detection and might potentially reduce the use of hormones.

[1]  O. J. Ginther,et al.  Factors affecting progesterone concentration in cow's milk and dairy products. , 1976, Journal of animal science.

[2]  J Saumande,et al.  Electronic detection of oestrus in postpartum dairy cows: efficiency and accuracy of the DEC® (showheat) system , 2002 .

[3]  C. Risco,et al.  Management of periparturient disorders in dairy cattle. , 2005, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[4]  C Kamphuis,et al.  Field evaluation of 2 collar-mounted activity meters for detecting cows in estrus on a large pasture-grazed dairy farm. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  F. van Eerdenburg,et al.  When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. , 2010, Theriogenology.

[6]  Bas Kemp,et al.  Pedometer readings for estrous detection and as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[7]  B. Kemp,et al.  Relationship between progesterone concentrations in milk and blood and time of ovulation in dairy cattle. , 2006, Animal reproduction science.

[8]  C. A. Kiddy,et al.  Variation in physical activity as an indication of estrus in dairy cows. , 1977, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  H. L. Barr.  Influence of estrus detection on days open in dairy herds. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  R L Nebel,et al.  On-farm milk progesterone tests. , 1988, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. Routly,et al.  Comparison of oestrus detection methods in dairy cattle , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[12]  K. L. Macmillan,et al.  Comparison of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles. , 2003, Australian veterinary journal.

[13]  A. O. Refsdal.  To treat or not to treat: a proper use of hormones and antibiotics. , 2000, Animal reproduction science.

[14]  M. Lucy,et al.  Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  S L Spahr,et al.  Detection and characterization of estrus in dairy cattle with an electronic heatmount detector and an electronic activity tag. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  R L Nebel,et al.  Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  K. Weigel,et al.  Results of a producer survey regarding crossbreeding on US dairy farms. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  K. Weigel,et al.  Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Walton,et al.  Reproductive performance with an automated activity monitoring system versus a synchronized breeding program. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  P. L. Senger,et al.  The estrus detection problem: new concepts, technologies, and possibilities. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  K. Weigel,et al.  Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large US commercial farms. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  B. Hoffmann,et al.  [Progesterone in milk: determination by radioimmunoassay, relations to corpus luteum function and milk fat concentrations (author's transl)]. , 1973, Zuchthygiene.

[23]  B. L. Harris,et al.  Improving the power of activity-based heat detection using additional automatically captured data , 2010 .

[24]  K. L. Macmillan,et al.  Characteristics of oestrus measured using visual observation and radiotelemetry. , 2003, Animal reproduction science.

[25]  W. Mccaughey,et al.  Fertility of dairy cows in Northern Ireland , 2002, Veterinary Record.

[26]  H. Dobson,et al.  The high-producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance. , 2007, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[27]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Short communication: survey of fresh cow management practices of dairy cattle on small and large commercial farms. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  C. Phillips,et al.  Variation in the milk production, activity rate and electrical impedance of cervical mucus over the oestrous period of dairy cows , 1991 .

[29]  D. Weary,et al.  Technical note: Validation of a system for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.