A simulation model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity to explain litter size in mice: I. Model development and implementation.

Litter size in mice was studied using a model including ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability, and uterine capacity. Simulated results were compared with experimental results from a selection experiment with mice. The four criteria of selection were selection on number born (LS), selection on an index of ovulation rate and ova success (IX), selection on number born to unilaterally ovariectomized females (UT), and unselected control (LC). Comparisons were made to statistics of the base generation and to responses after 13 generations of selection. Phenotypic and genetic statistics for uterine capacity were generated so that simulations produced the experimental means, standard deviations, and correlations between left and right litter size, as well as responses in number born using the LS, IX, and UT criteria. Statistics for the simulated data generally agreed with observed values. Simulated heritability in the base generation for uterine capacity was .065. Experimental and simulated responses per generation in litter size through 13 generations of selection were .15 and .16, .17 and .18, and .10 and .11 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated responses in uterine capacity after 13 generations were 2.19, 1.60, and 3.40 for LS, IX, and UT, respectively. Simulated means for the base generation were 13.22 and 16.30 for ovulation rate and uterine capacity, respectively. Uterine capacity was an important component of the variability in litter size; however, ovulation rate was the more limiting component.

[1]  M. K. Nielsen,et al.  Embryonal survival to 6 days in mice selected on different criteria for litter size. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[2]  A. Clutter,et al.  Estimates of heritabilities and genetic and environmental correlations for left- and right-side uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[3]  M. Pérez-Enciso,et al.  Genetic implications of a bivariate threshold model for litter size components. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[4]  A. Clutter,et al.  Uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice selected 21 generations on alternative criteria to increase litter size. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[5]  H. Rochambeau,et al.  Long-term selection-comparison of two rabbit strains. , 1994 .

[6]  A. Blasco,et al.  Divergent selection for uterine efficiency in unilaterally ovariectomized rabbits. I. Phenotypic and genetic parameters. , 1994 .

[7]  M. K. Nielsen,et al.  Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: III. Response to 21 generations of selection. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Blair,et al.  Effects of three methods of selection for litter size in mice on pre-implantation embryonic development. , 1992, Biology of reproduction.

[9]  R. Johnson,et al.  Estimates of genetic parameters for direct and maternal effects on embryonic survival in swine. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[10]  R. Johnson,et al.  Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: I. Characterization of base population and development of methods. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[11]  J. Gion,et al.  Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: II. Response to thirteen generations of selection. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[12]  G. L. Bennett,et al.  Genetic implications of a simulation model of litter size in swine based on ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity: I. Genetic theory. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[13]  G. L. Bennett,et al.  Genetic implications of a simulation model of litter size in swine based on ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity: II. Simulated selection. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[14]  R. Johnson,et al.  INDEX SELECTION FOR COMPONENTS OF LITTER SIZE IN SWINE: RESPONSE TO FIVE GENERATIONS OF SELECTION , 1989 .

[15]  G. L. Bennett,et al.  Integration of ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity into a model of litter size in swine. , 1989, Journal of animal science.

[16]  C. Haley,et al.  Selection for litter size in the pig. , 1988 .

[17]  R. Christenson,et al.  Justification of unilateral hysterectomy-ovariectomy as a model to evaluate uterine capacity in swine. , 1987, Journal of animal science.

[18]  W. C. Becker,et al.  Inequality in function of the right and left ovaries and uterine horns of the mouse. , 1987, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[19]  G. Bolet Timing and Extent of Embryonic Mortality in Pigs Sheep and Goats: Genetic Variability , 1986 .

[20]  R. Kittok,et al.  Selection for components of reproduction in swine , 1984 .

[21]  G. Bradford Genetic variation in prenatal survival and litter size. , 1979, Journal of animal science.

[22]  E. J. Eisen Single-trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice. , 1978, Genetics.

[23]  R. L. Baker,et al.  Selection for Litter Size in Mice , 1977 .

[24]  G. Bradford Genetic control of ovulation rate and embryo survival in mice. I. Response to selection. , 1969, Genetics.

[25]  D. Falconer,et al.  Genetic studies of ovulation rate in the mouse. , 1969, Genetical research.

[26]  G. Bradford Selection for litter size in mice in the presence and absence of gonadotropin treatment. , 1968, Genetics.

[27]  A. Mclaren,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF EGGS AND EMBRYOS BETWEEN SIDES IN THE MOUSE. , 1963, The Journal of endocrinology.

[28]  D. Falconer,et al.  Analysis of differences in the numbers of eggs shed by the two ovaries of mice during natural oestrus or after superovulation. , 1961, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[29]  D. Falconer The genetics of litter size in mice. , 1960, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[30]  D. Michie,et al.  Transmigration of Unborn Mice , 1954, Nature.