Extending the robustness and efficiency of artificial compressibility for partitioned fluid-structure interactions

Abstract In this paper we introduce the idea of combining artificial compressibility (AC) with quasi-Newton (QN) methods to solve strongly coupled, fully/quasi-enclosed fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problems. Partitioned, incompressible, FSI based on Dirichlet–Neumann domain decomposition solution schemes cannot be applied to problems where the fluid domain is fully enclosed. A simple example often provided in literature is that of a balloon with a prescribed inflow velocity. In this context, artificial compressibility (AC) is a useful method by which the incompressibility constraint can be relaxed by including a source term within the fluid continuity equation. The attractiveness of AC stems from the fact that this source term can readily be added to almost any fluid field solver, including most commercial solvers. Once included, both the modified fluid solver and structural solver can be treated as “black-box” field operators. AC is however limited to the class of problems it can effectively be applied to. For example, AC is an efficient solution strategy for the simulation of blood flow through arteries, but performs poorly when applied to the simulation of blood flow through an opening heart valve. The focus of this paper is thus to extend the application of AC by including an additional Newton system accounting for the missing interface sensitivities. We do so through the use of a multi-vector update quasi-Newton (MVQN) method, where the required system Jacobians are approximated rather than explicitly computed. In so doing, we continue to facilitate the notion that the AC modified fluid field solver and solid field solver can be treated as “black-box” solvers. We aim to demonstrate the improved performance of the combination of AC+QN when compared to AC applied in isolation.

[1]  H. Matthies,et al.  Partitioned Strong Coupling Algorithms for Fluid-Structure-Interaction , 2003 .

[2]  Schalk Kok,et al.  Quasi-Newton methods for implicit black-box FSI coupling , 2014 .

[3]  Joris Degroote,et al.  On the similarity between Dirichlet-Neumann with interface artificial compressibility and Robin-Neumann schemes for the solution of fluid-structure interaction problems , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Fluid-structure partitioned procedures based on Robin transmission conditions , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  W. Wall,et al.  A Solution for the Incompressibility Dilemma in Partitioned Fluid–Structure Interaction with Pure Dirichlet Fluid Domains , 2006 .

[6]  K. Bathe,et al.  Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction , 2009 .

[7]  Hermann G. Matthies,et al.  Nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problem. Part I: implicit partitioned algorithm, nonlinear stability proof and validation examples , 2011 .

[8]  Wulf G. Dettmer,et al.  On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid–structure interaction , 2008 .

[9]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Comparison of the conservative and a consistent approach for the coupling of non-matching meshes , 2006 .

[10]  A. Chorin A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems , 1997 .

[11]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Simulation of fluid–structure interaction with the interface artificial compressibility method , 2010 .

[12]  Mikko Lyly,et al.  A method for partitioned fluid-structure interaction computation of flow in arteries. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction problems with reduced order models , 2007 .

[14]  H. Bijl,et al.  Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation , 2007 .

[15]  Mikko Lyly,et al.  FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS BY ARTIFICIAL COMPRESSIBILITY , 2001 .

[16]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[17]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  An efficient coupling procedure for flexible wall fluid-structure interaction , 2000 .

[18]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Coupling strategies for biomedical fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[19]  J. Boyle,et al.  Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches , 2008 .

[20]  J. Vierendeels,et al.  Performance of partitioned procedures in fluid-structure interaction , 2010 .

[21]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Fluid–structure algorithms based on Steklov–Poincaré operators , 2006 .