Comparison between Lingual and Labial Orthodontics Based on Treatment of overbite by Using Rocking Chair Arch Wire-A Biomechanical Study

Background Lingual orthodontics (LiO) has developed rapidly in recent years and research on treatment of overbite by using Rocking Chair Arch (RCA) wire of different curve depths is still limited, especially with 3-dimensional Finite Element (FE) models. The main objectives are to study the biomechanical differences in maxillary anterior teeth between lingual and labial orthodontics and observe the lingual mechanics on different inclinations of teeth. Methods The force produced by Nickel-Titanium, Stainless Steel (SS) RCA for both sides was measured using Electromechanical Universal Testing Machine. 6 FE models were constructed and divided into 2 groups according to SS wire of 0.016x0.022-inch standard and mushroom arch shaped RCA of curve depth 2, 4, 6 mm. Additional 9 FE models were constructed and divided into 3 groups based on Retroclination (-5°, -10°) and Proclination (+10°). Results Use of same diameter of SS RCA with same curve depth but on different sides shows more stress and strain, displacement of teeth in lingual mechanics. Also, stress-strain, displacement increased with increasing RCA curve depth. In LiO, intrusion of normally inclined or proclined teeth are accompanied by little or no labial tipping whereas that of retroclined teeth is accompanied by further lingual tipping. Conclusion In the intrusion using Lingual RCA, to avoid the traumatic force to teeth, the curve depth should be lesser than Labial RCA or apply more elastic arch material; Aligning different inclined teeth into normal inclination firstly and proceed with the application of intrusive force can be the best approach.

[1]  Bernardo Oliveira Hargreaves,et al.  Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study. , 2015, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Stéphane Barthélémi,et al.  Components of overbite correction in lingual orthodontics: molar extrusion or incisor intrusion? , 2014, International orthodontics.

[3]  K. Keluskar,et al.  En-masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth by Applying Force from Four Different Levels - A Finite Element Study. , 2014, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[4]  A. Arreghini,et al.  3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction , 2014, Progress in orthodontics.

[5]  Seong-Hun Kim,et al.  Torque control during lingual anterior retraction without posterior appliances , 2013, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[6]  N. Pandis,et al.  A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated with various maxillary incisor intrusion biomechanics. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  F. Veziroğlu,et al.  Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion. , 2009, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  Silvia Geron,et al.  Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors--a theoretical approach. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  H. Koh,et al.  Effect of reverse curve mushroom archwire on lower incisors in adult patients: a prospective study. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  C. sreedhar,et al.  Deep overbite-A review (Deep bite, Deep overbite, Excessive overbite) , 2009 .

[11]  Qiguo Rong,et al.  Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  D. Bagga Lingual Orthodontics versus labial Orthodontics: An Overview , 2007 .

[13]  R. Romano Concepts on Control of the Anterior Teeth Using the Lingual Appliance , 2006 .

[14]  B. Melsen,et al.  The Finite Element Method: a Tool to Study Orthodontic Tooth Movement , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[15]  J. Harris,et al.  Tensile Testing , 1967, Testing of the Plastic Deformation of Metals.