Training skills and assessing performance in simulator-based learning environments

This article reports the results from a research project on the use of simulator technologies in the training and assessment of professional performance in maritime training. The research draws on ethnographic fieldwork and analyses of video-recorded data to examine how maritime instructors make use of simulator technologies during instruction. Our results reveal an instructional practice where the need to account for general principles of good seamanship and international regulations is at the core of the basic maritime training. The meanings of good seamanship and the rules of the sea are hard to teach in abstraction, since their application relies on an infinite number of contingencies that have to be accounted for in every specific case. Based on this premise, we are stressing the importance of both inscenario instruction and post-simulation debriefing in order for the instructor to bridge theory and practice in ways that develop the students' professional competences. Moreover, our results highlight how simulator technologies enable unique ways of displaying and assessing such competences by enabling instructors to continuously monitor, assess and provide feedback to the students throughout training sessions. Our results imply that training models advocating isolating and targeting technical and non-technical skills during training conflict with training for rule-governed maritime operations where such skills are intricately entwined. Furthermore, our results show that debriefing models that recommend a linear chronological order of discrete phases could be misleading. Although this structure might provide an overall resource, processes of connecting principles and rules to a multitude of specific circumstances in the training scenarios are at play throughout the debriefings.

[1]  Gr Emad,et al.  Introduction of technology into workplace and the need for change in pedagogy , 2010 .

[2]  David M. Gaba,et al.  The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning , 2007, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[3]  Monika Richter,et al.  Cognition In The Wild , 2016 .

[4]  Magnus Hontvedt,et al.  Professional vision in simulated environments — Examining professional maritime pilots' performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator , 2015 .

[5]  Magnus Hontvedt,et al.  Simulations in Maritime Training: A video study of the socio-technical organisation of ship simulator training , 2015 .

[6]  N. Dahlstroma,et al.  Fidelity and validity of simulator training , 2009 .

[7]  B. Asher The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[8]  Charlott Sellberg,et al.  Representing and enacting movement: The body as an instructional resource in a simulator-based environment , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[9]  Charlott Sellberg,et al.  Demonstrating professional intersubjectivity: The instructor's work in simulator-based learning environments , 2017 .

[10]  J. Hindmarch Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life , 2012, QMiP Bulletin.

[11]  M. P. Wickers,et al.  Establishing the Climate for a Successful Debriefing , 2010 .

[12]  Paulica Arsenie,et al.  Reducing of maritime accidents caused by human factors using simulators in training process , 2008 .

[13]  Charlott Sellberg,et al.  Temporal and Material Conditions for Instruction in Simulation-Based Maritime Training , 2015 .

[14]  R. Glavin,et al.  Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? , 2003, Medical education.

[15]  Avijit Banerjee,et al.  Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training , 2014 .

[16]  Hans Rystedt,et al.  Experiences, appearances, and interprofessional training: The instructional use of video in post-simulation debriefings , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[17]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills , 2008 .

[18]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[19]  Charlott Sellberg,et al.  Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis , 2017 .

[20]  Hans Rystedt,et al.  Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements , 2012 .

[21]  Hans Christian Arnseth,et al.  On the bridge to learn: Analysing the social organization of nautical instruction in a ship simulator , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..