Contributions of foliage distribution and leaf functions to light interception, transpiration and photosynthetic capacities in two apple cultivars at branch and tree scales.

Both the spatial distribution of leaves and leaf functions affect the light interception, transpiration and photosynthetic capacities of trees, but their relative contributions have rarely been investigated. We assessed these contributions at the branch and tree scales in two apple cultivars (Malus x domestica Borkh. 'Fuji' and 'Braeburn') with contrasting architectures, by estimating their branch and tree capacities and comparing them with outputs from a radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis (RATP) functional-structural plant model (FSPM). The structures of three 8-year-old trees of each cultivar were digitized to obtain 3-D representations of foliage geometry. Within-tree foliage distribution was compared with shoot demography, number of leaves per shoot and mean individual leaf area. We estimated branch and tree light interception from silhouette to total leaf area ratios (STAR), transpiration from sap flux measurements and net photosynthetic rates by the branch bag method. Based on a set of parameters we previously established for both cultivars, the outputs of the RATP model were tested against STAR values, sap fluxes and photosynthetic measurements. The RATP model was then used to virtually switch foliage distribution or leaf functions (stomatal and photosynthetic properties), or both, between cultivars and to evaluate the effects on branch and tree light interception, transpiration and photosynthetic capacities in each cultivar. 'Fuji' trees had a higher proportion of leaf area borne on long shoots, fewer leaves per unit shoot length and a larger individual leaf area than 'Braeburn' trees. This resulted in a lower leaf area density and, consequently, a higher STAR in 'Fuji' than in 'Braeburn' at both branch and tree scales. Transpiration and photosynthetic rates were significantly higher in 'Fuji' than in 'Braeburn'. Branch heterogeneity was greater in 'Braeburn' than in 'Fuji'. An analysis of the virtual switches of foliage distribution or leaf function showed that differences in leaf spatial distribution and functions had additive effects that accounted for the lower transpiration and photosynthetic rates of branches and trees of 'Braeburn' compared with 'Fuji'. Leaf distribution had a more important role at the branch scale than at the tree scale, but the leaf function effect exceeded the leaf distribution effect at both scales. Our study demonstrated the potential of FSPM to disentangle physiological differences between cultivars through in silico scenarios.

[1]  G. Carter,et al.  Influence of shoot structure on light interception and photosynthesis in conifers. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[2]  P. Jarvis.  The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[3]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[4]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Spatial distribution of leaf dry weight per area and leaf nitrogen concentration in relation to local radiation regime within an isolated tree crown. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[5]  F. Daudet,et al.  Un système simple pour la mesure in situ des échanges gazeux de couverts végétaux de quelques mètres carrés de surface foliaire , 1987 .

[6]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Light interception in apple trees influenced by canopy architecture manipulation , 2004, Trees.

[7]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of partially 3D-digitized peach tree canopies. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[8]  Francisco de Castro,et al.  The effect of leaf clustering in the interception of light in vegetal canopies: theoretical considerations , 1999 .

[9]  Jari Perttunen,et al.  LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees , 1998 .

[10]  Jean Dauzat,et al.  Simulation of leaf transpiration and sap flow in virtual plants: model description and application to a coffee plantation in Costa Rica. , 2001 .

[11]  P. E. Lauri,et al.  The Vertical Axis and Solaxe systems in France. , 1998 .

[12]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[13]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Does variability in shoot carbon assimilation within the tree crown explain variability in peach fruit growth? , 2004, Tree physiology.

[14]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Integrating markov chain models and L-systems to simulate the architectural development of apple trees , 2006 .

[15]  H Sinoquet,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthesis for mango leaves: evidence for the effect of fruit on photosynthetic capacity of nearby leaves. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[16]  J. Ross.  The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[17]  B. Schaffer,et al.  Handbook of Environmental Physiology of Fruit Crops , 1994 .

[18]  A. Takenaka,et al.  Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot , 1994, Ecological Research.

[19]  Christophe Godin,et al.  A Method for Describing Plant Architecture which Integrates Topology and Geometry , 1999 .

[20]  H Sinoquet,et al.  Exploring within-tree architectural development of two apple tree cultivars over 6 years. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[21]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  RATP: a model for simulating the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: application to an isolated tree crown , 2001 .

[22]  J. D. Dulk.  The interpretation of remote sensing : a feasibility study , 1989 .

[23]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[24]  Gerhard Buck-Sorlin,et al.  Functional-Structural Plant Models , 2008 .

[25]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[26]  Pierre-Eric Lauri,et al.  Relationship between the early development of apple fruiting branches and the regularity of bearing—An approach to the strategies of various cultivars , 1997 .

[27]  C. Valancogne,et al.  Une méthode de mesure du débit de sève brute dans de petits arbres par bilan de chaleur , 1989 .

[28]  T. Dejong,et al.  Seasonal relationships between leaf nitrogen content (photosynthetic capacity) and leaf canopy light exposure in peach (Prunus persica) , 1985 .

[29]  Catherine Massonnet,et al.  Variabilité architecturale et fonctionnelle du système aérien chez le pommier (Malus domestica Borkh.): comparaison de quatre cultivars par une approche de modélisation structure-fonction , 2004 .

[30]  Heikki Smolander,et al.  The Ratio of Shoot Silhouette Area to Total Needle Area in Scots Pine , 1988, Forest Science.

[31]  X. Le Roux,et al.  Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia) trees and seedlings. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[32]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Wind speed and leaf boundary layer conductance variation within tree crown: Consequences on leaf-to-atmosphere coupling and tree functions , 1999 .

[33]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Functional-structural plant modelling. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[34]  J. Hillier,et al.  Plasticity of plant architecture in response to density: Using maize as a model , 2004 .

[35]  J. W. Palmer,et al.  Interception of Light by Model Hedgerow Orchards in Relation to Latitude, Time of Year and Hedgerow Configuration and Orientation , 1972 .

[36]  Pierre Barbier De Reuille,et al.  Towards a dynamic model of the Arabidopsis meristem , 2004 .

[37]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Modeling radiative transfer in mixed and row intercropping systems , 1992 .

[38]  Christophe Godin,et al.  Similarities and gradients in growth unit branching patterns during ontogeny in "Fuji" apple trees: a stochastic approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[39]  H Sinoquet,et al.  Canopy structure and light interception in Quercus petraea seedlings in relation to light regime and plant density. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[40]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Characterization of the Light Environment in Canopies Using 3D Digitising and Image Processing , 1998 .

[41]  U. Niinemets,et al.  Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[42]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region , 1986 .

[43]  J. W. Palmer,et al.  Effect of apple tree spacing and summer pruning on leaf area distribution and light interception , 1992 .

[44]  J. Phattaralerphong,et al.  Foliage randomness and light interception in 3-D digitized trees: an analysis from multiscale discretization of the canopy , 2005 .

[45]  J. Palmer.  The effects of row orientation, tree height, time of year and latitude on light interception and distribution in model apple hedgerow canopies , 1989 .

[46]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Assessment of the three-dimensional architecture of walnut trees using digitising , 1997 .

[47]  R. W. Pearcy,et al.  Petiole twisting in the crowns of Psychotria limonensis: implications for light interception and daily carbon gain , 2003, Oecologia.

[48]  E. Costes,et al.  Stomatal regulation of photosynthesis in apple leaves: evidence for different water-use strategies between two cultivars. , 2007, Annals of botany.