Actor based analysis and modeling approaches

Integrated assessment (IA) can be defined as the scientific discipline that integrates knowledge about a problem domain and makes it available for policy development and decision making processes. Whereas initial approaches relied mainly on models as means for integration, subsequent approaches paid increasingly attention to including the knowledge of stakeholders in the assessment process. The human dimension has thus a prominent role to play. It is a challenge to represent human behaviour in integrated assessment models. A new approach, agent based modelling, proves to be very promising in this respect. It allows representation of the complex dynamics of human-technology-environment systems and is particularly suitable for participatory approaches. Actor based analysis and modelling takes into account that decision making processes are complex and that any assessment has to take the subjective perceptions and individual framings of actors into account. The combination of integrated models and multi-scale stakeholder processes is a promising approach to assess and manage societal transformation processes in dealing with complex socio-environmental problems.

[1]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  A. Balmann Farm-Based Modelling of Regional Structural Change: A Cellular Automata Approach , 1997 .

[3]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Jacques Ferber,et al.  Multi-agent systems - an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[5]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  John L. Casti Can you trust it?: on the reliability of computer simulation and the validity of models , 1997 .

[7]  Pieter W. G. Bots,et al.  Automatic pattern detection in stakeholder networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  M. Hare,et al.  Stakeholder Categorisation in Participatory Integrated Assessment Processes , 2002 .

[9]  H. Randy Gimblett,et al.  Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes , 2001 .

[10]  Kathrin Happe,et al.  Agentenbasierte Politik- und Sektoranalyse - Perspektiven und Herausforderungen , 2001 .

[11]  James H. Love,et al.  The Trust Process in Organizations: Empirical Studies of the Determinants and the Process of Trust Development (Book Review) , 2004 .

[12]  Robert G. Varady,et al.  Openness, Sustainability, and Public Participation: New Designs for Transboundary River Basin Institutions , 1999 .

[13]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological and Social Dynamics in Simple Models of Ecosystem Management , 1999 .

[14]  Johannes T.A. Bressers,et al.  Achieving sustainable development, The challenge of governance across social scales , 2003 .

[15]  W. Gujer,et al.  The concept of sustainable Urban Water Management , 1997 .

[16]  Jeffrey Johnson The "can you trust it?" Problem of simulation science in the design of socio-technical systems , 2000, Complex..

[17]  M. Craps Social Learning in River Basin Management , 2003 .

[18]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment and information systems for catchment management , 2001 .

[19]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Learning from integrated assessment of climate change , 1996 .

[20]  J. Rotmans Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[21]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Modelling socio-technical transformations in wastewater treatment—A methodological proposal , 2006 .

[22]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[23]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[24]  François Bousquet,et al.  Agent-Based modelling, game theory and natural resource management issues , 2001 .

[25]  Susanna Nilsson,et al.  The role and use of information in transboundary water management , 2003 .

[26]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Spatial complexity, resilience and policy diversity: fishing on lake-rich landscapes , 2004 .

[27]  T A Larsen,et al.  Investigating consumer attitudes towards the new technology of urine separation. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  Julie A. Adams,et al.  Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 2001, AI Mag..

[29]  Robert Fildes Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  François Bousquet,et al.  Adapting Science to Adaptive Managers: Spidergrams, Belief Models, and Multi-agent Systems Modeling , 2002 .

[31]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[32]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[33]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[34]  M. Janssen Complexity and Ecosystem Management: The Theory and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems , 2003 .

[35]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Towards sustainability in the water sector – The importance of human actors and processes of social learning , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.