Minimally invasive percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation: increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure by means of a novel electromagnetic navigation system

BackgroundMinimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation methods may increase the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy, resulting in excessive radiation exposure for the patient, surgeon, and support staff. Electromagnetic field (EMF)-based navigation may aid more accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws while reducing fluoroscopic exposure. We compared the accuracy, time of insertion, and radiation exposure of EMF with traditional fluoroscopic percutaneous pedicle screw placement.Methods Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in T8 to S1 pedicles of eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric torsos was guided with EMF or standard fluoroscopy. Set-up, insertion, and fluoroscopic times and radiation exposure and accuracy (measured with post-procedural computed tomography) were analyzed in each group.ResultsSixty-two pedicle screws were placed under fluoroscopic guidance and 60 under EMF guidance. Ideal trajectories were achieved more frequently with EMF over all segments (62.7% vs. 40%; p = 0.01). Greatest EMF accuracy was achieved in the lumbar spine, with significant improvements in both ideal trajectory and reduction of pedicle breaches over fluoroscopically guided placement (64.9% vs. 40%, p = 0.03, and 16.2% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.01, respectively). Fluoroscopy time was reduced 77% with the use of EMF (22 s vs. 5 s per level; p < 0.0001) over all spinal segments. Radiation exposure at the hand and body was reduced 60% (p = 0.058) and 32% (p = 0.073), respectively. Time for insertion did not vary between the two techniques.ConclusionsMinimally invasive pedicle screw placement with the aid of EMF image guidance reduces fluoroscopy time and increases placement accuracy when compared with traditional fluoroscopic guidance while adding no additional time to the procedure.

[1]  M. Austin,et al.  Image-Guided Spine Surgery: A Cadaver Study Comparing Conventional Open Laminoforaminotomy and Two Image-Guided Techniques for Pedicle Screw Placement in Posterolateral Fusion and Nonfusion Models , 2002, Spine.

[2]  J. A. Carrino,et al.  Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: Accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional fluoroscopic guidance , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  P. Santiago,et al.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  Christopher P Ames,et al.  Use of intraoperative isocentric C-arm 3D fluoroscopy for sextant percutaneous pedicle screw placement: case report and review of the literature. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  S. Chung,et al.  Comparison of Multifidus Muscle Atrophy and Trunk Extension Muscle Strength: Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2005, Spine.

[6]  H. Matsui,et al.  Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: Part 2 Histologic and Histochemical Analyses in Humans , 1994, Spine.

[7]  H. Matsui,et al.  Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Histologic and Enzymatic Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[8]  Melissa S. Murphy,et al.  Fusions and Transfusions: An Analysis of Blood Loss and Autologous Replacement During Lumbar Fusions , 1989, Spine.

[9]  S. Chung,et al.  Validation of the Korean Version of the Oswestry Disability Index , 2005, Spine.

[10]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy: A Meta-analysis , 2007, Spine.

[11]  R. Maciunas,et al.  Interactive image-guided neurosurgery , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[13]  B. Green,et al.  Computer-assisted Fluoroscopic Targeting System for Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Radiation Exposure to the Spine Surgeon During Fluoroscopically Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2000, Spine.

[15]  Maurice M. Smith,et al.  Image-guided spine surgery. , 1996, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[16]  J. Jang,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transmuscular Pedicle Screw Fixation of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Juan M. Taveras,et al.  Radiology : diagnosis, imaging, intervention , 1986 .

[20]  R. Gaines The Use of Pedicle-Screw Internal Fixation for the Operative Treatment of Spinal Disorders* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa,et al.  Accuracy Over Space and Time of Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation in the Lumbar Spine In Vivo , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[22]  Paul R. Cooper,et al.  The Practice of Neurosurgery , 1998 .

[23]  B. T. Field,et al.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Richard Assaker,et al.  Transpedicular Screw Placement: Image-Guided Versus Lateral-View Fluoroscopy:In Vitro Simulation , 2001, Spine.

[25]  U Weber,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement: A Computed Tomographic‐Supported Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[26]  R. Cautilli,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Electromagnetic Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Results of a Cadaveric Study to Evaluate Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2008, SAS Journal.

[28]  C. Ohaegbulam Minimally Invasive Transmuscular Pedicle Screw Fixation of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine , 2008 .

[29]  川口 善治,et al.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery , 1994 .

[30]  I Anzai,et al.  [Radiation exposure]. , 1968, Sogo kango. Comprehensive nursing, quarterly.

[31]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. Technical note. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[32]  D. Resnick Prospective Comparison of Virtual Fluoroscopy to Fluoroscopy and Plain Radiographs for Placement of Lumbar Pedicle Screws , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[33]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  Robert A Hart,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: A Comparison of Image-Guided and Manual Techniques in Cadavers , 2005, Spine.

[35]  D N Kunz,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Biomechanical Comparison, Including a New Threaded Cage , 1997, Spine.

[36]  D. Simon,et al.  Virtual Fluoroscopy: Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation , 2001, Spine.

[37]  J. Grauer,et al.  Sterility of C-arm Fluoroscopy During Spinal Surgery , 2008, Spine.

[38]  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,et al.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. , 1994 .

[39]  R. von Jako,et al.  Percutaneous laser discectomy guided with stereotactic computer‐assisted surgical navigation , 2009, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[40]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[41]  R. Sasso,et al.  Posterior instrumentation and fusion for unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A comparative study of three fixation devices in 70 patients. , 1993, Spine.

[42]  T. Dipasquale,et al.  Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: "how far away is far enough?". , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.